Facilitating new forms of discourse for learning and teaching: harnessing the power of Web 2.0 practices

When asked what they would find most helpful to enable them to use technologies more in their teaching, most teachers say ‘give me examples, in my subject area’ and ‘point me to relevant people I can discuss these issues with’. Web 2.0 technologies – with their emphasis on sharing, networking and user production – seem to offer a potential solution. However uptake and use of Web 2.0 sites such as blogs, social networking and wikis by teachers for sharing and discussing practice has being marginal so far. This paper focuses on work we are undertaking as part of the Open University Learning Design Initiative (http://ouldi.open.ac.uk) and the Hewlett‐funded Olnet initiative (http://olnet.org). A key focus of our work is the development of tools, methods and approaches to support the design of innovative learning activities and open educational resources. In this paper I want to focus on one strand of our work; namely, how to leverage technologies to promote better sharing and discussion of learning and teaching ideas and designs.

[1]  Pierre Lévy,et al.  Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace , 1997 .

[2]  G. Conole Bridging the gap between policy and practice: a framework for technological intervention , 2010 .

[3]  Grainne Conole,et al.  The design of Cloudworks: Applying social networking practice to foster the exchange of learning and teaching ideas and designs , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Henry Jenkins Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[5]  G. Conole,et al.  An International Comparison of the Relationship between Policy and Practice in E-learning , 2007 .

[6]  Panagiota Alevizou,et al.  A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in Higher Education , 2010 .

[7]  M. Cole,et al.  The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky , 2007 .

[8]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Harnessing Technology: Transforming Learning and Children's Services , 2005 .

[9]  Brandon Muramatsu,et al.  Proceedings of the Workshop on Exchanging Experiences in Technology Enhanced Learning - What Went Wrong? What Went Right? WWWrong 2007, Sissi, Lassithi - Crete Greece, 17 September, 2007 , 2008, WWWrong.

[10]  Christine Redecker,et al.  Review of Learning 2.0 Practices: Study on the Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe , 2009 .

[11]  Jon Dron,et al.  Collectives, Networks and Groups in Social Software for E-Learning , 2007 .

[12]  Panagiota Alevizou,et al.  Ritual performances and collective intelligence: theoretical frameworks for analyising activity patterns in Cloudworks , 2010 .

[13]  A. Cockburn,et al.  Agile Software Development: The People Factor , 2001, Computer.

[14]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[15]  Peter Smith,et al.  Contemporary Perspectives in E‐learning Research: Themes, Methods and Impact on Practice , 2009 .

[16]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Cloudworks: Social networking for learning design , 2009 .

[17]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice , 2006 .

[18]  Grainne Conole,et al.  Chapter VIII The Role of Mediating Artefacts in Learning Design , 2008 .

[19]  Emilia Bértolo Web 2.0: Unlearned Lessons from Previous Virtual Learning Environments , 2008 .

[20]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Learners experiences: how pervasive and integrative tools influence expectations of study , 2010 .

[21]  Bryan N. Alexander Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning? , 2006 .

[22]  Wim Bouman,et al.  The Realm of Sociality: Notes on the Design of Social Software , 2007, ICIS.