Functionally graded bioactive coatings: reproducibility and stability of the coating under cell culture conditions.

This work sought to provide a basic protocol for treatment of functionally graded bioactive glass coatings (FGC) that reliably adhere to titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) prior to in vivo evaluation. The effect of the fabrication process on glass structure and reproducibility of the coating's properties, and the effect of cell culture conditions on the integrity of the coating were assessed. The structure of FGCs was compared to that of the as cast glass used as a top coating. X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed that the fabrication process resulted in 5.9+/-3.0 vol.% crystallization, while glass as cast was amorphous. Glass as cast and coatings behaved similarly in simulated body fluid (SBF): an amorphous layer rich in phosphate formed, and it crystallized, over 4 weeks, into apatite-like mineral (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), XRD, scanning electron microscopy (SEM)). Reproducibility of the fabrication process was tested from three batches of coatings by measuring thickness and crystallinity. MC3T3-E1.4 mouse pre-osteoblast cells were cultured and induced to mineralize on FGCs, either as made or pre-conditioned in SBF. The sub-surface glass silica network in FGCs was compromised by cell culture conditions. A crystalline phosphate was formed during pre-conditioning (XRD, FTIR, and SEM). SBF-pre-conditioning stabilized the coatings. Thus incubation in SBF is recommended to produce a stable coating.

[1]  R. Gruber,et al.  Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Osteoblast‐like MC3T3‐E1 Cells: Changes of Bradykinin‐Induced Prostaglandin E2 Production During Osteoblast Maturation , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  S. Radin,et al.  Effect of bioactive ceramic composition and structure on in vitro behavior. III. Porous versus dense ceramics. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  R. Jaffin,et al.  The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[4]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  Effect of bioadctive glass templates on osteoblast proliferation and in vitro synthesis of bone‐like tissue , 1994 .

[5]  J. Elliott,et al.  Structure and chemistry of the apatites and other calcium orthophosphates , 1994 .

[6]  G W Marshall,et al.  In vitro behavior of silicate glass coatings on Ti6A14V. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[7]  P Ducheyne,et al.  Effect of surface reaction stage on fibronectin-mediated adhesion of osteoblast-like cells to bioactive glass. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  Bioactive material template for in vitro synthesis of bone. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  I. Silver,et al.  Interactions of bioactive glasses with osteoblasts in vitro: effects of 45S5 Bioglass, and 58S and 77S bioactive glasses on metabolism, intracellular ion concentrations and cell viability. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[10]  R. Franceschi,et al.  Effects of ascorbic acid on collagen matrix formation and osteoblast differentiation in murine MC3T3‐E1 cells , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  K. Bachus,et al.  Postmortem comparative analysis of titanium and hydroxyapatite porous-coated femoral implants retrieved from the same patient. A case study. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  K. Bundy,et al.  Toxicity measurement of orthopedic implant alloy degradation products using a bioluminescent bacterial assay. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  E. Saiz,et al.  Glass-based coatings for titanium implant alloys. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  L. Hench,et al.  Dose-dependent behavior of bioactive glass dissolution. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  L. Quarles,et al.  Distinct proliferative and differentiated stages of murine MC3T3‐E1 cells in culture: An in vitro model of osteoblast development , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  D. Shi,et al.  The effect of structural characteristics on the in vitro bioactivity of hydroxyapatite. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  P. Krebsbach,et al.  Isolation and Characterization of MC3T3‐E1 Preosteoblast Subclones with Distinct In Vitro and In Vivo Differentiation/Mineralization Potential , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[18]  T. Kokubo,et al.  REVIEW Bioactive metals: preparation and properties , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[19]  R. Staehle,et al.  Crevice corrosion in orthopedic implant metals. , 1977, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.

[20]  J. B. Park,et al.  Biomechanical and morphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinity. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[21]  H. Ohgushi,et al.  Osteogenic differentiation of cultured marrow stromal stem cells on the surface of bioactive glass ceramics. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  T Kitsugi,et al.  Ca,P-rich layer formed on high-strength bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[23]  Xing‐dong Zhang,et al.  Dissolution and mineralization behaviors of HA coatings. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[24]  S. Radin,et al.  The effect of calcium phosphate ceramic composition and structure on in vitro behavior. I. Dissolution. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  P Ducheyne,et al.  Bioactive glass particulate material as a filler for bone lesions. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[26]  R. Franceschi,et al.  Relationship between collagen synthesis and expression of the osteoblast phenotype in MC3T3‐E1 cells , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  P Ducheyne,et al.  Calcium phosphate ceramic coatings on porous titanium: effect of structure and composition on electrophoretic deposition, vacuum sintering and in vitro dissolution. , 1990, Biomaterials.

[28]  L L Hench,et al.  In vitro dissolution of melt-derived 45S5 and sol-gel derived 58S bioactive glasses. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[29]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bioglass ®45S5 Stimulates Osteoblast Turnover and Enhances Bone Formation In Vitro: Implications and Applications for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[30]  S. Radin,et al.  The effect of in vitro modeling conditions on the surface reactions of bioactive glass. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[31]  L. Castleman,et al.  Biocompatibility of nitinol alloy as an implant material. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  Bioactive glass particles of narrow size range for the treatment of oral bone defects: a 1-24 month experiment with several materials and particle sizes and size ranges. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[33]  R. Craig,et al.  Strategies to affect bone remodeling: Osteointegration , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[34]  S. Radin,et al.  In vitro transformation of bioactive glass granules into Ca-P shells. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[35]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Engineering materials 1: an introduction to their properties and applications , 1996 .

[36]  Y. Amagai,et al.  In vitro differentiation and calcification in a new clonal osteogenic cell line derived from newborn mouse calvaria , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  G. Marshall,et al.  Novel bioactive functionally graded coatings on Ti6Al4V , 2000 .

[38]  G W Marshall,et al.  Bioactive glass coatings with hydroxyapatite and Bioglass particles on Ti-based implants. 1. Processing. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[39]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  Formation of surface reaction products on bioactive glass and their effects on the expression of the osteoblastic phenotype and the deposition of mineralized extracellular matrix. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[40]  L L Hench,et al.  Solution effects on the surface reactions of three bioactive glass compositions. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[41]  G. Marshall,et al.  The influence of novel bioactive glasses on in vitro osteoblast behavior. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.