Emergency management perspectives on volunteered geographic information: Opportunities, challenges and change

Abstract Volunteered geographic information (VGI) refers to the widespread creation and sharing of geographic information by private citizens, often through platforms such as online mapping tools, social media, and smartphone applications. VGI has shifted the ways information is created, shared, used and experienced, with important implications for applications of geospatial data, including emergency management. Detailed interviews with 13 emergency management professionals from eight organisations across five Australian states provided insights into the impacts of VGI on official emergency management. Perceived opportunities presented by VGI included improved communication, acquisition of diverse local information, and increased community engagement in disaster management. Identified challenges included the digital divide, data management, misinformation, and liability concerns. Significantly, VGI disrupts the traditional top-down structure of emergency management and reflects a culture shift away from authoritative control of information. To capitalise on the opportunities of VGI, agencies need to share responsibility and be willing to remain flexible in supporting positive community practises, including VGI. Given the high accountability and inherently responsive nature of decision making in disaster management, it provides a useful lens through which to examine the impacts of VGI on official authoritative systems more broadly. This analysis of the perceptions of emergency management professionals suggests changes to traditional systems that involve decentralisation of power and increased empowerment of citizens, where value is increasingly recognised in both expert and citizen-produced information, initiatives and practises.

[1]  R. Fisher Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning , 1993 .

[2]  Johannes A.G.M. The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. , 2000 .

[3]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[4]  D. Ball Regions of Risk: a Geographical Introduction to Disasters , 1998 .

[5]  Poduthase Henry Rigor in Qualitative research: Promoting quality in Social Science Research , 2015 .

[6]  R. Bonney,et al.  Next Steps for Citizen Science , 2014, Science.

[7]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[8]  M. Triglav-Čekada,et al.  Using volunteered geographical information to map the November 2012 floods in Slovenia , 2013 .

[9]  Huiji Gao,et al.  Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[10]  Greg Brown Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: reflections on a decade of empirical research , 2012 .

[11]  Sophia B. Liu,et al.  Citizen communications in crisis: anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation , 2007, CHI.

[12]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science , 2014 .

[13]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[14]  Deanne Bird,et al.  Flooding Facebook - the use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods , 2012 .

[15]  M. Haklay Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation , 2013 .

[16]  K. Tierney,et al.  Metaphors Matter: Disaster Myths, Media Frames, and Their Consequences in Hurricane Katrina , 2006 .

[17]  M. Pla,et al.  El rigor en la investigación cualitativa , 1999 .

[18]  E. Bruce,et al.  Distribution patterns of migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in Jervis Bay, Australia: A spatial analysis using geographical citizen science data , 2014 .

[19]  E. Bruce,et al.  A Review of Volunteered Geographic Information for Disaster Management , 2015 .

[20]  Brenda Murphy,et al.  Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency management , 2007 .

[21]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Digital Earth Crowdsourcing Geographic Information for Disaster Response: a Research Frontier Crowdsourcing Geographic Information for Disaster Response: a Research Frontier , 2022 .

[22]  J. Handmer,et al.  A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges , 2015 .

[23]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Researching Volunteered Geographic Information: Spatial Data, Geographic Research, and New Social Practice , 2012 .

[24]  J. A. Glennona Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research , 2010 .

[25]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Predicting information credibility in time-sensitive social media , 2013, Internet Res..

[26]  J. Giles Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[27]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[28]  Douglas Paton,et al.  Fostering Community Bushfire Preparedness through Engagement and Empowerment , 2011 .

[29]  L. Shanley,et al.  Tweeting Up a Storm: The Promise and Perils of Crisis Mapping , 2013 .

[30]  Richard E. Lewis,et al.  A Multicountry Assessment of Tropical Resource Monitoring by Local Communities , 2014 .

[31]  L. Shanley,et al.  On Cybersecurity, Crowdsourcing, and Social Cyber-Attack , 2013 .

[32]  T. Scassa Legal Issues with Volunteered Geographic Information , 2013 .

[33]  Vyron Antoniou,et al.  How Many Volunteers Does it Take to Map an Area Well? The Validity of Linus’ Law to Volunteered Geographic Information , 2010 .

[34]  Michael J. Zakour,et al.  Community Disaster Vulnerability: Theory, Research, and Practice , 2012 .

[35]  Brenton Prosser,et al.  Directions in Disaster Resilience Policy , 2010 .

[36]  Ponnurangam Kumaraguru,et al.  Credibility ranking of tweets during high impact events , 2012, PSOSM '12.

[37]  W. Waugh,et al.  Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management , 2006 .

[38]  Gloria Bordogna,et al.  A linguistic decision making approach to assess the quality of volunteer geographic information for citizen science , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[39]  Helen J. Boon,et al.  Investigation rural community communication for flood and bushfire preparedness , 2014 .

[40]  L. Pearce Disaster Management and Community Planning, and Public Participation: How to Achieve Sustainable Hazard Mitigation , 2003 .

[41]  J. Handmer,et al.  Reframing responsibility-sharing for bushfire risk management in Australia after Black Saturday , 2012 .

[42]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Volunteered Geographic Information, the Exaflood, and the Growing Digital Divide , 2013 .

[43]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information , 2012 .

[44]  J. Handmer,et al.  'VISIONS OF SHARING RESPONSIBILITY FOR DISASTER RESILIENCE': SHARING CONTROL , 2013 .

[45]  F. Ostermann,et al.  Automated geographic context analysis for volunteered information , 2013 .

[46]  Billy Haworth,et al.  Emerging technologies for risk reduction: Assessing the potential use of social media and VGI for increasing community engagement , 2015 .

[47]  Beverley Raphael,et al.  The role of social media as psychological first aid as a support to community resilience building. , 2012 .

[48]  Benjamin M. Good,et al.  Games with a scientific purpose , 2011, Genome Biology.

[49]  K. Crawford,et al.  The limits of crisis data: analytical and ethical challenges of using social and mobile data to understand disasters , 2015 .

[50]  F. Berkes Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management , 1999 .

[51]  B H Morrow,et al.  Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. , 1999, Disasters.

[52]  P. Arbon,et al.  The future of social media use during emergencies in Australia: Insights from the 2014 Australian and New Zealand Disaster and Emergency Management conference social media workshop , 2015 .

[53]  Anthony Alexander,et al.  Fikret Berkes. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis, 1999. [Book Review] , 2001 .

[54]  Frank O. Ostermann,et al.  A conceptual workflow for automatically assessing the quality of volunteered geographic information for crisis management , 2011 .

[55]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The credibility of volunteered geographic information , 2008 .

[56]  P. Meier Crisis Mapping in Action: How Open Source Software and Global Volunteer Networks Are Changing the World, One Map at a Time , 2012 .

[57]  Bin Jiang,et al.  Volunteered Geographic Information: Towards the establishment of a new paradigm , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[58]  Bryan Boruff,et al.  Environmental livelihood security in Southeast Asia and Oceania , 2015 .

[59]  Ryan Burns Moments of Closure in the Knowledge Politics of Digital Humanitarianism , 2014 .