Complete post-separation of overlapping ultrasonic signals by combining hard and soft modeling.

In some ultrasonic measurement situations, an adequate signal separation is difficult to achieve. A typical situation is material characterization of thin media using pulse-echo or through-transmission techniques, when the time-of-flight in the media is shorter than the emitted signal's time support. Separated signals are necessary to obtain accurate estimates of material properties and transit times. In this paper a new method is proposed that enables complete post-separation of measured coinciding signals. The method is based on a combination of hard physical and soft empirical models, which allows for a description of both known and unknown properties making a complete separation possible. The validity and limitations of the model and the separation results are thoroughly addressed. The proposed technique is verified using real measurements on thin dispersive samples and validated using residual analysis. The experimental results show a complete separation with uncorrelated and normally distributed residuals. The method enables characterization and/or flow analysis in difficult overlapping situations.

[1]  D. Tabor,et al.  An utrasonic study of the area of contact between stationary and sliding surfaces , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  J. Rissanen,et al.  Modeling By Shortest Data Description* , 1978, Autom..

[3]  Pierre-André Farine,et al.  A novel homomorphic processing of ultrasonic echoes for layer thickness measurement , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[4]  Johan E. Carlson,et al.  Separation of Dispersive Coinciding Signals by combining Hard and Soft modeling , 2007 .

[5]  Boaz Porat,et al.  A course in digital signal processing , 1996 .

[6]  P. Cawley,et al.  A study of the interaction between ultrasound and a partially contacting solid—solid interface , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  R. Fletcher Practical Methods of Optimization , 1988 .

[8]  Ehud Weinstein,et al.  Parameter estimation of superimposed signals using the EM algorithm , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[9]  R. Freemantle,et al.  A z-transform technique for thin-layer reverberation cancellation applied to ultrasonic NDT of adhered structures , 1994 .

[10]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[11]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[13]  S. Rokhlin,et al.  Determination of embedded layer properties using adaptive time-frequency domain analysis. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes , 1952 .

[15]  Vikram K. Kinra,et al.  Ultrasonic measurement of the thickness, phase velocity, density or attenuation of a thin-viscoelastic plate. Part II: the inverse problem , 1995 .

[16]  R. Graaff,et al.  A simple and accurate formula for the sound velocity in water. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.

[18]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  On the estimation of transfer functions , 1985, Autom..

[19]  J. Carlson,et al.  Frequency and temperature dependence of acoustic properties of polymers used in pulse-echo systems , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003.

[20]  J. Saniie,et al.  Model-based estimation of ultrasonic echoes. Part I: Analysis and algorithms , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  Model-based phase velocity and attenuation estimation in wideband ultrasonic measurement systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.