Source and magnitude of error in an inexpensive image-based water level measurement system

Summary Recent technological advances have opened the possibility to use webcams and images as part of the environmental monitoring arsenal. The potential sources and magnitude of uncertainties inherent to an image-based water level measurement system are evaluated in an experimental design in the laboratory. Sources of error investigated include image resolution, lighting effects, perspective, lens distortion and water meniscus. Image resolution and meniscus were found to weigh the most in the overall uncertainty of this system. Image distortion, although largely taken into account by the software developed, may also significantly add to uncertainty. Results suggest that “flat” images with little distortion are preferable. After correction for the water meniscus, images captured with a camera (12 mm or 16 mm focal lengths) positioned 4–7 m from the water level edge have the potential to yield water level measurements within ±3 mm when using this technique.

[1]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Experimental System for Real-Time Discharge Estimation Using an Image-Based Method , 2008 .

[2]  Masahiro Iwahashi,et al.  Water Level Detection for Functionally Layered Video Coding , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[3]  D Marr,et al.  Theory of edge detection , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  Mark Fiala,et al.  Designing Highly Reliable Fiducial Markers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Marian Muste,et al.  Large‐scale particle image velocimetry for measurements in riverine environments , 2008 .

[6]  Hernsoo Hahn,et al.  Remote Detection and Monitoring of a Water Level Using Narrow Band Channel , 2007, J. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[7]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Noncontact level sensing technique using computer vision , 2002, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[8]  Lm Ross.  The Image Processing Handbook , Sixth Edition, John C. Russ. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL, 2011, 972 pages. ISBN 1-4398-4045-0 (Hardcover) , 2011, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[9]  Anton Kruger,et al.  River gauging using PIV techniques: a proof of concept experiment on the Iowa River , 2003 .

[10]  Alexandre Hauet,et al.  Sensitivity study of large-scale particle image velocimetry measurement of river discharge using numerical simulation , 2008 .

[11]  Anton Kruger,et al.  Flow measurement in streams using video imagery , 2002 .

[12]  E. R. Cohen.  An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements , 1998 .

[13]  S. E. Rantz,et al.  Measurement and computation of streamflow , 1982 .

[14]  Steven L. Barfuss,et al.  Conditional Assessment of Flow Measurement Accuracy , 2011 .

[15]  Les Kirkup,et al.  An Introduction to Uncertainty in Measurement: Using the GUM (Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement) , 2006 .

[16]  S. E. Rantz,et al.  Measurement and computation of streamflow: Volume 1, Measurement of stage and discharge , 1982 .

[17]  John C. Russ,et al.  The Image Processing Handbook , 2016, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[18]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  On Edge Detection , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  Jae-Jun Kim,et al.  Development of an internet-based water-level monitoring and measuring system using CCD camera , 2007, ICMIT: Mechatronics and Information Technology.