Supporting medical communication for older patients with a shared touch-screen computer

OBJECTIVE Increasingly health care facilities are adopting electronic medical record systems and installing computer workstations in patient exam rooms. The introduction of computer workstations into the medical interview process makes it important to consider the impact of such technology on older patients as well as new types of interfaces that may better suit the needs of older adults. While many older adults are comfortable with a traditional computer workstation with a keyboard and mouse, this article explores how a large horizontal touch-screen (i.e., a surface computer) may suit the needs of older patients and facilitates the doctor-patient interview process. METHOD Twenty older adults (age 60 to 88) used a prototype multiuser, multitouch system in our research laboratory to examine seven health care scenarios. Behavioral observations as well as results from questionnaires and a structured interview were analyzed. RESULTS The older adults quickly adapted to the prototype system and reported that it was easy to use. Participants also suggested that having a shared view of one's medical records, especially charts and images, would enhance communication with their doctor and aid understanding. CONCLUSION While this study is exploratory and some areas of interaction with a surface computer need to be refined, the technology is promising for sharing electronic patient information during medical interviews involving older adults. Future work must examine doctors' and nurses' interaction with the technology as well as logistical issues of installing such a system in a real world medical setting.

[1]  Kaija Saranto,et al.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  Christopher Lawrence,et al.  Doctor , 1871, The Lancet.

[3]  C Meyerhoff,et al.  Long-term experiences with a computerized diabetes management and glucose monitoring system in insulin-dependent diabetic patients. , 1994, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[4]  R. Nahm,et al.  Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. , 2000, Computers in nursing.

[5]  A. Beisecker,et al.  Aging and the desire for information and input in medical decisions: patient consumerism in medical encounters. , 1988, The Gerontologist.

[6]  이영식.  Communication 으로서의 영어교육 , 1986 .

[7]  Zvisinei Sandi.  DEFINITION , 1961, A Philosopher Looks at Sport.

[8]  Erin E. Dooley.  American Society on Aging , 2003 .

[9]  J F Gallelli,et al.  Patient-interactive computer system for obtaining medication histories. , 1993, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[10]  L L Kupper,et al.  Communication, compliance, and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications. , 1976, American journal of public health.

[11]  James D. Robinson,et al.  The older patient-physician interaction. , 2004 .

[12]  M. Stewart.  Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[13]  C. Helmick,et al.  Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  Jon F. Nussbaum,et al.  Handbook of Communication and Aging Research , 2004 .

[15]  Gregory Makoul,et al.  Research Paper: The Use of Electronic Medical Records: Communication Patterns in Outpatient Encounters , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  Darren Leigh,et al.  DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology , 2001, UIST '01.

[17]  M. Haug,et al.  Issues in Elderly Patient-Provider Interactions , 1987, Research on aging.

[18]  Mark D. Schwartz,et al.  Computers in the Exam Room: Differences in Physician–Patient Interaction May Be Due to Physician Experience , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[19]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[20]  James D. Hollan,et al.  SLAP widgets: bridging the gap between virtual and physical controls on tabletops , 2009, CHI.

[21]  Frank A Sloan,et al.  Longitudinal prevalence of major eye diseases. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  Roger W. Morrell,et al.  Processing of Medical information in Aging Patients : Cognitive and Human Factors Perspectives , 1999 .

[23]  Christopher Pearce,et al.  Doctor, patient and computer - A framework for the new consultation , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[24]  W L Holzemer,et al.  Computer-supported versus manually-generated nursing care plans: a comparison of patient problems, nursing interventions, and AIDS patient outcomes. , 1992, Computers in nursing.

[25]  J. Halter,et al.  The Challenge of Communicating Health Information to Elderly Patients: A View From Geriatric Medicine , 1999 .