A new texture and shape based technique for improving meningioma classification

Over the past decade, computer‐aided diagnosis is rapidly growing due to the availability of patient data, sophisticated image acquisition tools and advancement in image processing and machine learning algorithms. Meningiomas are the tumors of brain and spinal cord. They account for 20% of all the brain tumors. Meningioma subtype classification involves the classification of benign meningioma into four major subtypes: meningothelial, fibroblastic, transitional, and psammomatous. Under the microscope, the histology images of these four subtypes show a variety of textural and structural characteristics. High intraclass and low interclass variabilities in meningioma subtypes make it an extremely complex classification problem. A number of techniques have been proposed for meningioma subtype classification with varying performances on different subtypes. Most of these techniques employed wavelet packet transforms for textural features extraction and analysis of meningioma histology images. In this article, a hybrid classification technique based on texture and shape characteristics is proposed for the classification of meningioma subtypes. Meningothelial and fibroblastic subtypes are classified on the basis of nuclei shapes while grey‐level co‐occurrence matrix textural features are used to train a multilayer perceptron for the classification of transitional and psammomatous subtypes. On the whole, average classification accuracy of 92.50% is achieved through the proposed hybrid classifier; which to the best of our knowledge is the highest. Microsc. Res. Tech. 77:862–873, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Ali Shokoufandeh,et al.  Shock Graphs and Shape Matching , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[2]  Nasir M. Rajpoot,et al.  Comparative analysis of spatial and transform domain methods for meningioma subtype classification , 2010 .

[3]  Po-Whei Huang,et al.  Effective segmentation and classification for HCC biopsy images , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  A. Madabhushi Digital pathology image analysis: opportunities and challenges. , 2009, Imaging in medicine.

[5]  Alberto Orfao,et al.  Early recurrences in histologically benign/grade I meningiomas are associated with large tumors and coexistence of monosomy 14 and del(1p36) in the ancestral tumor cell clone. , 2007, Neuro-oncology.

[6]  Omar S. Al-Kadi,et al.  Texture measures combination for improved meningioma classification of histopathological images , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  Omar S. Al-Kadi A fractal dimension based optimal wavelet packet analysis technique for classification of meningioma brain tumours , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[8]  Thomas M. Breuel,et al.  Automated Feature Selection for the Classification of Meningioma Cell Nuclei , 2006, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.

[9]  Patrick Warnat,et al.  Customized oligonucleotide microarray gene expression-based classification of neuroblastoma patients outperforms current clinical risk stratification. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Metin Nafi Gürcan,et al.  Adaptive Discriminant Wavelet Packet Transform and Local Binary Patterns for Meningioma Subtype Classification , 2008, MICCAI.

[12]  J. Jan Medical Image Processing, Reconstruction and Restoration: Concepts and Methods , 2005 .

[13]  Reyer Zwiggelaar,et al.  Meningioma subtype classification using morphology features and random forests , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[14]  Metin Nafi Gürcan,et al.  Computerized classification of intraductal breast lesions using histopathological images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Ali Shokoufandeh,et al.  View-based 3-D object recognition using shock graphs , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[16]  Mark A. Hall,et al.  Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning , 2003 .

[17]  Benjamin B. Kimia,et al.  A Similarity-Based Aspect-Graph Approach to 3D Object Recognition , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[18]  Julius T. Tou,et al.  Pattern Recognition Principles , 1974 .

[19]  Jun Kong,et al.  Computer-aided prognosis of neuroblastoma on whole-slide images: Classification of stromal development , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  H. Blum Biological shape and visual science (part I) , 1973 .

[21]  Sandrine Florquin,et al.  Interobserver agreement of scoring of histopathological characteristics and classification of lupus nephritis. , 2007, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[22]  Sven J. Dickinson,et al.  Skeleton based shape matching and retrieval , 2003, 2003 Shape Modeling International..

[23]  Tim W. Nattkemper,et al.  Feature-space exploration of pathology images using content-based database visualization , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  Nasir M. Rajpoot,et al.  Classification of meningiomas using discriminant wavelet packets and learning vector quantization , 2006 .

[25]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[26]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system , 2007, Acta Neuropathologica.

[27]  Philip N. Klein,et al.  Recognition of Shapes by Editing Shock Graphs , 2001, ICCV.

[28]  David J. Kupfer,et al.  The Dana Guide to Brain Health , 2002 .

[29]  Ian F. Pollack,et al.  Pathologist Interobserver Variability of Histologic Features in Childhood Brain Tumors: Results from the CCG-945 Study , 2008, Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society.

[30]  Jin Tae Kwak,et al.  Multimodal microscopy for automated histologic analysis of prostate cancer , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[31]  James Shuttleworth,et al.  Learning Histopathological Microscopy , 2005, ICAPR.

[32]  Mrs. S. P. Hingway,et al.  An Improved Shock Graph for an Improved Object Recognition , 2011 .

[34]  Hideaki Mizuno,et al.  Molecular classification of prostate cancer using curated expression signatures , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Gyan Bhanot,et al.  Computerized Image-Based Detection and Grading of Lymphocytic Infiltration in HER2+ Breast Cancer Histopathology , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  L. Pusztai,et al.  Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction , 2011, The Lancet.

[37]  Nasir M. Rajpoot,et al.  Comparative analysis of discriminant wavelet packet features and raw image features for classification of meningioma subtypes , 2007 .

[38]  Metin Nafi Gürcan,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection of Centroblasts for Follicular Lymphoma Grading Using Adaptive Likelihood-Based Cell Segmentation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  L. Egevad,et al.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[40]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  A shock grammar for recognition , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[41]  Nasir M. Rajpoot,et al.  Optimal Wavelet Basis for Wavelet Packets based Meningioma Subtype Classification , 2008 .

[42]  Nasir M. Rajpoot,et al.  A Robust Adaptive Wavelet-based Method for Classification of Meningioma Histology Images , 2009 .

[43]  Tim W. Nattkemper,et al.  A method for linking computed image features to histological semantics in neuropathology , 2007, J. Biomed. Informatics.