Automated Data Processing (ADP) Research and Development

Monitoring a comprehensive test ban treaty (CTBT) will require screening tens of thousands of seismic events each year. Reliable automated data analysis will be essential in keeping up with the continuous stream of events that a global monitoring network will detect. We are developing automated event location and identification algorithms by looking at the gaps and weaknesses in conventional ADP systems and by taking advantage of modem computational paradigms. Our research focus is on three areas: developing robust algorithms for signal feature extraction, integrating the analysis of critical measurements, and exploiting joint estimation techniques such as using data from acoustic, hydroacoustic, and seismic sensors. We identify several important problems for research and development; e.g., event location with approximate velocity models and event identification in the presence of outliers. We are employing both linear and nonlinear methods and advanced signal transform techniques to solve these event monitoring problems. Our goal is to increase event-interpretation throughput by employing the power and efficiency of modem computational techniques, and to improve the reliability of automated analysis by reducing the rates of false alarms and missed detections.

[1]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Wavelets in Geophysics , 1994 .

[2]  Frank L. Vernon,et al.  Multitaper spectral analysis of high-frequency seismograms , 1987 .

[3]  Farid U. Dowla,et al.  Backpropagation Learning for Multilayer Feed-Forward Neural Networks Using the Conjugate Gradient Method , 1991, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[4]  E. A. Flinn,et al.  Confidence regions and error determinations for seismic event location , 1965 .

[5]  R. Herrmann Digital processing of regional network data , 1982 .

[6]  Gary L. Pavlis,et al.  Appraising earthquake hypocenter location errors: A complete, practical approach for single-event locations , 1986 .

[7]  David B. Harris,et al.  A waveform correlation method for identifying quarry explosions , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  Florence Riviere-Barbier,et al.  Identification and location of closely spaced mining events , 1993 .

[9]  Peter M. Shearer,et al.  Global seismic event detection using a matched filter on long‐period seismograms , 1994 .

[10]  Leah L. Rogers,et al.  Solving Problems in Environmental Engineering and Geosciences with Artificial Neural Networks , 1996 .

[11]  Williams,et al.  Method of constrained global optimization. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[12]  Hans Israelsson,et al.  Correlation of waveforms from closely spaced regional events , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  C. Thurber Nonlinear earthquake location: Theory and examples , 1985 .

[14]  M. Taner,et al.  SEMBLANCE AND OTHER COHERENCY MEASURES FOR MULTICHANNEL DATA , 1971 .

[15]  M. H. Wirth,et al.  Automatic seismic array and network detection , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  J. Pechmann,et al.  Constraints on relative earthquake locations from cross-correlation of waveforms , 1987 .

[17]  F. Ryall,et al.  CSS Ground-Truth Database: Version 1 Handbook. , 1993 .

[18]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[19]  Yves Cansi,et al.  An automatic seismic event processing for detection and location: The P.M.C.C. Method , 1995 .

[20]  K. Veith Refined hypocenters and accurate reliability estimates , 1975, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.