Sensitivity and evolution of sea‐turtle magnetoreception: observations, modelling and constraints from geomagnetic secular variation

In a series of papers, Lohmann and Lohmann (1991, 1994a, 1994b, 1996) provide evidence for remarkable sensitivity of sea-turtles to the earth's magnetic field and suggest that it is used by these animals to determine global position and to navigate. In this paper, we emphasize that a consequence of these observations taken together is that sea-turtles should be able to accurately detect the full (vector) magnetic-field, and perhaps spatial gradients. In order to interpret these observations, we propose a simple model in which the turtle is considered as a small permanent magnet, on which the geomagnetic field exerts a torque. This torque varies as a function of turtle azimuth and field parameters which depend mainly on latitude. Although this simple model accounts for some of the observational evidence, discrepancies might be due to a number of other factors, such as speed of magnetic field changes during experiments or lack of field homogeneity. Also, the earth's field has varied significantly over the last few centuries and some of the magnetic features observed today and suggested by the Lohmanns for use in sea-turtle navigation were very different or even not present two or three centuries ago. This would place constraints on the rate at which genetically inherited magnetic behavioural preferences can change with time. Alternately, it may imply that the experimental results need to be re-evaluated and complemented.

[1]  J. Kirschvink,et al.  Comment on "Constraints on biological effects of weak extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields" , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[2]  J. Kirschvink,et al.  Evidence that fin whales respond to the geomagnetic field during migration. , 1992, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  J. Kirschvink,et al.  Ultrastructure, morphology and organization of biogenic magnetite from sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka: implications for magnetoreception. , 1988, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  Dr. Roswitha Wiltschko,et al.  Magnetic Orientation in Animals , 1995, Zoophysiology.

[5]  Time of the turtle , 1979 .

[6]  R. Beason,et al.  Responses to small magnetic variations by the trigeminal system of the bobolink , 1990, Brain Research Bulletin.

[7]  K. Lohmann Magnetic orientation by hatchling loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta). , 1991, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  W. Wiltschko,et al.  Magnetic information affects the stellar orientation of young bird migrants , 1996, Nature.

[9]  Kenneth J. Lohmann,et al.  Detection of magnetic field intensity by sea turtles , 1996, Nature.

[10]  John C. Montgomery,et al.  Structure and function of the vertebrate magnetic sense , 1997, Nature.

[11]  Lohmann ACQUISITION OF MAGNETIC DIRECTIONAL PREFERENCE IN HATCHLING LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLES , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  J. L. Gould,et al.  The case for magnetic sensitivity in birds and bees (such as it is). , 1980 .

[13]  Joseph L. Kirschvink,et al.  Is Geomagnetic Sensitivity Real? Replication of the Walker-Bitterman Magnetic Conditioning Experiment in Honey Bees , 1991 .

[14]  J. Kirschvink,et al.  Magnetite biomineralization and magnetoreception in organisms : a new biomagnetism , 1985 .

[15]  Beason,et al.  Behavioural evidence for the use of magnetic material in magnetoreception by a migratory bird , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  Susan Y. Schwartz,et al.  Depth distribution of moment release in underthrusting earthquakes at subduction zones , 1992 .

[17]  Lohmann DETECTION OF MAGNETIC INCLINATION ANGLE BY SEA TURTLES: A POSSIBLE MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING LATITUDE , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.