Interface Methods Renegotiating relations between digital social research , STS and the sociology of innovation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Downs. Up and Down with Ecology--The Issue Attention Cycle , 1972 .
[2] M. Callon,et al. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis , 1983 .
[3] M. Callon,et al. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology : sociology of science in the real world , 1988 .
[4] Neal S. Coulter,et al. Software Engineering as Seen through Its Research Literature: A Study in Co-Word Analysis , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[5] Edgar A. Whitley,et al. The Golem: What you Should Know about Science , 1999 .
[6] Noortje Marres,et al. Depluralising the Web and Repluralising Public Debate: The Case of the GM Food Debate on the Web , 2000 .
[7] N. Marres,et al. Landscaping climate change: a mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web , 2000 .
[8] Celia Lury,et al. Brands: The Logos of the Global Economy , 2004 .
[9] N. Marres,et al. Recipe for tracing the fate of issues and their publics on the Web , 2005 .
[10] Mike Thelwall,et al. Web issue analysis: An integrated water resource management case study , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[11] Andrea Scharnhorst,et al. Webindicators: a new generation of S&T indicators , 2006 .
[12] Roger Burrows,et al. Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations , 2007 .
[13] N. Marres,et al. Subsuming the ground: how local realities of the Fergana Valley, the Narmada Dams and the BTC pipeline are put to use on the Web , 2008 .
[14] David Weimer. Bibliography , 2018, Medical History. Supplement.
[15] Francis Chateauraynaud. Public controversies and the Pragmatics of Protest , 2009 .
[16] Richard A. Rogers. The end of the virtual: Digital methods , 2009 .
[17] Mike Savage,et al. Contemporary Sociology and the Challenge of Descriptive Assemblage , 2009 .
[18] L. Suchman. Agencies in Technology Design: Feminist Reconfigurations* , 2020, Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics.
[19] T. Venturini. Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory , 2010 .
[20] Maiko Spiess. Sorting Things Out - Classification and Its Consequences , 2010 .
[21] José van Dijck,et al. Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system , 2010, New Media Soc..
[22] Emma Uprichard,et al. Dirty Data: Longitudinal Classification Systems , 2011 .
[23] Noortje Marres,et al. The costs of public involvement: everyday devices of carbon accounting and the materialization of participation , 2011 .
[24] Cordula Kropp,et al. Infrastructures of risk: a mapping approach towards controversies on risks , 2011 .
[25] M. Savage,et al. The Double Social Life of Methods , 2011 .
[26] Lars Kai Hansen,et al. Good Friends, Bad News - Affect and Virality in Twitter , 2011, ArXiv.
[27] Celia Lury,et al. Inventive methods : the happening of the social , 2012 .
[28] K. Crawford,et al. Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon , 2012 .
[29] N. Marres. The Redistribution of Methods: On Intervention in Digital Social Research, Broadly Conceived , 2012 .
[30] B. Latour,et al. 'The whole is always smaller than its parts': a digital test of Gabriel Tardes' monads. , 2012, The British journal of sociology.
[31] Taina Bucher,et al. Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook , 2012, New Media Soc..
[32] Stefan Stieglitz,et al. Quantitative Approaches to Comparing Communication Patterns on Twitter , 2012 .
[33] Les Back,et al. A Manifesto for Live Methods: Provocations and Capacities , 2012 .
[34] Marina Jirotka,et al. Supporting Scientific Collaboration: Methods, Tools and Concepts , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
[35] Celia Lury. Going Live: Towards an Amphibious Sociology , 2012 .
[36] Tommaso Venturini,et al. Building on faults: How to represent controversies with digital methods , 2012, Public understanding of science.
[37] Using Social Media Data Aggregators to Do Social Research , 2012 .
[38] B. E. Rnard. Climate Change Sceptics , 2013 .
[39] Greg Elmer,et al. THE RESEARCH POLITICS OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS , 2013 .
[40] Astrid Mager,et al. Technoscientific promotion and biofuel policy: How the press and search engines stage the biofuel controversy , 2013 .
[41] M. Savage,et al. Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices , 2013 .
[42] Anne Helmond,et al. The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web , 2013, New Media Soc..
[43] Anne Beaulieu,et al. Virtual Knowledge. Experimenting in the Humanities and the Social Sciences. , 2013 .
[44] Bernhard Rieder,et al. UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Mining one percent of Twitter : collections , baselines , sampling , 2013 .
[45] K. Asdal. From Climate Issue to Oil Issue: Offices of Public Administration, Versions of Economics, and the Ordinary Technologies of Politics , 2014 .
[46] David Mason,et al. Digital Methods , 2014, Online Inf. Rev..
[47] James Mussell. Raw Data is an Oxymoron , 2014 .
[48] N. Marres. Why Map Issues? On Controversy Analysis as a Digital Method , 2015, Science, technology & human values.
[49] M. Michael,et al. Speculative Method and Twitter: Bots, Energy and Three Conceptual Characters , 2015 .
[50] Julie Bouchard,et al. Scraping the Social? Issues in real-time social research , 2015 .
[51] Kate Crawford,et al. What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint , 2016, New Media Soc..