Student Evaluations of Teaching: An Exploratory Study of the Faculty Response

Student evaluation of teaching instruments are commonly administered by universities to presumably provide feedback to faculty for improvement of teaching effectiveness. Instead, these measures are routinely used as a basis for determining faculty merit, promotion, and tenure, making the instruments vitally important to faculty. As a result, some faculty members may engage in various activities designed specifically to affect student ratings on teaching evaluations rather than to improve instruction, although no known research exists about the extent of such influencing activities. The purpose of this research is to begin the exploration of marketing faculty perceptions about, and problems with, student evaluations of teaching and perceived efforts to influence the measure. Furthermore, this study seeks to define categories of faculty activities and behaviors that may be used to influence student evaluations of teaching ratings and to identify possible solutions.

[1]  Lawrence M. Aleamoni,et al.  Student Ratings of Instruction , 1981 .

[2]  Edward M. Cross,et al.  Use of the Binomial Theorem in Interpreting Results of Multiple Tests of Significance , 1982 .

[3]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[4]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction , 1997 .

[5]  John C. Mowen,et al.  Utilizing Effort and Task Difficulty Information in Evaluating Salespeople , 1985 .

[6]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[7]  H. J. Bernardin,et al.  Attitudes of first-line supervisors toward subordinate appraisals , 1993 .

[8]  A. Greenwald.  Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[9]  P. Abrami,et al.  Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research , 1987 .

[10]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Sales Unit Effectiveness , 1994 .

[11]  Wendy M. Williams,et al.  “How'm I Doing?” Problems with Student Ratings of Instructors and Courses , 1997 .

[12]  William G. Zikmund,et al.  Exploring Marketing Research , 1986 .

[13]  Dennis F. X. Mathaisel,et al.  Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness in America's Business Schools: Implications for Service Marketers , 1998 .

[14]  B. Helm,et al.  The Actor-Observer Relationship: The Effect Of Actors' and Observers' Responsibility and Emotion Attributions , 1982 .

[15]  D. Clayson.  Students’ Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness: Some Implications of Stability , 1999 .

[16]  P. Schmidt.  A State Transforms Colleges with "Performance Funding.". , 1999 .

[17]  D. G. Barker,et al.  Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness. , 1970 .

[18]  W. McKeachie.  Student ratings: The validity of use. , 1997 .

[19]  C. McDaniel,et al.  Contemporary Marketing Research , 1991 .

[20]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  Teaching Effectiveness in the Organizational Sciences: Recognizing and Enhancing the Scholarship of Teaching , 1997 .

[21]  Gary Blau,et al.  Testing the Longitudinal Impact of Work Variables and Performance Appraisal Satisfaction on Subsequent Overall Job Satisfaction , 1999 .

[22]  Glenn M. McEvoy.  Evaluating the Boss , 1988 .

[23]  D. Magner.  Report Says Standards Used to Evaluate Research Should Also Be Used for Teaching and Service. , 1997 .

[24]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  The Influence of Coworker Feedback on Salespeople , 1994 .

[25]  Glenn M. McEvoy.  Public Sector Managers' Reactions to Appraisals by Subordinates , 1990 .

[26]  P. Abrami,et al.  Navigating student ratings of instruction. , 1997 .

[27]  F. Moussavi,et al.  Perceptual Effects of Participative, Goal-Oriented Performance Appraisal: A Field Study in Public Agencies , 1995 .

[28]  Gary E. Roberts,et al.  Performance Appraisal Participation, Goal Setting and Feedback , 1996 .

[29]  Thomas E. DeCarlo,et al.  Impact of Salesperson Attraction on Sales Managers’ Attributions and Feedback , 1996 .

[30]  M. Haire.  Projective Techniques in Marketing Research , 1950 .

[31]  R. Cardy,et al.  Affect and appraisal accuracy: Liking as an integral dimension in evaluating performance. , 1986 .

[32]  Susan K. Green,et al.  A General Model of the Attribution Process , 1985 .

[33]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[34]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Beyond Attribution Theory: Cognitive Processes in Performance Appraisal , 1981 .

[35]  L. Ross.  The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 , 1977 .

[36]  H. Marsh,et al.  Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. , 1997 .

[37]  Robin Wilson,et al.  New Research Casts Doubt on Value of Student Evaluations of Professors. , 1998 .

[38]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[39]  Jerrell D. Coggburn.  Professional Notes , 1998 .

[40]  P. Trout.  What the Num Providing a context for Numerical Student Evaluations of Courses , 1997 .

[41]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback , 1986 .

[42]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Effects of Introducing a Performance Management System on Employees' Subsequent Attitudes and Effort , 1999 .

[43]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  No Pain , No Gain ? The Importance of Measuring Course Workload in Student Ratings of Instruction , 1997 .

[44]  J. Millman.  Handbook of teacher evaluation , 1981 .

[45]  H. H. Kassarjian.  Content Analysis in Consumer Research , 1977 .

[46]  H. Marsh.  Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness , 1984 .

[47]  Roy Schwartzman,et al.  Are Students Customers? the Metaphoric Mismatch between Management and Education , 1995 .

[48]  G. Lane,et al.  A canadian replication of Mason Haire's ‘shopping list’ study , 1975 .

[49]  E. Aspinwall,et al.  A framework for measuring quality in engineering education , 1998 .

[50]  Alice A. Ketchand,et al.  Examining the Role of Service Quality in Overall Service Satisfaction , 1998 .