Low-Reynolds Number Aerodynamics of an 8.9% Scale Semispan Swept Wing for Assessment of Icing Effects

Aerodynamic assessment of icing effects on swept wings is an important component of a larger effort to improve three-dimensional icing simulation capabilities. An understanding of ice-shape geometric fidelity and Reynolds and Mach number effects on the iced-wing aerodynamics is needed to guide the development and validation of ice-accretion simulation tools. To this end, wind-tunnel testing and computational flow simulations were carried out for an 8.9%-scale semispan wing based upon the Common Research Model airplane configuration. The wind-tunnel testing was conducted at the Wichita State University 7 ft x 10 ft Beech wind tunnel from Reynolds numbers of 0.8×106 to 2.4×106 and corresponding Mach numbers of 0.09 to 0.27. This paper presents the results of initial studies investigating the model mounting configuration, clean-wing aerodynamics and effects of artificial ice roughness. Four different model mounting configurations were considered and a circular splitter plate combined with a streamlined shroud was selected as the baseline geometry for the remainder of the experiments and computational simulations. A detailed study of the clean-wing aerodynamics and stall characteristics was made. In all cases, the flow over the outboard sections of the wing separated as the wing stalled with the inboard sections near the root maintaining attached flow. Computational flow simulations were carried out with the ONERA elsA software that solves the compressible, three-dimensional RANS equations. The computations were carried out in either fully turbulent mode or with natural transition. Better agreement between the experimental and computational results was obtained when considering computations with free transition compared to turbulent solutions. These results indicate that experimental evolution of the clean wing performance coefficients were due to the effect of three-dimensional transition location and that this must be taken into account for future data analysis. This research also confirmed that artificial ice roughness created with rapid-prototype manufacturing methods can generate aerodynamic performance effects comparable to grit roughness of equivalent size when proper care is exercised in design and installation. The conclusions of this combined experimental and computational study contributed directly to the successful implementation of follow-on test campaigns with numerous artificial ice-shape configurations for this 8.9% scale model.

[1]  J. F. Marchman,et al.  Acoustic and turbulence influences on stall hysteresis , 1986 .

[2]  Sam Lee,et al.  Effect of High-Fidelity Ice Accretion Simulations on the Performance of a Full-Scale Airfoil Model , 2008 .

[3]  Andy P. Broeren,et al.  Experiments on airfoils at low reynolds numbers , 1996 .

[4]  Melissa B. Rivers,et al.  Experimental Investigations of the NASA Common Research Model in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility and NASA Ames 11-Ft Transonic Wind Tunnel (Invited) , 2011 .

[5]  P. Spalart.  A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[6]  Harold E. Addy,et al.  A Wind Tunnel Study of icing Effects on a Natural Laminar Flow Airfoil , 2000 .

[7]  Hugh W. Coleman,et al.  Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers , 1989 .

[8]  Andy P. Broeren,et al.  A Wind Tunnel Study of Icing Effects on a Business Jet Airfoil , 2003 .

[9]  Christopher W. Lum,et al.  Computational and Experimental Ice Accretions of Large Swept Wings in the Icing Research Tunnel , 2016 .

[10]  Andy P. Broeren,et al.  Iced-airfoil aerodynamics , 2005 .

[11]  Andy P. Broeren,et al.  Implementation and Validation of 3-D Ice Accretion Measurement Methodology , 2014 .

[12]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Summary of the Fourth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop , 2010 .

[13]  Christophe Benoit,et al.  Cassiopee: A CFD pre- and post-processing tool , 2015 .

[14]  Andy P. Broeren,et al.  Ice-Accretion Test Results for Three Large-Scale Swept-Wing Models in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel , 2016 .

[15]  Melissa B. Rivers,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the NASA Common Research Model , 2014 .

[16]  T. Mueller.  The influence of laminar separation and transition on low Reynolds number airfoil hysteresis , 1984 .

[17]  D. Arnal,et al.  Transition Prediction in Transonic Flow , 1989 .

[18]  Andreas Krumbein,et al.  Transition Prediction and Impact on 3D High-Lift Wing Configuration , 2007 .

[19]  Andy P. Broeren,et al.  Aerodynamic Simulation of Ice Accretion on Airfoils , 2011 .

[20]  E. Radenac.  Validation of a 3D ice accretion tool on swept wings of the SUNSET2 program , 2016 .

[21]  Christopher W. Lum,et al.  The application of a five-hole probe wake-survey technique to the study of swept wing icing aerodynamics , 2017 .

[22]  Kasim Biber,et al.  Stall Hysteresis of an Airfoil with Slotted Flap , 2005 .

[23]  James C. Ferris,et al.  A study of high-lift airfoils at high Reynolds numbers in the Langley low-turbulence pressure tunnel , 1987 .

[24]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Development of a Common Research Model for Applied CFD Validation Studies , 2008 .

[25]  Michael B. Bragg,et al.  Experimental study of splitter plates for use with semispan wing models , 2015 .

[26]  David Hue,et al.  Validation of a near-body and off-body grid partitioning methodology for aircraft aerodynamic performance prediction , 2015 .

[27]  Philippe Villedieu,et al.  Swept-Wing Ice Accretion Characterization and Aerodynamics , 2013 .

[28]  Laurent Cambier,et al.  The Onera elsA CFD software: input from research and feedback from industry , 2013 .

[29]  S. J. Kline,et al.  Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments , 1953 .

[30]  Addy,et al.  Ice Accretions and Icing Effects for Modern Airfoils , 2000 .

[31]  Sam Lee,et al.  Validation of 3-D Ice Accretion Measurement Methodology for Experimental Aerodynamic Simulation , 2014 .

[32]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing , 1966 .