VELOCITY-DEPENDENT CATASTROPHIC DISRUPTION CRITERIA FOR PLANETESIMALS

The resistance of planetesimals to collisional erosion changes dramatically during planet formation. The transition between accretion and erosion from a collision is defined by the relationship between the mass of the largest remnant (M lr) and the normalized specific impact energy (Q/Q* D ), where Q* D are the size-dependent catastrophic disruption criteria (the Q required to disperse half the target mass). Here, we calculate Q* D for gravitationally bound aggregates subject to low-velocity collisions (1-300 m s–1) and compare the results to previous work at high velocities. We find that Q* D varies by orders of magnitude depending on the impact velocity and material properties. We define new variables to describe catastrophic disruption that remove ambiguities (over material density and projectile-to-target mass ratio) that are inherent in the traditional variables (Q and target radius): R C1 is the spherical radius of the combined projectile and target masses (M tot) at a density of 1 g cm–3, QR is 0.5μV 2 i/M tot (μ is the reduced mass and V i is the impact velocity), and Q* RD is the QR required to disperse half the combined mass. We derive a universal law for the largest remnant, M lr/M tot = –0.5(QR /Q* RD – 1) + 0.5, and velocity-dependent catastrophic disruption criteria for strong and weak planetesimals for use in numerical studies of planet formation. Weak aggregate bodies are easily disrupted due to efficient momentum coupling during low-velocity collisions. Collisional growth of planetesimals requires a dynamically cold environment; alternatively, a noncollisional mechanism is required to form planetesimals large enough to be resistant to collisional disruption (several tens of kilometers).

[1]  P. Tanga,et al.  Collisions and Gravitational Reaccumulation: Forming Asteroid Families and Satellites , 2001, Science.

[2]  M. Arakawa.  Collisional Disruption of Ice by High-Velocity Impact , 1999 .

[3]  Erik Asphaug,et al.  Low-speed impacts between rubble piles modeled as collections of polyhedra, 2 , 2006 .

[4]  Erik Asphaug,et al.  Structure of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 Inferred from the Physics of Tidal Breakup , 1996 .

[5]  S. Weidenschilling,et al.  The Origin of Comets in the Solar Nebula: A Unified Model , 1997 .

[6]  Masahiko Arakawa,et al.  Impact experiments on porous icy-silicate cylindrical blocks and the implication for disruption and accumulation of small icy bodies , 2002 .

[7]  Clark R. Chapman,et al.  Secondary craters on Europa and implications for cratered surfaces , 2005, Nature.

[9]  Manabu Kato,et al.  Ejection Velocity of Ice Impact Fragments , 1995 .

[10]  W. Benz,et al.  Numerical simulations of impacts involving porous bodies: I. Implementing sub-resolution porosity in a 3D SPH hydrocode , 2008, 0807.1264.

[11]  Scott J. Kenyon,et al.  Accretion in the Early Kuiper Belt II. Fragmentation , 1999 .

[12]  Z. Leinhardt,et al.  N-body simulations of planetesimal evolution: Effect of varying impactor mass ratio , 2001 .

[13]  Y. Takagi,et al.  Impact fragmentation experiments of basalts and pyrophyllites , 1984 .

[14]  Karen J. Meech,et al.  Comet nucleus size distributions from HST and Keck telescopes , 2004 .

[15]  Brian Carcich,et al.  A ballistics analysis of the Deep Impact ejecta plume: Determining Comet Tempel 1's gravity, mass, and density , 2007 .

[16]  Manabu Kato,et al.  Ice-on-Ice Impact Experiments , 1995 .

[17]  W. Benz,et al.  Catastrophic Disruptions Revisited , 1999 .

[18]  J. J. Wu,et al.  Coefficient of restitution and rotational motions of rockfall impacts , 2002 .

[19]  D. Davis,et al.  A Laboratory Impact Study of Simulated Edgeworth–Kuiper Belt Objects , 1999 .

[20]  Dale P. Cruikshank,et al.  The solar system beyond Neptune , 2008 .

[21]  J. Kawaguchi,et al.  The Rubble-Pile Asteroid Itokawa as Observed by Hayabusa , 2006, Science.

[22]  Kevin R. Housen,et al.  Scale Effects in Strength-Dominated Collisions of Rocky Asteroids , 1999 .

[23]  G. Wetherill,et al.  Formation of planetary embryos: effects of fragmentation, low relative velocity, and independent variation of eccentricity and inclination. , 1993, Icarus.

[24]  A. Nakamura,et al.  Collisional disruption of porous sintered glass beads at low impact velocities , 2007 .

[25]  Jeffrey S. Oishi,et al.  Rapid planetesimal formation in turbulent circumstellar disks , 2007, Nature.

[26]  P. Goldreich,et al.  The formation of planetesimals. , 1973 .

[27]  Fred L. Whipple,et al.  A comet model. I. The acceleration of Comet Encke , 1950 .

[28]  Thomas J. Ahrens,et al.  Impact experiments in low-temperature ice , 1981 .

[29]  George Lake,et al.  Direct Large-Scale N-Body Simulations of Planetesimal Dynamics , 2000 .

[30]  Y. Takagi,et al.  Impact experiments on ice , 1983 .

[31]  J. Mayo Greenberg,et al.  Do Cometesimal Collisions Lead to Bound Rubble Piles or to Aggregates Held Together by Gravity , 2000 .

[32]  H. Melosh,et al.  ASTEROIDS : SHATTERED BUT NOT DISPERSED , 1997 .

[33]  K. Holsapple,et al.  On the fragmentation of asteroids and planetary satellites , 1990 .

[34]  Keith A. Holsapple,et al.  Catastrophic disruptions and cratering of solar system bodies: a review and new results , 1994 .

[35]  W. Benz.  Low Velocity Collisions and the Growth of Planetesimals , 2000 .

[36]  D. Davis,et al.  On the collisional disruption of porous icy targets simulating Kuiper belt objects , 2004 .

[37]  A. Nakamura,et al.  Collisional disruption of weakly sintered porous targets at low-impact velocities , 2007 .

[38]  D. Brownlee,et al.  Target Porosity Effects in Impact Cratering and Collisional Disruption , 1993 .

[39]  Karim Shariff,et al.  Toward Planetesimals: Dense Chondrule Clumps in the Protoplanetary Nebula , 2008, 0804.3526.

[40]  Donald E. Gault,et al.  The destruction of tektites by micrometeoroid impact , 1969 .

[41]  S. Love,et al.  Catastrophic Impacts on Gravity Dominated Asteroids , 1996 .