Predator–prey body size, interaction strength and the stability of a real food web

Summary 1We examined the empirical relationship between predator–prey body size ratio and interaction strength in the Ythan Estuary food web. 2We have refined a previously published version of the food web and explored how size-based predatory effects might affect food web dynamics. To do so, we used four predatory species Crangon crangon (Linnaeus), Carcinus maenas (Linnaeus), Pomatoschistus microps (Kroyer) and Platichthys flesus (Linnaeus) and one common prey species Corophium volutator (Pallas) from the food web. 3All predators and prey were sorted into small, medium and large size classes and placed into mesocosms in all possible pairwise combinations of size and species identity to determine per capita effects of predators on prey (aij). 4Using Lotka–Volterra dynamics the empirical body size relationships obtained from these experiments and other relationships already available for the Ythan Estuary, we parameterized a food web model for this system. The local stability properties of the resulting food web models were then determined. 5We found that by choosing interaction strengths using an empirically defined scaling law, the resulting food web models are always dynamically stable, despite the residual uncertainties in the modelling approach. This contrasts with the statistical expectation that random webs with random parameters have a vanishingly improbable chance of stability. 6The patterning of predator and prey body sizes in real ecosystems affects the arrangement of interaction strengths, which in turn determines food web stability.

[1]  E. Sala,et al.  Community-wide distribution of predator–prey interaction strength in kelp forests , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  A. Dobson,et al.  Parasites and Food Webs , 2005 .

[3]  E. Stellwagen,et al.  Relationship of protein thermostability to accessible surface area , 1978, Nature.

[4]  M. Huxham,et al.  Do Parasites Reduce the Chances of Triangulation in a Real Food Web , 1996 .

[5]  E. Berlow,et al.  QUANTIFYING VARIATION IN THE STRENGTHS OF SPECIES INTERACTIONS , 1999 .

[6]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Simple rules yield complex food webs , 2000, Nature.

[7]  James O. Farlow,et al.  A Consideration of the Trophic Dynamics of a Late Cretaceous Large-Dinosaur Community (Oldman Formation) , 1976 .

[8]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density , 1998, Nature.

[9]  M. Huxham,et al.  Size constraints in a real food web: predator, parasite and prey body‐size relationships , 2002 .

[10]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance, and body size , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Paine,et al.  Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength , 1992, Nature.

[12]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Community Food Webs: Data and Theory , 1990 .

[13]  D. Haydon.  MAXIMALLY STABLE MODEL ECOSYSTEMS CAN BE HIGHLY CONNECTED , 2000 .

[14]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Functional diversity governs ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment , 2000, Nature.

[15]  Anje-Margriet Neutel,et al.  Stability in Real Food Webs: Weak Links in Long Loops , 2002, Science.

[16]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Body Size and Consumer-Resource Dynamics , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[17]  Jónsson,et al.  Effects of Predator-prey Body Size Ratios on the Stability of Food Chains. , 1998, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[18]  Raffaelli,et al.  Defining the abundance body-size constraint space: data from a real food web , 1999 .

[19]  J. Lawton,et al.  On feeding on more than one trophic level , 1978, Nature.

[20]  R. Peters.  The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[21]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Re–evaluating the omnivory–stability relationship in food webs , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Simon Jennings,et al.  Use of size-based production and stable isotope analyses to predict trophic transfer efficiencies and predator-prey body mass ratios in food webs , 2002 .

[23]  A. Neutel,et al.  Energetics, Patterns of Interaction Strengths, and Stability in Real Ecosystems , 1995, Science.

[24]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities , 2004 .

[25]  Andrew D. Huberman,et al.  Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation , 2000, Nature.

[26]  Mark Huxham,et al.  Parasites and food web patterns , 1995 .

[27]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Food webs and niche space. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[28]  Joan Saldaña,et al.  Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs , 1993 .

[29]  J. Wootton,et al.  ESTIMATES AND TESTS OF PER CAPITA INTERACTION STRENGTH: DIET, ABUNDANCE, AND IMPACT OF INTERTIDALLY FORAGING BIRDS , 1997 .

[30]  D. Raffaelli,et al.  Compartments and predation in an estuarine food web , 1992 .

[31]  Stephan B. Munch,et al.  Sustaining Fisheries Yields Over Evolutionary Time Scales , 2002, Science.

[32]  K. McCann.  The diversity–stability debate , 2000, Nature.

[33]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[34]  J. Duffy,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connection , 2002 .

[35]  R. Paine.  Trophic Control of Production in a Rocky Intertidal Community , 2002, Science.

[36]  W. Fagan,et al.  Hatch Density Variation of a Generalist Arthropod Predator: Population Consequenes and Community Impact , 1994 .

[37]  Charles M. Newman,et al.  Community Food Webs , 1990 .

[38]  W. Calder.  Size, Function, and Life History , 1988 .

[39]  S. Hall,et al.  Food-web patterns : lessons from a species-rich web , 1991 .

[40]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Invasion of a stream food web by a new top predator , 2001 .

[41]  Richard Law,et al.  PERMANENCE AND THE ASSEMBLY OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 1996 .

[42]  R. Summers.  The feeding ecology of the flounder Platichthys flesus (L.) in the Ythan Estuary, Aberdeenshire , 1975 .

[43]  J. Lawton,et al.  Number of trophic levels in ecological communities , 1977, Nature.

[44]  V. Jansen,et al.  Complexity and stability revisited , 2003 .

[45]  L. Lawlor.  A Comment on Randomly Constructed Model Ecosystems , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[46]  J. Lawton,et al.  Invertebrate predator-prey body size relationships: an explanation for upper triangular food webs and patterns in food web structure? , 1987, Oecologia.

[47]  Stephen J. G. Hall,et al.  Assessing the Relative Importance of Trophic Links in Food Webs , 1996 .

[48]  A. Hastings,et al.  Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature , 1998, Nature.

[49]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[50]  H. Milne,et al.  Energy flow in the Ythan Estuary, Aberdeenshire, Scotland , 1981 .

[51]  P. Yodzis,et al.  The stability of real ecosystems , 1981, Nature.