Perceptions and Attitudes of Medical Students towards Two Methods of Assessing Practical Anatomy Knowledge.

OBJECTIVES Traditionally, summative practical examination in anatomy takes the form of 'spotters' consisting of a stream of prosections, radiological images and dissections with pins indicating specific structures. Recently, we have started to administer similar examinations online using the quiz facility in Moodle™ (a free, open-source web application for producing modular internet-based courses) in addition to the traditional format. This paper reports on an investigation into students' perceptions of each assessment environment. METHODS Over a 3-year period, practical assessment in anatomy was conducted either in traditional format or online via learning management software called Moodle™. All students exposed to the two examination formats at the College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman, were divided into two categories: junior (Year 3) and senior (Year 4). An evaluation of their perception of both examination formats was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire consisting of restricted and free response items. RESULTS More than half of all students expressed a clear preference for the online environment and believed it was more exam-friendly. This preference was higher amongst senior students. Compared to females, male students preferred the online environment. Senior students were less likely to study on cadavers when the examination was conducted online. Specimen quality, ability to manage time, and seating arrangements were major advantages identified by students who preferred the online format. CONCLUSION Computer-based practical examinations in anatomy appeared to be generally popular with our students. The students adopted a different approach to study when the exam was conducted online as compared to the traditional 'steeplechase' format.

[1]  P L Schwartz,et al.  Pilot studies of in‐course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: II. Computer‐based, individual , 1997, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  A. Schmidtke,et al.  Strategies for reducing test anxiety and optimizing exam preparation in German university students: a prevention-oriented pilot project of the University of Würzburg , 2009, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[3]  L D Gruppen,et al.  Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  Varna Taranikanti,et al.  Anatomy “steeplechase” online: Necessity sometimes is the catalyst for innovation , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[5]  A. Rattan,et al.  Role of computers in learning—Application in formative assessment , 1994, Indian journal of pediatrics.

[6]  C. Friedman,et al.  A pilot study of microcomputer testing in paediatrics , 1984, Medical education.

[7]  M. Brosnan,et al.  A cross-cultural comparison of gender differences in computer attitudes and anxieties : the united kingdom and Hong Kong , 1998 .

[8]  S. King,et al.  Integration of e-learning technologies in an interprofessional health science course , 2008, Medical teacher.

[9]  L. Adrianson,et al.  Gender and computer-mediated communication: group processes in problem solving , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Fauziah Sulaiman,et al.  Gender Differences in Availability, Internet Access and Rate of Usage of Computers among Distance Education Learners , 2002 .

[11]  J A Swets,et al.  Computer-aided instruction. , 1965, Science.

[12]  Scott Elliott,et al.  Computer-Based Testing: Initial Report of Extensive Use in a Medical School Curriculum , 2004, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[13]  R. Gunderman Giving ourselves: The ethics of anatomical donation , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[14]  Anne Nevgi,et al.  Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning? , 2007, Medical teacher.

[15]  K E Duffield,et al.  A survey of medical students’ views about the purposes and fairness of assessment , 2002, Medical education.

[16]  Marina Dabić,et al.  Scaling-up undergraduate medical education: enabling virtual mobility by online elective courses. , 2008, Croatian medical journal.

[17]  S. Carley,et al.  Developing a virtual learning course in emergency medicine for F2 doctors , 2007, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[18]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Addressing Gender Differences in Computer Ability, Attitudes and Use: The Laptop Effect , 2006 .

[19]  I. Shah,et al.  Acute medicine teaching in an undergraduate medical curriculum: a blended learning approach , 2008, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[20]  R. Ogilvie,et al.  Students’ attitudes towards computer testing in a basic science course , 1999, Medical education.

[21]  Peter Cantillon,et al.  Using computers for assessment in medicine , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.