Feature-based attention affects direction-selective fMRI adaptation in hMT+.

Functional magnetic resonance adaptation has been successfully used to reveal direction-selective responses in the human motion complex (hMT+). Here, we aimed at further investigating direction-selective as well as position-selective responses of hMT+ by looking at how these responses are affected by feature-based attention. We varied motion direction and position of 2 consecutive random-dot stimuli. Participants had to either attend to the direction or the position of the stimuli in separate runs. We show that direction selectivity in hMT+ as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) adaptation was strongly influenced by task set. Attending to the motion direction of the stimuli lead to stronger direction-selective fMRI adaptation than attending to their position. Position selectivity, on the other hand, was largely unaffected by attentional focus. Interestingly, the change in the direction-selective adaptation profile across tasks could not be explained by inheritance from earlier areas. The response pattern in the early retinotopic cortex was stable across conditions. In conclusion, our results provide further evidence for the flexible coding of direction information in hMT+ depending on task demands.

[1]  D. Somers,et al.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Graded effects of spatial and featural attention on human area MT and associated motion processing areas. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Neural mechanisms of rapid natural scene categorization in human visual cortex , 2009, Nature.

[5]  E. R. Cohen,et al.  Close correlation between activity in brain area MT/V5 and the perception of a visual motion aftereffect , 1998, Current Biology.

[6]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding Seen and Attended Motion Directions from Activity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[8]  David J Heeger,et al.  Stereoscopic processing of absolute and relative disparity in human visual cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[11]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Constraints on the source of short-term motion adaptation in macaque area MT. I. the role of input and intrinsic mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[13]  D. Heeger,et al.  Retinotopy and Functional Subdivision of Human Areas MT and MST , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Attentional modulation of repetition attenuation is anatomically dissociable for scenes and faces , 2006, Brain Research.

[15]  Sang-Hun Lee,et al.  Hierarchy of direction-tuned motion adaptation in human visual cortex. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Selective Attention Modulates Neural Substrates of Repetition Priming and Implicit Visual Memory: Suppressions and Enhancements Revealed by fMRI , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  L. Cormack,et al.  Disparity- and velocity-based signals for three-dimensional motion perception in human MT+ , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  David Whitney,et al.  The Emergence of Perceived Position in the Visual System , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Daniel Kersten,et al.  Spatially specific FMRI repetition effects in human visual cortex. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  B. Wandell,et al.  Visual field maps, population receptive field sizes, and visual field coverage in the human MT+ complex. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  B. Wandell,et al.  Visual Field Maps in Human Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[23]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Parametric Analysis of fMRI Data Using Linear Systems Methods , 1997, NeuroImage.

[24]  A. Dale,et al.  The Retinotopy of Visual Spatial Attention , 1998, Neuron.

[25]  D. Heeger,et al.  Task-related modulation of visual cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[27]  Lora T. Likova,et al.  Stereomotion processing in the human occipital cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[28]  G. Orban,et al.  The Retinotopic Organization of the Human Middle Temporal Area MT/V5 and Its Cortical Neighbors , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[30]  M. Landy,et al.  Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Luca Passamonti,et al.  Changes in “Top-Down” Connectivity Underlie Repetition Suppression in the Ventral Visual Pathway , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Cerebral correlates of impaired grating perception in individual, psychophysically assessed human amblyopes , 2006, Vision Research.

[34]  Lars Muckli,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Adaptation in Visual Neuroscience , 2008, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[35]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Neuroimaging of direction-selective mechanisms for second-order motion. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociating Task Performance from fMRI Repetition Attenuation in Ventral Visual Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Daniel Yoshor,et al.  Receptive fields in human visual cortex mapped with surface electrodes. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[39]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Richard N. A. Henson,et al.  Effect of spatial attention on stimulus-specific haemodynamic repetition effects , 2007, NeuroImage.

[41]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Modulates Orientation-Selective Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[42]  A. Dale,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Nature.

[43]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[44]  W. Singer,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Objects Rotating in Depth , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  R. Henson,et al.  BOLD repetition decreases in object-responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  A. Dale,et al.  Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[47]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  J. Movshon,et al.  Neuronal Adaptation to Visual Motion in Area MT of the Macaque , 2003, Neuron.

[49]  Geoffrey M Boynton,et al.  The Representation of Behavioral Choice for Motion in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  E. Wojciulik,et al.  Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[52]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[53]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[54]  R. van Ee,et al.  Activation in Visual Cortex Correlates with the Awareness of Stereoscopic Depth , 2005 .

[55]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Sensitivity of human visual cortical areas to the stereoscopic depth of a moving stimulus. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[56]  M. Chun,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Learning-Related Repetition Attenuation Effects in Human Parahippocampal Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Constraints on the source of short-term motion adaptation in macaque area MT. II. tuning of neural circuit mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  H. Ashida,et al.  FMRI adaptation reveals separate mechanisms for first-order and second-order motion. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Maps of Visual Space in Human Occipital Cortex Are Retinotopic, Not Spatiotopic , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  Retinotopic encoding of the direction aftereffect , 2008, Vision Research.

[61]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[62]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global feature-based attention for motion and color , 2003, Vision Research.