A Comparison of Model- and Satellite-Derived Aerosol Optical Depth and Reflectivity

The determination of an accurate quantitative understanding of the role of tropospheric aerosols in the earth’s radiation budget is extremely important because forcing by anthropogenic aerosols presently represents one of the most uncertain aspects of climate models. Here the authors present a systematic comparison of three different analyses of satellite-retrieved aerosol optical depth based on the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR)-measured radiances with optical depths derived from six different models. Also compared are the model-derived clear-sky reflected shortwave radiation with satellite-measured reflectivities derived from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) satellite. The three different satellite-derived optical depths differ by between 20.10 and 0.07 optical depth units in comparison to the average of the three analyses depending on latitude and month, but the general features of the retrievals are similar. The models differ by between 20.09 and 10.16 optical depth units from the average of the models. Differences between the average of the models and the average of the satellite analyses range over 20.11 to 10.05 optical depth units. These differences are significant since the annual average clear-sky radiative forcing associated with the difference between the average of the models and the average of the satellite analyses ranges between 23.9 and 0.7 W m22 depending on latitude and is 21.7 W m22 on a global average annual basis. Variations in the source strengths of dimethylsulfide-derived aerosols and sea salt aerosols can explain differences between the models, and between the models and satellite retrievals of up to 0.2 optical depth units. The comparison of model-generated reflected shortwave radiation and ERBE-measured shortwave radiation is similar in character as a function of latitude to the analysis of modeled and satellite-retrieved optical depths, but the differences between the modeled clear-sky reflected flux and the ERBE clear-sky reflected flux is generally larger than that inferred from the difference between the models and the AVHRR optical depths, especially at high latitudes. The difference between the mean of the models and the ERBE-analyzed clear-sky flux is 1.6 W m22. The overall comparison indicates that the model-generated aerosol optical depth is systematically lower than that inferred from measurements between the latitudes of 108 and 308S. It is not likely that the shortfall is due to small values of the sea salt optical depth because increases in this component would create modeled optical depths that are larger than those from satellites in the region north of 30 8N and near 508S. Instead, the source strengths for DMS and biomass aerosols in the models may be too low. Firm conclusions, however, will require better retrieval procedures for the satellites, including better cloud screening procedures, further improvement of the model’s treatment of aerosol transport and removal, and a better determination of aerosol source strengths.

[1]  J. Penner,et al.  Global Emissions and Models of Photochemically Active Compounds , 1994 .

[2]  A. Lacis,et al.  Aerosol retrievals over the ocean by use of channels 1 and 2 AVHRR data: sensitivity analysis and preliminary results. , 1999, Applied optics.

[3]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions , 1995 .

[4]  Mian Chin,et al.  Contribution of different aerosol species to the global aerosol extinction optical thickness: Estimates from model results , 1997 .

[5]  Joyce E. Penner,et al.  An assessment of the radiative effects of anthropogenic sulfate , 1997 .

[6]  C. Land,et al.  A comparison of large-scale atmospheric sulphate aerosol models (COSAM): overview and highlights , 2001 .

[7]  Robert Atlas,et al.  A Multiyear Global Surface Wind Velocity Dataset Using SSM/I Wind Observations , 1996 .

[8]  T. Nakajima,et al.  A use of two‐channel radiances for an aerosol characterization from space , 1998 .

[9]  G. Pitari,et al.  Climatic impact of future supersonic aircraft: role of water vapour and ozone feedback on circulation , 2001 .

[10]  P. Crutzen,et al.  A three-dimensional model of the global ammonia cycle , 1994 .

[11]  Giacomo R. DiTullio,et al.  A global database of sea surface dimethylsulfide (DMS) measurements and a procedure to predict sea surface DMS as a function of latitude, longitude, and month , 1999 .

[12]  J. Penner,et al.  A global three‐dimensional model study of carbonaceous aerosols , 1996 .

[13]  T. Eck,et al.  An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET , 2001 .

[14]  Ramaswamy,et al.  Tropospheric Aerosol Climate Forcing in Clear-Sky Satellite Observations over the Oceans. , 1999, Science.

[15]  Thomas E. Graedel,et al.  Global gridded inventories of anthropogenic emissions of sulfur and nitrogen , 1996 .

[16]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Characterization of aerosols over ocean from POLDER/ADEOS‐1 , 1999 .

[17]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  A Study of Global Aerosol Optical Climatology with Two-Channel AVHRR Remote Sensing , 2000 .

[18]  G. Leeuw,et al.  Modeling coastal aerosol transport and effects of surf‐produced aerosols on processes in the marine atmospheric boundary layer , 2001 .

[19]  P. Quinn,et al.  Local closure during the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1): Aerosol mass concentration and scattering and backscattering coefficients , 1998 .

[20]  D. Tanré,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol optical thickness and size distribution over ocean from the MODIS airborne simulator during TARFOX , 1999 .

[21]  M. Chin,et al.  Tropospheric sulfur simulation and sulfate direct radiative forcing in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model , 1999 .

[22]  Sulphate particles from subsonic aviation: impact on upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric ozone , 2001 .

[23]  Robert A. West,et al.  Sensitivity of multiangle remote sensing observations to aerosol sphericity , 1997 .

[24]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[25]  J. Ogren,et al.  Aerosol light scattering properties at Cape Grim, Tasmania, during the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1) , 1998 .

[26]  C. C. Chuang,et al.  Climate forcing by carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols , 1998 .

[27]  Jean-Pierre Blanchet,et al.  Modeling sea-salt aerosols in the atmosphere 1. Model development , 1997 .

[28]  Joyce E. Penner,et al.  Towards the development of a global inventory for black carbon emissions , 1993 .

[29]  Cairns,et al.  Aerosol retrievals over the ocean using channel 1 and 2 AVHRR data: a sensitivity analysis and preliminary results , 2022 .

[30]  Bruce A. Wielicki,et al.  On the determination of cloud cover from satellite sensors: The effect of sensor spatial resolution , 1992 .

[31]  Alexander Ignatov,et al.  Development, validation, and potential enhancements to the second‐generation operational aerosol product at the National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration , 1997 .

[32]  R. Andres,et al.  A time‐averaged inventory of subaerial volcanic sulfur emissions , 1998 .

[33]  Johann Feichter,et al.  Simulation of the tropospheric sulfur cycle in a global climate model , 1996 .

[34]  P. J. Rasch,et al.  A comparison of scavenging and deposition processes in global models: results from the WCRP Cambridge Workshop of 1995 , 2000 .

[35]  B. Barkstrom,et al.  Seasonal variation of cloud radiative forcing derived from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment , 1990 .

[36]  I. Tegen,et al.  A general circulation model study on the interannual variability of soil dust aerosol , 1998 .

[37]  Ulrike Lohmann,et al.  Erratum: ``Prediction of the number of cloud droplets in the ECHAM GCM'' , 1999 .

[38]  M. Chin,et al.  Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model , 2001 .

[39]  Martyn P. Chipperfield,et al.  Evaluation and intercomparison of global atmospheric transport models using 222Rn and other short-lived tracers , 1997 .