How Does Openness to Innovation Drive Organizational Ambidexterity? The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Goal Orientation

A firm cannot effectively relieve the tension in resource allocation for organizational ambidexterity by relying solely on internal resources. External sources of innovation are required. Based on knowledge-based view, this study aims to address the effect of open innovation (OI) on organizational ambidexterity, and explore the internal context that captures the benefits of both inbound and outbound OI. Empirical results from our study on 195 Chinese firms in high-tech industries show that both inbound and outbound knowledge flows are enablers of ambidexterity. Moreover, the benefits of OI for ambidexterity can be fully captured only when the firm has a collective learning goal orientation (LGO). These findings highlight the importance of interorganizational knowledge flows on organizational development and open the black box of how this relationship can be realized by proposing an intraorganizational LGO as the mediator. This study enriches the understanding of the antecedents of ambidexterity by exploring the interplay between internal and external processes.

[1]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[2]  Michel Ferrary,et al.  Specialized organizations and ambidextrous clusters in the open innovation paradigm , 2011 .

[3]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[4]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  Hsing-Er Lin,et al.  Investigating the Role of Leadership and Organizational Culture in Fostering Innovation Ambidexterity , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Kuang-Peng Hung,et al.  Exploring Open Search Strategies and Perceived Innovation Performance from the Perspective of Inter-Organizational Knowledge Flows , 2010 .

[8]  Jessica Koehler,et al.  Open Innovation The New Imperative For Creating And Profiting From Technology , 2016 .

[9]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Why and How Combining Strong and Weak Ties within a Single Interorganizational R&D Collaboration Outperforms Other Collaboration Structures† , 2013 .

[10]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Desirée Knoppen,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY IN BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF ITS MEDIATING ROLE , 2014 .

[12]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Lena Abrahamsson,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Firms’ Process Innovation Capability: A Literature Review and a Conceptual Framework , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Outbound Open Innovation and its Effect on Firm Performance: Examining Environmental Influences , 2009 .

[15]  Antero Kutvonen.  Strategic application of outbound open innovation , 2011 .

[16]  G. Slowinski,et al.  Harnessing External Technology for Innovation , 2006 .

[17]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Felix T Mavondo,et al.  Performance or learning goal orientation: Implications for business performance , 2014 .

[19]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[20]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[21]  Keld Laursen,et al.  Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[22]  J. Farh,et al.  Employee Learning Orientation, Transformational Leadership, and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Employee Creative Self-Efficacy , 2009 .

[23]  Sebastian Kortmann,et al.  The mediating role of strategic orientations on the relationship between ambidexterity-oriented decisions and innovative ambidexterity , 2015 .

[24]  Zhi Yang,et al.  Discipline versus passion: Collectivism, centralization, and ambidextrous innovation , 2015 .

[25]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Balance Within and Across Domains: The Performance Implications of Exploration and Exploitation in Alliances , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Yi-Chia Chiu,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Supply Chain Portfolios , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[27]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Ambidexterity Under Scrutiny: Exploration and Exploitation Via Internal Organization, Alliances, and Acquisitions , 2014 .

[28]  Deepa Chandrasekaran,et al.  Open innovation, product portfolio innovativeness and firm performance: the dual role of new product development capabilities , 2016 .

[29]  Ye Dai,et al.  Ambidexterity in new ventures: The impact of new product development alliances and transactive memory systems , 2017 .

[30]  G. Duysters,et al.  Networking as a Means to Strategy Change: The Case of Open Innovation in Mobile Telephony , 2007 .

[31]  Tommy Høyvarde Clausen,et al.  Modes of innovation, resources and their influence on product innovation: Empirical evidence from R&D active firms in Norway , 2013 .

[32]  Raffaella Manzini,et al.  Innovation ambidexterity of open firms. The role of internal relational social capital , 2017, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[33]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[34]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[35]  Colin C. J. Cheng,et al.  Effects of open innovation and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities on radical innovation , 2016 .

[36]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[37]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[38]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit , 2011 .

[39]  Antonello Cammarano,et al.  Open Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An Empirical Analysis on Context Features, Internal R&D, and Financial Performances , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[40]  U. Lichtenthaler.  OpenInnovation:rentDebates,andFutureDirections , 2011 .

[41]  Terry C. Blum,et al.  Assessing the Non-Random Sampling Effects of Subject Attrition in Longitudinal Research , 1996 .

[42]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[43]  Angeloantonio Russo,et al.  Cross‐boundary ambidexterity: Balancing exploration and exploitation in the fuel cell industry , 2010 .

[44]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  External technology commercialisation projects: objectives, processes and a typology , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[45]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[46]  Helle Alsted Søndergaard,et al.  Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices , 2014 .

[47]  Anne L. J. Ter Wal,et al.  Coping with Open Innovation: Responding to the Challenges of External Engagement in R&D , 2014 .

[48]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[49]  D. Vandewalle.  Development and Validation of a Work Domain Goal Orientation Instrument , 1997 .

[50]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[51]  Yiannis E. Spanos,et al.  An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective , 2001 .

[52]  Yansong Hu,et al.  Outbound open innovation in bio-pharmaceutical out-licensing , 2015 .

[53]  Marco Greco,et al.  An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance , 2016 .

[54]  George P. Huber,et al.  Cross-Understanding: Implications for Group Cognition and Performance , 2010 .

[55]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[56]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Dynamic Client Portfolios as Sources of Ambidexterity: Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Client Relationships , 2016 .

[57]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[58]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[59]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[60]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Sue Newell,et al.  Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity , 2015 .

[62]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[63]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[64]  Kira Fabrizio,et al.  Using users: When does external knowledge enhance corporate product innovation? , 2014 .

[65]  Olli-Pekka Kauppila,et al.  Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships , 2010 .

[66]  Ingrid C. Chadwick,et al.  Motivating Organizations to Learn , 2015 .

[67]  M. Schulz.  THE UNCERTAIN RELEVANCE OF NEWNESS: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE FLOWS , 2001 .

[68]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership , 2008 .

[69]  M. Bogers,et al.  Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation , 2014 .

[70]  C. Chou,et al.  The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence , 2013 .

[71]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  Managing the Exploitation/Exploration Paradox: The Role of a Learning Capability and Innovation Ambidexterity , 2013 .

[72]  Zeki Simsek.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding , 2009 .

[73]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[74]  S. Koruna,et al.  External technology commercialization: policy guidelines , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[75]  Helle Alsted Søndergaard,et al.  Using Internal Coupling Activities To Enhance The Effectiveness Of Open Innovation , 2013 .