Decentralised laboratories in the German energy transition. Why local renewable energy initiatives must reinvent themselves

This study addresses research demands for a more critical empirical assessment of the innovation capacity of the decentralised, sub-national level. In Germany, the extensive involvement and contributions of new locally-rooted renewable energy initiatives have been one of the most striking features of the country's energy transition process. This study analyses the enabling conditions, current challenges and future prospects of decentralised experimentation in the German energy system. It finds that whereas the national support scheme has for a long period protected decentralised deployment of renewable energies by locally-rooted actors in the energy field, recent reforms of the scheme now threaten their further participation in the energy market. The paper observes that decentralised initiatives not only struggle to adjust to the new framework conditions. They have also not yet sufficiently addressed the new governance challenges arising from the fact that renewable energies have reached a stage of systemic importance for the whole power system, which requires decentralised initiatives to make their own efforts compatible with overall energy system transition needs. The study concludes that in order to remain an important innovator in the German energy transition, decentralised initiatives have to prove their ability to provide solutions to the systemic challenges of the energy transition process, such as horizontal and vertical multi-level coordination and decentralised contributions to the security of supply.

[1]  Joanna Schellenberg,et al.  'Scaling-up is a craft not a science': Catalysing scale-up of health innovations in Ethiopia, India and Nigeria. , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Lars Holstenkamp,et al.  Zum Stand von Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland: Aktualisierter Überblick über Zahlen und Entwicklungen zum 31.12.2014 , 2015 .

[3]  Wolfgang Kerber,et al.  Policy Innovation, Decentralised Experimentation, and Laboratory Federalism , 2008 .

[4]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[5]  W. Oates,et al.  An Essay on Fiscal Federalism , 1999 .

[6]  Andreas Weber,et al.  Bewertung von Ausschreibungsverfahren als Finanzierungsmodell für Anlagen erneuerbarer Energienutzung , 2014 .

[7]  Helge Jörgens,et al.  The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Instruments: The Making of a New International Environmental Regime , 2004 .

[8]  Gregor Kungl,et al.  Stewards or sticklers for change? Incumbent energy providers and the politics of the German energy transition , 2015 .

[9]  E. Ostrom Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems , 2010, American Economic Review.

[10]  Sandra Wassermann,et al.  Current challenges of Germany’s energy transition project and competing strategies of challengers and incumbents: The case of direct marketing of electricity from renewable energy sources , 2015 .

[11]  F. Geels Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective , 2010 .

[12]  Kerstin Tews,et al.  Energiewende als Herausforderung der Koordination im Mehrebenensystem , 2013 .

[13]  Eva Hauser,et al.  Herausforderungen bei der Allokation von Strom aus fluktuierenden erneuerbaren Energien: Probleme und mögliche Lösungskonzepte , 2013 .

[14]  Tim Rayner,et al.  Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects , 2015 .

[15]  E. Ostrom Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[16]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective , 2008 .

[17]  Kerstin Tews,et al.  Europeanization of Energy and Climate Policy , 2015 .

[18]  Helge Jörgens,et al.  The diffusion of new environmental policy instruments , 2003 .

[19]  Michael Zürn,et al.  Commentary: On Fragmentation, Differentiation, and Coordination , 2013, Global Environmental Politics.