Non-Parametric Decompounding of Pulse Pile-Up Under Gaussian Noise With Finite Data Sets

A novel estimator is proposed for estimating the energy distribution of photons incident upon a detector in X-ray spectroscopic systems. It is specifically designed for count-rate regimes where pulse pile-up is an issue. A key step in the derivation of the estimator is the novel reformulation of the problem as a decompounding problem of a compound Poisson process. A non-parametric decompounding algorithm is proposed for pile-up correction with finite-length data sets. Non-parametric estimation typically includes appropriately choosing a ‘kernel bandwidth’. Simulations demonstrate our data-driven bandwidth selection is close to optimal, and outperforms asymptotic-based selection in the typical regions of interest to spectroscopic applications. Non-parametric approaches are particularly useful when the shape of the detector response varies with each interaction. The method exhibits similar accuracy to other state-of-the-art non-parametric methods, while being much faster to compute.

[1]  Howard G. Tucker,et al.  EXTINGUISHING THE DISTINGUISHED LOGARITHM PROBLEMS , 1999 .

[2]  Jonathan H. Manton,et al.  Limitations of Decision Based Pile-Up Correction Algorithms , 2018, 2018 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP).

[3]  S. Hauck,et al.  FPGA-Based Pulse Pile-Up Correction With Energy and Timing Recovery , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  Eric Moulines,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of a shot-noise process , 2016, 2016 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP).

[5]  Peter Spreij,et al.  A kernel type nonparametric density estimator for decompounding , 2005, math/0505355.

[6]  Matthew S. Taubman,et al.  High-Purity Germanium Spectroscopy at Rates in Excess of $10^{6}$ Events/s , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[7]  Yaacov Ritov,et al.  Sparse Regression Algorithm for Activity Estimation in $\gamma$ Spectrometry , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Shota Gugushvili,et al.  Decompounding under Gaussian noise , 2007, 0711.0719.

[9]  Thomas Trigano,et al.  Pileup Correction Algorithm using an Iterated Sparse Reconstruction Method , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[10]  Robin P. Gardner,et al.  Prediction of the pulse-height spectral distortion caused by the peak pile-up effect , 1976 .

[11]  Eric Moulines,et al.  Statistical Pileup Correction Method for HPGe Detectors , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Eric Moulines,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of mark's distribution of an exponential Shot-noise process , 2015, 1506.08047.

[13]  Paul A. B. Scoullar,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation techniques for high rate, high throughput digital pulse processing , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[14]  Shota Gugushvili,et al.  Nonparametric inference for partially observed Levy processes , 2008 .

[15]  Christian Lageman,et al.  Decompounding on Compact Lie Groups , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  R. Novak,et al.  Efficient Reduction of Piled-Up Events in Gamma-Ray Spectrometry at High Count Rates , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[17]  N. P. Barradas,et al.  Accurate calculation of pileup effects in PIXE spectra from first principles , 2006 .

[18]  Eric Barat,et al.  Fast Digital Filtering of Spectrometric Data for Pile-up Correction , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[19]  Jun Yu Empirical Characteristic Function Estimation and Its Applications , 2003 .

[20]  Rudolf Grübel,et al.  Decompounding: an estimation problem for Poisson random sums , 2003 .

[21]  Peter Spreij,et al.  Deconvolution for an atomic distribution , 2007, 0709.3413.

[22]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[23]  G. Knoll Radiation Detection And Measurement, 3rd Ed , 2009 .