Perceiving nested affordances for another person’s actions

Affordances are available behaviors that emerge out of relations between properties of animals and properties of their environment. Affordances are nested within one another. One way to conceptualize this nesting is through a mean-ends hierarchy. Previous research has shown that perceivers are sensitive to hierarchical means-ends relationships when perceiving affordances for their own actions. Affordances are also nested in a social context. We investigated perception of hierarchical mean-ends nesting of affordances for another person’s actions. We asked participants to judge the maximum reaching height of another person (the "actor"). Judgments of the actor’s maximum reaching height reflected manipulated constraints on the reaching task, suggesting that participants were sensitive (prospectively) to hierarchical relations between lower order affordances and higher order affordances. In addition, the results revealed that judgments scaled to the reaching ability of the actor and not that of the perceiver. We argue that perceivers were sensitive to hierarchical means-ends nesting of affordances for another person across two-levels of this hierarchy, and that perceivers’ judgments were based upon perceptual information about the actor’s action capabilities, rather than being based upon simulation of perceivers’ own abilities.

[1]  Jeffrey B Wagman,et al.  Hierarchical nesting of affordances in a tool use task. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Thomas A. Stoffregen,et al.  Sensitivity to hierarchical relations among affordances in the assembly of asymmetric tools , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Brian R. Baucom,et al.  The influence of social context and body size on action judgments for self and others. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Wagman,et al.  Task specificity and anatomical independence in perception of properties by means of a wielded object. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Michael A Riley,et al.  Remembered affordances reflect the fundamentally action-relevant, context-specific nature of visual perception. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  K. Shockley,et al.  Essential kinematic information, athletic experience, and affordance perception for others , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Action semantics: A unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge. , 2014, Physics of life reviews.

[8]  Takahiro Higuchi,et al.  Can perception of aperture passability be improved immediately after practice in actual passage? Dissociation between walking and wheelchair use , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Ecological Perspective on Perception-Action: What Kind of Science Does It Entail? , 2013 .

[10]  John Bridgeman,et al.  Bodies and other visual objects: the dialectics of reaching toward objects , 2013, Psychological research.

[11]  L. Wheaton,et al.  One hand, two objects: Emergence of affordance in contexts , 2012, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  John M. Franchak,et al.  Perception of passage through openings depends on the size of the body in motion , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Perception of maximum reaching height reflects impending changes in reaching ability and improvements transfer to unpracticed reaching tasks , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  D. Dotov,et al.  Understanding affordances : history and contemporary development of Gibson's central concept = Zrozumieć afordancje : przegląd badań nad główną tezą Jamesa J. Gibsona / Dobromir G. Dotov, Lin Nie, Matthieu M. de Wit ; przekł. D. Lubiszewski, Nelly Strelhau. , 2012 .

[16]  V. Gallese,et al.  What is so special about embodied simulation? , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Takahiro Higuchi,et al.  Athletic experience influences shoulder rotations when running through apertures. , 2011, Human movement science.

[18]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Influence of Athletic Experience and Kinematic Information on Skill-relevant Affordance Perception , 2022 .

[19]  Tehran J. Davis,et al.  Perceiving Affordances for Joint Actions , 2010, Perception.

[20]  J. Wagman,et al.  Nested prospectivity in perception: Perceived maximum reaching height reflects anticipated changes in reaching ability , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The paired-object affordance effect. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  Duck! Scaling the height of a horizontal barrier to body height , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[23]  M. Turvey,et al.  Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. , 2009 .

[24]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Tuning in to another person's action capabilities: perceiving maximal jumping-reach height from walking kinematics. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Verónica C. Ramenzoni,et al.  An information-based approach to action understanding , 2008, Cognition.

[26]  M. Turvey Action and perception at the level of synergies. , 2007, Human movement science.

[27]  Leonard S. Mark,et al.  Perceiving the Actions of Other People , 2007 .

[28]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Contrasting Approaches to Perceiving and Acting With Others , 2006 .

[29]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  T. Stoffregen Affordances as Properties of the Animal-Environment System , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[31]  Thomas A. Stoffregen,et al.  Affordances Are Enough: Reply to Chemero et al. (2003) , 2003 .

[32]  L. S. Mark,et al.  How Do Task Characteristics Affect the Transitions Between Seated and Standing Reaches? , 2001 .

[33]  Jeffrey B. Wagman,et al.  Affordances and Inertial Constraints on Tool Use , 2001 .

[34]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  Perceiving affordances for another person's actions. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  L S Mark,et al.  Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Eleanor J. Gibson,et al.  Has Psychology a Future? , 1994 .

[37]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  The Ecology of Human-Machine Systems II: Mediating 'Direct Perception' in Complex Work Domains , 1990 .

[38]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visually perceiving what is reachable. , 1989 .

[39]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .