The time-pressure reducing potential of telehomeworking: the Dutch case

Nowadays, people in all walks of life are increasingly pressed for time. This may be engendered by the intensification of paid work, the increase in female labour-market participation resulting in a growing number of workers having substantive family obligations, and people’s higher expectations of personal development and leisureconsumption (see Robinson and Godbey, 1997; Schor, 1992). In the present study we are concerned with how time and time use are experienced and how specific work and household conditions influence feelings of time pressure. We particularly focus on one work condition and its supposed capacity to reduce time pressure, i.e. telehomeworking. Telehomeworking refers to working at or from home during (at least part of) the employees’ contractual working hours, often, but not necessarily, mediated by IT (Felstead et al., 2000). Among the drivers for telehomeworking is its widely perceived potential to help workers cope with the mutual incompatability of paid work and the rest of life, and to reduce related time pressures, which may improve both the functioning of organizations, individual workers and their households. In previous telehomeworking studies, time pressure is often covered under the general heading ‘quality of life’ (France et al., 2002; Vitterso et al., 2003). Like many other work–family arrangements, however, telehomeworking can be double-edged (Mirchandani, 2000). The relationship between telehomeworking and time pressure has been occassionally looked into (Hill et al., 1996) but rarely explicitly, let alone for various telehomeworking categories. The present study, therefore, questions whether telehomeworking can be regarded as a time-pressure reducing strategy, and whether this differs across gender and ‘occassional’, ‘light’ and ‘heavy’ telehomeworkers. Its main objective is to analyse the time-pressure reducing potential of the telehomeworking practice by showing how male and female telehomeworking categories differ with respect to their perceived levels of time pressure from their on-site working equivalents, and how the relationship between employees’ telehomeworking behaviour and time pressure is mediated by factors that relate to work–life balance (WLB). The study uses data from a large-scale Dutch research programme entitled Time Competition: Disturbed Balances and New Options in

[1]  S. Bergum,et al.  Sustainability in the new economy : Designing a New Work Space, Sustainability and ethical dimensions , 2002 .

[2]  E. Hill,et al.  Influences of The Virtual Office on Aspects of Work and Work/Life Balance , 1998 .

[3]  Pascale Peters,et al.  Access to Home-Based Telework: A Multi-Level and Multi-Actor Perspective , 2007 .

[4]  Jeffrey H. Greenhaus,et al.  Sources of Conflict Between Work and Family Roles , 1985 .

[5]  Kiran Mirchandani,et al.  “The Best of Both Worlds” and “Cutting My Own Throat”: Contradictory Images of Home-Based Work , 2000 .

[6]  D. Fouarge,et al.  Trendrapport Aanbod van arbeid 2001. , 2002 .

[7]  C. Higgins,et al.  Telework and the balance between work and family: is telework part of the problem or part of the solution? , 1998 .

[8]  Birgitte Yttri,et al.  Impacts of Home-Based Telework on Quality of Life for Employees and Their Partners. Quantitative and Qualitative Results From a European Survey , 2003 .

[9]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign , 1979 .

[10]  Toon W. Taris,et al.  A multigroup analysis of the job demands-resources model in four home care organizations , 2003 .

[11]  Suzan Lewis,et al.  Home-based Telework, Gender, and the Synchronization of Work and Family: Perspectives of Teleworkers and their Co-residents , 2001 .

[12]  Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay,et al.  Balancing work and family with telework? Organizational issues and challenges for women and managers , 2002 .

[13]  Sabine A. E. Geurts,et al.  Toward a Dual-Process Model of Work-Home Interference , 2004 .

[14]  M. Collins The (Not so Simple) Case for Teleworking: A Study at Lloyd's of London , 2005 .

[15]  Kea G. Tijdens,et al.  Employees' opportunities, preferences, and practices in telecommuting adoption , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[16]  N. Jewson,et al.  A statistical portrait of working at home in the UK: evidence from the Labour Force Survey , 2000 .

[17]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  After-Hours Telecommuting and Work-Family Conflict: A Comparative Analysis , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Yehuda Baruch,et al.  Home, Sweet Work: Requirements for Effective Home Working , 1997 .

[19]  Peter Johnston and John Nolan e-Work 2000. Status Report on New Ways to Work in the Information Society , 2000 .

[20]  C. Higgins,et al.  Gender differences in work-family conflict. , 1991 .

[21]  A. J. Hawkins,et al.  Work and family in the virtual office: Perceived influences of mobile telework. , 1996 .

[22]  Christena Nippert-Eng Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries through Everyday Life , 1996 .

[23]  M. Kompier,et al.  Work-home interaction from a work psychological perspective: Development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING , 2005 .

[24]  Sheila M. Jacobs,et al.  Telecommuting and quality of life: a review of the literature and a model for research , 1994 .

[25]  Juliet B. Schor,et al.  The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline Of Leisure , 1991 .

[26]  Y. Baruch Teleworking: benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers , 2000 .

[27]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time , 1998 .