An Analytic Framework for Open Government Policy Design Processes

This paper lays out an analytical framework for OG policy design processes. It uses a systematic review of (1) scholarly literature, and (2) real OG policies to corroborate existing definitions of OG and its sub-categories. The sub-categories are then used for an in-depth literature review of policy design research that is developed into a conceptual model of OG design processes. The model establishes the design considerations needed by policymakers and administrators of OG policies, and can be used as a framework for evaluating OG policy processes. The paper also clarifies design concepts and best practices in a growing e-government domain, and outlines a research agenda for studying OG within organizational theory in public administration.

[1]  Dennis Linders,et al.  What is open government?: one year after the directive , 2011, dg.o '11.

[2]  J. Bryson,et al.  The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature , 2006 .

[3]  Nils Brunsson The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations , 1989 .

[4]  John Carlo Bertot,et al.  Measurement of Open Government: Metrics and Process , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  Daniel Berliner,et al.  The Political Origins of Transparency , 2014, The Journal of Politics.

[6]  J. Fox,et al.  The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability , 2007 .

[7]  Kaifeng Yang,et al.  Citizen participation in the budget process: the effect of city managers , 2009 .

[8]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen,et al.  A good man but a bad wizard. About the limits and future of transparency of democratic governments , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[11]  Jeremy Richardson,et al.  Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change , 2000 .

[12]  Kaiju Chang,et al.  Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective , 2011 .

[13]  Richard Heeks,et al.  The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Yuguo Liao,et al.  Participatory Budgeting in Local Government , 2011 .

[15]  A. Meijer Understanding the Complex Dynamics of Transparency , 2013 .

[16]  Michael J. Ahn,et al.  Adoption of E-Communication Applications in U.S. Municipalities: The Role of Political Environment, Bureaucratic Structure, and the Nature of Applications , 2011 .

[17]  Alex Ingrams,et al.  Public Accountability ICT Support: A Detailed Account of Public Accountability Process and Tasks , 2015, EGOV.

[18]  Weibing Xiao,et al.  Freedom of information reform in China: information flow analysis , 2011 .

[19]  Patrice McDermott,et al.  Building open government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  B. Peters,et al.  Performance Measurement and Management , 2002 .

[21]  Jeffrey L. Brudney,et al.  Reinventing Government in the American States: Measuring and Explaining Administrative Reform , 1999 .

[22]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[23]  M R Martins,et al.  Size of Municipalities, Efficiency, and Citizen Participation: A Cross-European Perspective , 1995 .

[24]  Harlan Yu,et al.  The New Ambiguity of 'Open Government' , 2012 .

[25]  E. Sørensen,et al.  Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance , 2009 .

[26]  Sunil Choenni,et al.  On the barriers for local government releasing open data , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Lyudmila Bershadskaya,et al.  Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  P. Julnes,et al.  Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation , 2001 .

[29]  Dong-Her Shih,et al.  An implementation framework for E-Government 2.0 , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[30]  Peter J. May,et al.  Collaborative service arrangements , 2007 .

[31]  M. Hillebrandt,et al.  Open government: connecting vision and voice , 2012 .

[32]  C. Bailard Democracy's Double-Edged Sword: How Internet Use Changes Citizens' Views of Their Government , 2014 .

[33]  W. Orlikowski The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[34]  Kimberly L. Nelson,et al.  The Roles of Local Government Managers in Theory and Practice: A Centennial Perspective , 2015 .

[35]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[37]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[38]  Hans Schaffers,et al.  Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation , 2011, Future Internet Assembly.

[39]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Creating public value through Open Government: Perspectives, experiences and applications , 2015, Inf. Polity.

[40]  Alasdair S. Roberts,et al.  Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age , 2006 .

[41]  D. West Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance , 2007 .

[42]  Roberto Boselli,et al.  Design and Implementation of Open-Government Initiatives at the Sub-National Level: Lessons from Italian Cases , 2014 .

[43]  Greta Nasi,et al.  ONLINE SERVICE PROVISION: ARE MUNICIPALITIES REALLY INNOVATIVE? THE CASE OF LARGER MUNICIPALITIES IN ITALY , 2011 .

[44]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[45]  David M. Konisky,et al.  Values, Conflict, and Trust in Participatory Environmental Planning , 2000 .

[46]  G. M. Furstenberg Hopes and delusions of transparency1 , 2001 .

[47]  Mary K. Feeney,et al.  Adoption of Electronic Technologies in Local U.S. Governments , 2014 .

[48]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[49]  Kate Cooney,et al.  Fields, Organizations, and Agency , 2007 .