Fluctuation-Driven Flocking Movement in Three Dimensions and Scale-Free Correlation

Recent advances in the study of flocking behavior have permitted more sophisticated analyses than previously possible. The concepts of “topological distances” and “scale-free correlations” are important developments that have contributed to this improvement. These concepts require us to reconsider the notion of a neighborhood when applied to theoretical models. Previous work has assumed that individuals interact with neighbors within a certain radius (called the “metric distance”). However, other work has shown that, assuming topological interactions, starlings interact on average with the six or seven nearest neighbors within a flock. Accounting for this observation, we previously proposed a metric-topological interaction model in two dimensions. The goal of our model was to unite these two interaction components, the metric distance and the topological distance, into one rule. In our previous study, we demonstrated that the metric-topological interaction model could explain a real bird flocking phenomenon called scale-free correlation, which was first reported by Cavagna et al. In this study, we extended our model to three dimensions while also accounting for variations in speed. This three-dimensional metric-topological interaction model displayed scale-free correlation for velocity and orientation. Finally, we introduced an additional new feature of the model, namely, that a flock can store and release its fluctuations.

[1]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[2]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Collective Information Processing and Pattern Formation in Swarms, Flocks, and Crowds , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[3]  I. Aoki A simulation study on the schooling mechanism in fish. , 1982 .

[4]  A. Huth,et al.  The simulation of the movement of fish schools , 1992 .

[5]  Jüri Allik,et al.  Interactions between area and numerosity , 1988, Psychological research.

[6]  J. Buck,et al.  Mechanism of Rhythmic Synchronous Flashing of Fireflies , 1968, Science.

[7]  N. Makris,et al.  Critical Population Density Triggers Rapid Formation of Vast Oceanic Fish Shoals , 2009, Science.

[8]  G. Parisi,et al.  Scale-free correlations in starling flocks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Neha Bhooshan,et al.  The Simulation of the Movement of Fish Schools , 2001 .

[10]  Christian A. Yates,et al.  Inherent noise can facilitate coherence in collective swarm motion , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  D. Sumpter The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Daniel W Franks,et al.  Making noise: emergent stochasticity in collective motion. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[14]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Use of Number by Fish , 2009, PloS one.

[15]  L. Leon,et al.  The sound of many hands clapping , 2022 .

[16]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Density distribution and size sorting in fish schools: an individual-based model , 2005 .

[17]  Lutz Schimansky-Geier,et al.  Swarming in three dimensions. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  H. Chaté,et al.  Active and passive particles: modeling beads in a bacterial bath. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[20]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Some Causes of the Variable Shape of Flocks of Birds , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Transitions in a self-propelled-particles model with coupling of accelerations. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Daniel W Franks,et al.  Limited interactions in flocks: relating model simulations to empirical data , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Collective behavior of interacting self-propelled particles , 2000, cond-mat/0611742.

[24]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-Organized Shape and Frontal Density of Fish Schools , 2008 .

[25]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  Self-Organized Fish Schools: An Examination of Emergent Properties , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[26]  I. Giardina Collective Animal Behavior David J.T. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  G. Parisi,et al.  Empirical investigation of starling flocks: a benchmark study in collective animal behaviour , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  T. Niizato,et al.  Metric-topological interaction model of collective behavior , 2011 .

[29]  T. Niizato,et al.  Are the Flocks Critical Phenomena , 2010 .

[30]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Inferring individual rules from collective behavior , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  Y. Tu,et al.  Moving and staying together without a leader , 2003, cond-mat/0401257.

[33]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[34]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  H. Chaté,et al.  Relevance of metric-free interactions in flocking phenomena. , 2010, Physical review letters.