Determining Bit-Error Rate When Utilizing Series-Connected Inverters as a Communications Channel

Synchronization in the AC-stacked PV-inverter topology has been shown utilizing powerline communication where a low-bandwidth synchronization signal is transmitted from the grid interface to a receiver in each inverter allowing the controls to obtain the necessary phase alignment to the grid voltage that allows for them to operate completely autonomously. The authors have been developing a channel model to describe the transmission and reception of this synchronization signal as it propagates down the powerline and the series connected power-electronic devices. This paper builds upon this model and examines the effects of the noise in the channel as it affects the reliability of the receiver to accurately determine if the synchronization signal is correct. Such reliability is key to the decentralized control of the AC-stacked PV-inverter topology. With the channel model that can determine the amount of transmitted current and the noise in the system, a power optimized transmission can be established that remains in an acceptable operating limit for reliability. Even though the results are for the AC-stacked PV-inverter architecture, the model is generalized enough for applicable for any series-connected power electronics.

[1]  Namwon Kim,et al.  Performance and mitigation strategy of distributed AC-stacked PV inverter architecture under grid background harmonics , 2017, 2017 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[2]  Namwon Kim,et al.  A distributed active and reactive power control strategy for balancing grid-tied cascaded H-bridge PV inverter system , 2017, 2017 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[3]  Robert Cox,et al.  Channel Modeling for Powerline Communications in Series-Connected PV Inverters , 2018, 2018 9th IEEE International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG).

[4]  Jing Lin,et al.  Local Utility Power Line Communications in the 3–500 kHz Band: Channel Impairments, Noise, and Standards , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[5]  Babak Parkhideh,et al.  Hybrid Current-/Voltage-Mode Control Scheme for Distributed AC-Stacked PV Inverter With Low-Bandwidth Communication Requirements , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  Iman Mazhari,et al.  Design and implementation of distributed control architecture of an AC-stacked PV inverter , 2015, 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[7]  Fang Zheng Peng,et al.  Multilevel inverters: a survey of topologies, controls, and applications , 2002, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[8]  Babak Parkhideh,et al.  Decentralized Active and Reactive Power Control for an AC-Stacked PV Inverter With Single Member Phase Compensation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[9]  Babak Parkhideh,et al.  Controller robustness analysis of grid-tied AC-stacked PV inverter system considering manufacturing inaccuracies , 2017, 2017 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC).

[10]  Robert Cox,et al.  Series-Connected Power Electronics as a Communication Medium , 2018, 2018 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[11]  Namwon Kim,et al.  Analysis of smart inverter functions of decentralized grid-connected AC-stacked PV inverter architecture , 2017, 2017 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC).

[12]  Robert Cox,et al.  Powerline communications strategy enabling fully decentralized control of AC-stacked PV inverters , 2017, 2017 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[13]  Massimo Vitelli,et al.  Distributed maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic arrays: Novel approach and system analysis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  希贝希斯·博瓦米克 Systems and methods for solar photovoltaic energy collection and conversion , 2012 .