Empirical Corrections for Basin Effects in Stochastic Ground-Motion Prediction

Amplification corrections are presented for the finite-fault stochastic ground-motion simulation model; these corrections represent the total effect of the Los Angeles basin on the ground-motion spectra. Spectral amplification ratios were calculated by dividing the observed spectra for the 1994 Northridge and 1987 Whittier Narrows earthquakes, including shear- and basin-generated waves, by the simulated spectra created assuming an average rock-site condition. Smoothed amplification data were plotted above 3D images of the basin revealing a general correlation between the estimated basin depth and total basin amplification for both earthquakes over three frequency ranges: low (0.2-2 Hz), intermediate (2-8 Hz), and high (8-12.5 Hz). The depth-dependent corrections are derived from the regression of the combined data from both earthquakes in order to reduce an uncertainty caused by the azimuth of incoming waves. Ground-motion duration is defined as the time for 95% of the acceleration spectral energy to pass after the S -wave arrival. Due to ambiguity in defining a basin parameter controlling duration, it was impossible to develop a generic equation that would relate the duration ratio (observed/synthetic) to some characteristic of the basin. Users are cautioned, though, that the durations within the basin may be as much as four times longer than the simulated ones. The procedure is outlined for potential users who wish to use the results of this study in synthesizing more accurate earthquake ground motions, taking into account complicated basin-geometry and near-surface effects. The results are directly applicable to engineering simulation of strong ground motions in a sedimentary-basin environment. Manuscript received 21 May 2002.

[1]  Shawn Larsen,et al.  Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion: Comparison of methods and validation using strong-ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  Robert W. Graves,et al.  Ground-motion amplification in the Santa Monica area: Effects of shallow basin-edge structure , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  David Carver,et al.  First-generation site-response maps for the Los Angeles region based on earthquake ground motions , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Three-dimensional structure influences on the strong-motion wavefield of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake , 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[5]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Control of strong motion by the upper 30 meters , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Source Parameters of Earthquakes in Eastern and Western North America Based on Finite-Fault Modeling , 2002 .

[7]  Mariano García-Fernández,et al.  Calibration of stochastic finite-fault ground motion simulations for the 1997 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, earthquake sequence , 2000 .

[8]  Mario Ordaz,et al.  A Source and Wave Propagation Study of the Copalillo, Mexico, Earthquake of 21 July 2000 (Mw 5.9): Implications for Seismic Hazard in Mexico City from Inslab Earthquakes , 2002 .

[9]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Lens‐effect in Santa Monica? , 1998 .

[10]  Donald V. Helmberger,et al.  Elastic finite-difference modeling of the 1971 San Fernando , 1988 .

[11]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  STOCHASTIC PREDICTION OF GROUND MOTION AND SPECTRAL RESPONSE PARAMETERS AT HARD-ROCK SITES IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA , 1987 .

[12]  R. P. Maley,et al.  Accelerograms recorded at USGS National Strong-Motion Network stations during the Ms=6.6 Northridge, California earthquake of January 17, 1994 , 1994 .

[13]  Ezio Faccioli,et al.  Complex site effects and building codes: Making the leap , 2000 .

[14]  David Carver,et al.  Variability of site response in the Los Angeles urban area , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[15]  Edward H. Field,et al.  Accounting for Site Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III Report , 2000 .

[16]  Francesca Pacor,et al.  Stochastic Simulation of Strong-Motion Records from the 26 September 1997 (Mw 6), Umbria-Marche (Central Italy) Earthquake , 2001 .

[17]  Robert W. Graves,et al.  A standard three-dimensional seismic velocity model for southern California: version 1 , 1998 .

[18]  Gao,et al.  Northridge earthquake damage caused by geologic focusing of seismic waves , 2000, Science.

[19]  David M. Boore,et al.  Basin Waves on a Seafloor Recording of the 1990 Upland, California, Earthquake: Implications for Ground Motions from a Larger Earthquake , 1999 .

[20]  Robert W. Graves,et al.  The seismic response of the Los Angeles basin, California , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[21]  W. B. Joyner Strong motion from surface waves in deep sedimentary basins , 2000 .

[22]  G. Atkinson,et al.  FINSIM--a FORTRAN Program for Simulating Stochastic Acceleration Time Histories from Finite Faults , 1998 .

[23]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Site Amplification in the Los Angeles Basin from Three-Dimensional Modeling of Ground Motion , 2000 .

[24]  Anastasia Kiratzi,et al.  Stochastic Simulation of Strong-Motion Records from the 15 April 1979 (M 7.1) Montenegro Earthquake , 2002 .

[25]  Robert W. Graves,et al.  The SCEC Southern California Reference Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model Version 2 , 2000 .

[26]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of earthquakes on the Los Angeles fault system , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[27]  Stephen S. Gao,et al.  Localized amplification of seismic waves and correlation with damage due to the Northridge earthquake: Evidence for focusing in Santa Monica , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[28]  Kojiro Irikura,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of the near-fault ground motion for the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (Kobe), Japan, earthquake , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[29]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Strong Motion from Surface Waves in Deep Sedimentary Basins , 2000 .

[30]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Subevent structure of large earthquakes—A ground‐motion perspective , 2001 .

[31]  A. Shakal,et al.  CSMP strong-motion records from the Northridge, California Earthquake of 17 January 1994 , 1994 .

[32]  M. Mahdyiar,et al.  Are NEHRP and Earthquake-based Site Effects in Greater Los Angeles Compatible? , 2002 .

[33]  W. Silva,et al.  Stochastic Modeling of California Ground Motions , 2000 .

[34]  P. Bard,et al.  The two-dimensional resonance of sediment-filled valleys , 1985 .

[35]  F. Chávez-García,et al.  Site Effects and Design Provisions: The Case of Euroseistest , 2001 .

[36]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Dynamic Simulation of the 1992 Landers Earthquake , 1997 .

[37]  Pierre-Yves Bard,et al.  The seismic response of sediment-filled valleys. Part 2. The case of incident P and SV waves , 1980 .

[38]  G. R. Toro,et al.  Model of Strong Ground Motions from Earthquakes in Central and Eastern North America: Best Estimates and Uncertainties , 1997 .