Memory for the process of constructing an integrated mental model

We report two experiments in which people read descriptions of integrated spatial configurations, together with comparable descriptions that did not describe integrated spatial configurations. The integrated spatial descriptions, but not the comparable descriptions, thus supported the construction of a coherent mental model. In Experiment 1, each sentence of the comparable descriptions described the spatial relation between two objects that were not mentioned elsewhere in the description. In Experiment 2, the comparable descriptions were nonspatial, having been constructed by replacing the spatial relations with nonspatial relations. In both experiments, participants were given a surprise recognition test in which they had to identify each of the original descriptions—of both integrated spatial configurations and nonspatial configurations—among a set of distractors. When the sentences in the original description were reordered (and participants were instructed to ignore sentence order), recognition memory was reliably depressed, but only for the integrated spatial descriptions. Reordering descriptions does not change their propositional content, nor does it change the described situation; however, it does change the process of constructing a mental model of that situation. These findings thus suggest that memory for the descriptions retains a trace of the process of constructing an integrated mental model and that reordering the sentences disrupts this memory because the reordering reduces the similarity of the processing of the descriptions at recognition.

[1]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Spatial Descriptions and Referential Continuity , 1982 .

[2]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[3]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Recognition memory for sentences from spatial descriptions: A test of the episodic construction trace hypothesis , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[4]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[5]  C. Fletcher.  Assessing recognition memory for surface forms in discourse : a methodological note , 1992 .

[6]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[7]  Charles R. Fletcher,et al.  Levels of representation in memory for discourse. , 1994 .

[8]  G. Radvansky,et al.  Mental models and the fan effect. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The mental representation of spatial descriptions , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Lisa Geraci,et al.  Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework , 2002, Memory.

[11]  Thom Baguley,et al.  The representation of spatial mental models in long-term memory , 1994 .

[12]  M. Lansdale.  When nothing is “off the record”: Exploring the theoretical implications of the continuous recording of cognitive process in memory , 2005, Memory.

[13]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[14]  John R. Anderson.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[15]  G. Bower,et al.  Mental models in narrative comprehension. , 1990, Science.

[16]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[17]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[18]  Rolf A. Zwaan.  Processing Narrative Time Shifts , 1996 .

[19]  T. Baguley,et al.  Long-Term Memory for Spatial and Temporal Mental Models Includes Construction Processes and Model Structure , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension , 1987 .

[21]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Memory for mental models of spatial descriptions: An episodic-construction-trace hypothesis , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[22]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[23]  J Favrel,et al.  On the relation between representations constructed from text comprehension and transitive inference production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.