Like/dislike analysis using EEG: Determination of most discriminative channels and frequencies

In this study, we have analyzed electroencephalography (EEG) signals to investigate the following issues, (i) which frequencies and EEG channels could be relatively better indicators of preference (like or dislike decisions) of consumer products, (ii) timing characteristic of "like" decisions during such mental processes. For this purpose, we have obtained multichannel EEG recordings from 15 subjects, during total of 16 epochs of 10 s long, while they were presented with some shoe photographs. When they liked a specific shoe, they pressed on a button and marked the time of this activity and the particular epoch was labeled as a LIKE case. No button press meant that the subject did not like the particular shoe that was displayed and corresponding epoch designated as a DISLIKE case. After preprocessing, power spectral density (PSD) of EEG data was estimated at different frequencies (4, 5, …, 40 Hz) using the Burg method, for each epoch corresponding to one shoe presentation. Each subject's data consisted of normalized PSD values (NPVs) from all LIKE and DISLIKE cases/epochs coming from all 19 EEG channels. In order to determine the most discriminative frequencies and channels, we have utilized logistic regression, where LIKE/DISLIKE status was used as a categorical (binary) response variable and corresponding NPVs were the continuously valued input variables or predictors. We observed that when all the NPVs (total of 37) are used as predictors, the regression problem was becoming ill-posed due to large number of predictors (compared to the number of samples) and high correlation among predictors. To circumvent this issue, we have divided the frequency band into low frequency (LF) 4-19 Hz and high frequency (HF) 20-40 Hz bands and analyzed the influence of the NPV in these bands separately. Then, using the p-values that indicate how significantly estimated predictor weights are different than zero, we have determined the NPVs and channels that are more influential in determining the outcome, i.e., like/dislike decision. In the LF band, 4 and 5 Hz were found to be the most discriminative frequencies (MDFs). In the HF band, none of the frequencies seemed offer significant information. When both male and female data was used, in the LF band, a frontal channel on the left (F7-A1) and a temporal channel on the right (T6-A2) were found to be the most discriminative channels (MDCs). In the HF band, MDCs were central (Cz-A1) and occipital on the left (O1-A1) channels. The results of like timings suggest that male and female behavior for this set of stimulant images were similar.

[1]  D. Perrett,et al.  Dissociable neural responses to facial expressions of sadness and anger. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  D. Ariely,et al.  Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  H. Jasper Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .

[4]  M Esslen,et al.  Brain areas and time course of emotional processing , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  A. Agresti An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[8]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .

[9]  Chrysa D. Lithari,et al.  Are Females More Responsive to Emotional Stimuli? A Neurophysiological Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions , 2009, Brain Topography.

[10]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Affective Learning Enhances Visual Detection and Responses in Primary Visual Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications , 1992 .

[12]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1972, Predictive Analytics.

[13]  R. Davidson,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  S. S. Wilks The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses , 1938 .

[15]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  On the Use of EEG or MEG Brain Imaging Tools in Neuromarketing Research , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[16]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital signal processing (3rd ed.): principles, algorithms, and applications , 1996 .

[17]  A. Damasio,et al.  The nature of feelings: evolutionary and neurobiological origins , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  F. Cincotti,et al.  Changes in Brain Activity During the Observation of TV Commercials by Using EEG, GSR and HR Measurements , 2010, Brain Topography.

[19]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Spectral EEG frontal asymmetries correlate with the experienced pleasantness of TV commercial advertisements , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[20]  A. Damasio,et al.  Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  P. Lang International Affective Picture System (IAPS) : Technical Manual and Affective Ratings , 1995 .

[22]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  J. Rice Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 1988 .

[24]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  The Neural Substrates of Reward Processing in Humans: The Modern Role of fMRI , 2004, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[25]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts: comparison between ICA and PCA , 1998, Neural Networks for Signal Processing VIII. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop (Cat. No.98TH8378).

[26]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Introduction to spectral analysis , 1997 .

[27]  H. E. Krugman,et al.  Brain wave measures of media involvement. , 1971 .

[28]  M. Bradley,et al.  Brain potentials in perception: picture complexity and emotional arousal. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[29]  E. Basar,et al.  Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[30]  Fernando Lopes da Silva,et al.  Comprar Niedermeyer's Electroencephalography, 6/e (Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields ) | Fernando Lopes Da Silva | 9780781789424 | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins , 2010 .

[31]  R. Davidson What does the prefrontal cortex “do” in affect: perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[32]  G. Zaltman How Customers Think: Essential Insights into the Mind of the Market , 2003 .