Testing Two Contrasting Structural Models of Innovativeness in a Contractual Network

This study examined contrasting models of the impact of formal and informal structural factors and the communication environment on organizational innovativeness. Specifically, three formal structural variables (decentralization, formalization, and slack resources), two informal structural variables (range and prominence), and two communication environment variables (communication quality and acceptance) are posited to be antecedents of organizational innovativeness. In the traditional model, formal structural impacts are posited to be shaped by informal structure. Conversely, the coexisting model argues that both formal and informal structural variables directly affect the communication environment, which, in turn, shapes perceptions of innovativeness. Data were gathered from self-report questionnaires and network analysis communication logs completed by organizational members (N = 79) of a geographically dispersed government health information agency, the Cancer Information Service (CIS). Tests of the models demonstrate that the coexisting model is clearly superior. These results suggest that the dual role of formal and informal structures needs to be more systematically specified as we focus on innovation in new organizational forms, such as the CIS.

[1]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network str , 1990 .

[2]  Gabriel Weimann,et al.  The strength of weak conversational ties in the flow of information and influence , 1983 .

[3]  B. Indik,et al.  Organization Size and Member Participation , 1965 .

[4]  R. Kanter.  The change masters : innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation , 1984 .

[5]  M. Morra,et al.  History of the Cancer Information Service. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[6]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[7]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Communication and Innovation Implementation , 1984 .

[8]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[9]  W. Bennis.  Theory and Method in Applying Behavioral Science to Planned Organizational Change , 1965 .

[10]  D. Osborne,et al.  Reinventing Government: How the En-trepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector , 1992 .

[11]  J. Schopler.  Interorganizational Groups: Origins, Structure, and Outcomes , 1987 .

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  Innovations and Organizations , 1988 .

[13]  L. Wager.  Channels of Interpersonal and Mass Communication in an Organizational Setting: Studying the Diffusion of Information About a Unique Organizational Change , 1962 .

[14]  H. Kelman.  PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGE , 1961 .

[15]  R. Burt.  Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure , 1985 .

[16]  J. Brewer.  FLOW OF COMMUNICATIONS, EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS AND ORGANIZATIONAL AUTHORITY STRUCTURES * , 1971 .

[17]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Social Contagion and Multiplexity Communication Networks as Predictors of Commitment and Role Ambiguity , 1989 .

[18]  David Knoke,et al.  Measuring Organizational Structures and Environments , 1994 .

[19]  Gregory K. Dow.  Configurational and Coactivational Views of Organizational Structure , 1988 .

[20]  R. Luke,et al.  Quasi firms: strategic interorganizational forms in the health care industry. , 1989, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[21]  P. Blau,et al.  The Hierarchy of Authority in Organizations , 1968, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  M. Aiken,et al.  The Organic Organization and Innovation , 1971 .

[23]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision support systems: adaptive structuration theory and self-organizing systems theory , 1993 .

[24]  D. Dillman.  The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys , 1991 .

[25]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Formal and informal group communication structures: An examination of their relationship to role ambiguity , 1990 .

[26]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Effects of Communicative Factors on Participation in Innovations , 1990 .

[27]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Influence Modes, Schema Change, and Organizational Transformation , 1989 .

[28]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Do You Know Whom You Were with a Week Ago Friday? A Re-Analysis of the Bernard, Killworth, and Sailer Studies , 1990 .

[29]  D. Krackhardt.  Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[30]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication in Organizations , 1976 .

[31]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  Tactics of Implementation , 1986 .

[32]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations , 1994 .

[33]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[34]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Technical Communication in R & D Laboratories: The Impact of Project Work Characteristics , 1978 .

[35]  C. Midden,et al.  Communication Network Influences on Information Diffusion and Persuasion , 1991 .

[36]  L. Hayduk.  Structural equation modeling with LISREL , 1987 .

[37]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[38]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Organizational Communication Structure , 1993 .

[39]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation , 1996 .

[40]  L. Fry,et al.  Congruence, Contingency, and Theory Building , 1987 .

[41]  Vernon D. Miller,et al.  The Role of a Conference in Integrating a Contractual Network of Health Services Organizations , 1996 .

[42]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[43]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Communication and Motivational Predictors of the Dynamics of Organizational Innovation , 1992 .

[44]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[45]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[46]  William A. Donohue,et al.  Differences Between Formal and Informal Communication Channels , 1994 .

[47]  L. Wun,et al.  The Cancer Information Service Telephone Evaluation and Reporting System (CISTERS): a new tool for assessing quality assurance. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[48]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[49]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[50]  T. Albrecht,et al.  Communicating about innovation in networks of three U.S. organizations. , 1984 .

[51]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[53]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF NEW ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS , 1991 .

[54]  J. Pfeffer.  Organizations and Organization Theory , 1982 .

[55]  Gerald Zaltman,et al.  Innovation and Organizations. , 1974 .

[56]  P. Killworth,et al.  INFORMANT ACCURACY IN SOCIAL NETWORK DATA II , 1977 .

[57]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[58]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Approaches to organizational communication structure , 1992 .

[59]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[60]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Three Tiers for Innovation Research , 1988 .

[61]  L. K. Bragaw,et al.  Information flows, management styles, and technological innovation , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[62]  H. Hurt,et al.  SCALES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF INNOVATIVENESS , 1977 .

[63]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Measuring Patterns of Acquaintanceship [and Comments and Reply] , 1984, Current Anthropology.

[64]  Steven R. Corman,et al.  Perceived Networks, Activity Foci, and Observable Communication in Social Collectives , 1994 .

[65]  M. Arnold,et al.  Agency Problems in Planning for Community Health Needs , 1968 .