Condensin-Driven Remodeling of X-Chromosome Topology during Dosage Compensation

The three-dimensional organization of a genome plays a critical role in regulating gene expression, yet little is known about the machinery and mechanisms that determine higher-order chromosome structure. Here we perform genome-wide chromosome conformation capture analysis, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and RNA-seq to obtain comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) maps of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome and to dissect X chromosome dosage compensation, which balances gene expression between XX hermaphrodites and XO males. The dosage compensation complex (DCC), a condensin complex, binds to both hermaphrodite X chromosomes via sequence-specific recruitment elements on X (rex sites) to reduce chromosome-wide gene expression by half. Most DCC condensin subunits also act in other condensin complexes to control the compaction and resolution of all mitotic and meiotic chromosomes. By comparing chromosome structure in wild-type and DCC-defective embryos, we show that the DCC remodels hermaphrodite X chromosomes into a sex-specific spatial conformation distinct from autosomes. Dosage-compensated X chromosomes consist of self-interacting domains (∼1 Mb) resembling mammalian topologically associating domains (TADs). TADs on X chromosomes have stronger boundaries and more regular spacing than on autosomes. Many TAD boundaries on X chromosomes coincide with the highest-affinity rex sites and become diminished or lost in DCC-defective mutants, thereby converting the topology of X to a conformation resembling autosomes. rex sites engage in DCC-dependent long-range interactions, with the most frequent interactions occurring between rex sites at DCC-dependent TAD boundaries. These results imply that the DCC reshapes the topology of X chromosomes by forming new TAD boundaries and reinforcing weak boundaries through interactions between its highest-affinity binding sites. As this model predicts, deletion of an endogenous rex site at a DCC-dependent TAD boundary using CRISPR/Cas9 greatly diminished the boundary. Thus, the DCC imposes a distinct higher-order structure onto X chromosomes while regulating gene expression chromosome-wide.

[1]  D. Albertson,et al.  DPY-27: A chromosome condensation protein homolog that regulates C. elegans dosage compensation through association with the X chromosome , 1994, Cell.

[2]  D A Agard,et al.  IVE (Image Visualization Environment): a software platform for all three-dimensional microscopy applications. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[3]  C. Nusbaum,et al.  Dosage compensation proteins targeted to X chromosomes by a determinant of hermaphrodite fate. , 1999, Science.

[4]  J. Dekker,et al.  Capturing Chromosome Conformation , 2002, Science.

[5]  R. Kamath,et al.  Genome-wide RNAi screening in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2003, Methods.

[6]  B. Meyer,et al.  Clustered DNA motifs mark X chromosomes for repression by a dosage compensation complex , 2006, Nature.

[7]  Job Dekker,et al.  Determining spatial chromatin organization of large genomic regions using 5C technology. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[8]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[9]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases , 2009, Nature Methods.

[10]  M. Eisen,et al.  A condensin-like dosage compensation complex acts at a distance to control expression throughout the genome. , 2009, Genes & development.

[11]  Paul W. Sternberg,et al.  RNA Pol II Accumulates at Promoters of Growth Genes During Developmental Arrest , 2009, Science.

[12]  J. Yates,et al.  Three Distinct Condensin Complexes Control C. elegans Chromosome Dynamics , 2009, Current Biology.

[13]  David G Mets,et al.  Condensins Regulate Meiotic DNA Break Distribution, thus Crossover Frequency, by Controlling Chromosome Structure , 2009, Cell.

[14]  J. Lieb,et al.  Caenorhabditis elegans chromosome arms are anchored to the nuclear membrane via discontinuous association with LEM-2 , 2010, Genome Biology.

[15]  W. Huber,et al.  which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. MAnorm: a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets , 2011 .

[16]  Serban Nacu,et al.  Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads , 2010, Bioinform..

[17]  B. Meyer.  Targeting X chromosomes for repression. , 2010, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[18]  B. Meyer,et al.  An MLL/COMPASS subunit functions in the C. elegans dosage compensation complex to target X chromosomes for transcriptional regulation of gene expression. , 2011, Genes & Development.

[19]  A. Rechtsteiner,et al.  Broad chromosomal domains of histone modification patterns in C. elegans. , 2011, Genome research.

[20]  J. Dekker,et al.  Hi-C: a comprehensive technique to capture the conformation of genomes. , 2012, Methods.

[21]  A. Tanay,et al.  Three-Dimensional Folding and Functional Organization Principles of the Drosophila Genome , 2012, Cell.

[22]  J. Sedat,et al.  Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre , 2012, Nature.

[23]  Dimos Gaidatzis,et al.  Step-Wise Methylation of Histone H3K9 Positions Heterochromatin at the Nuclear Periphery , 2012, Cell.

[24]  Jesse R. Dixon,et al.  Topological Domains in Mammalian Genomes Identified by Analysis of Chromatin Interactions , 2012, Nature.

[25]  L. Mirny,et al.  Iterative Correction of Hi-C Data Reveals Hallmarks of Chromosome Organization , 2012, Nature Methods.

[26]  J. Dekker,et al.  The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters , 2012, Nature.

[27]  Michael S. Becker,et al.  Spatial Organization of the Mouse Genome and Its Role in Recurrent Chromosomal Translocations , 2012, Cell.

[28]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Dynamic Imaging of Genomic Loci in Living Human Cells by an Optimized CRISPR/Cas System , 2014, Cell.

[29]  Steven Lin,et al.  Precise and Heritable Genome Editing in Evolutionarily Diverse Nematodes Using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 to Engineer Insertions and Deletions , 2013, Genetics.

[30]  Jesse R. Dixon,et al.  Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Bas van Steensel,et al.  Genome Architecture: Domain Organization of Interphase Chromosomes , 2013, Cell.

[32]  George M. Church,et al.  Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system , 2013, Nature Methods.

[33]  D. Duboule,et al.  Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes , 2013, Nature.

[34]  Boris Lenhard,et al.  Cohesin-based chromatin interactions enable regulated gene expression within preexisting architectural compartments , 2013, Genome research.

[35]  Barbara J Meyer,et al.  Condensin controls recruitment of RNA polymerase II to achieve nematode X-chromosome dosage compensation , 2013, eLife.

[36]  G. Schroth,et al.  Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[37]  J. Ahringer,et al.  Extreme HOT regions are CpG-dense promoters in C. elegans and humans , 2014, Genome research.

[38]  B. van Steensel,et al.  Differential spatial and structural organization of the X chromosome underlies dosage compensation in C. elegans , 2014, Genes & development.