W phase source inversion for moderate to large earthquakes (1990–2010)

Rapid characterization of the earthquake source and of its effects is a growing field of interest. Until recently, it still took several hours to determine the first-order attributes of a great earthquake (e.g. M_w ≥ 7.5), even in a well-instrumented region. The main limiting factors were data saturation, the interference of different phases and the time duration and spatial extent of the source rupture. To accelerate centroid moment tensor (CMT) determinations, we have developed a source inversion algorithm based on modelling of the W phase, a very long period phase (100–1000 s) arriving at the same time as the P wave. The purpose of this work is to finely tune and validate the algorithm for large-to-moderate-sized earthquakes using three components of W phase ground motion at teleseismic distances. To that end, the point source parameters of all M_w ≥ 6.5 earthquakes that occurred between 1990 and 2010 (815 events) are determined using Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks, Global Seismographic Network broad-band stations and STS1 global virtual networks of the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Data Management Center. For each event, a preliminary magnitude obtained from W phase amplitudes is used to estimate the initial moment rate function half duration and to define the corner frequencies of the passband filter that will be applied to the waveforms. Starting from these initial parameters, the seismic moment tensor is calculated using a preliminary location as a first approximation of the centroid. A full CMT inversion is then conducted for centroid timing and location determination. Comparisons with Harvard and Global CMT solutions highlight the robustness of W phase CMT solutions at teleseismic distances. The differences in M_w rarely exceed 0.2 and the source mechanisms are very similar to one another. Difficulties arise when a target earthquake is shortly (e.g. within 10 hr) preceded by another large earthquake, which disturbs the waveforms of the target event. To deal with such difficult situations, we remove the perturbation caused by earlier disturbing events by subtracting the corresponding synthetics from the data. The CMT parameters for the disturbed event can then be retrieved using the residual seismograms. We also explore the feasibility of obtaining source parameters of smaller earthquakes in the range 6.0 ≤_Mw < 6.5. Results suggest that the W phase inversion can be implemented reliably for the majority of earthquakes of Mw= 6 or larger.

[1]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Real-time W phase inversion during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake , 2011 .

[2]  David J. Wald,et al.  88 Hours: The U.S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Information Center Response to the 11 March 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku Earthquake , 2011 .

[3]  H. Kanamori,et al.  The 2009 Samoa–Tonga great earthquake triggered doublet , 2010, Nature.

[4]  Göran Ekström,et al.  Effects of three-dimensional Earth structure on CMT earthquake parameters , 2010 .

[5]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Source Inversion of the W-Phase: Real-time Implementation and Extension to Low Magnitudes , 2009 .

[6]  Taku Urabe,et al.  GRiD MT (grid-based real-time determination of moment tensors) monitoring the long-period seismic wavefield , 2009 .

[7]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Source inversion of W phase: speeding up seismic tsunami warning , 2008 .

[8]  Jim Mori,et al.  Triggering of earthquakes during the 2000 Papua New Guinea earthquake sequence , 2007 .

[9]  Tom Parsons,et al.  Triggering of tsunamigenic aftershocks from large strike‐slip earthquakes: Analysis of the November 2000 New Ireland earthquake sequence , 2005 .

[10]  H. Kanamori,et al.  The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 26 December 2004 , 2005, Science.

[11]  Jeroen Tromp,et al.  Earth's Free Oscillations Excited by the 26 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2005, Science.

[12]  Chen Ji,et al.  Rupture Process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2005, Science.

[13]  Göran Ekström,et al.  Global seismicity of 2003: centroid–moment-tensor solutions for 1087 earthquakes , 2005 .

[14]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  The diversity of the physics of earthquakes , 2004, Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and Biological Sciences.

[15]  J. Tromp,et al.  Theoretical Global Seismology , 1998 .

[16]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  3-D rotation of double-couple earthquake sources , 1991 .

[17]  K. Abe Quantification of tsunamigenic earthquakes by the Mt scale , 1989 .

[18]  E. Okal Seismic parameters controlling far-field tsunami amplitudes: A review , 1988 .

[19]  T. Jordan,et al.  Optimal estimation of scalar seismic moment , 1982 .

[20]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Use of long-period surface waves for rapid determination of earthquake-source parameters , 1981 .

[21]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[22]  John H. Woodhouse,et al.  Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity , 1981 .

[23]  H. Kanamori,et al.  A moment magnitude scale , 1979 .

[24]  K. Abe Size of great earthquakes of 1837–1974 inferred from tsunami data , 1979 .

[25]  H. Kanamori The energy release in great earthquakes , 1977 .

[26]  J. Mendiguren INVERSION OF SURFACE WAVE DATA IN SOURCE MECHANISM STUDIES , 1977 .

[27]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Theoretical Basis of Some Empirical Relations in Seismology by Hiroo Kanamori And , 1975 .

[28]  Y. Y.,et al.  3-D rotation of double-couple earthquake sources , 2006 .

[29]  J. Tromp,et al.  The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2005 .

[30]  Michael Antolik,et al.  The June 2000 Mw 7.9 earthquakes south of Sumatra: Deformation in the India–Australia Plate , 2003 .

[31]  H. Kanamori Mechanism of tsunami earthquakes , 1972 .

[32]  C. Richter An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale , 1935 .