Nash equilibria in competitive electric energy markets

Abstract Several countries have modified the structure of their Electric Energy Markets (EEM) by the introduction of various levels of competence in the generation, transmission and distribution areas, which allows the generators to sell their production at a short-term market price (or spot price). The fundamental premise of the regulation is that the global efficiency can be improved through a strong competence in a market structure governed by explicit rules. The Game Theory is the study of mathematical models of conflict and cooperation between intelligent rational decision-makers. In this paper, the Game Theory is proposed to analyze the economic behavior of the generators to make their offers to the short-term EEM. The IEEE 9-bus system is used to illustrate the main features of the proposed method.

[1]  A. El-Keib,et al.  Calculating short-run marginal costs of active and reactive power production , 1997 .

[2]  I. Iyoda,et al.  Allocation of fixed transmission cost to wheeling transactions by cooperative game theory , 1995 .

[3]  R. McKelvey,et al.  Computation of equilibria in finite games , 1996 .

[4]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Application of games with incomplete information for pricing electricity in deregulated power pools , 1998 .

[5]  A. J. Svoboda,et al.  A new unit commitment method , 1997 .

[6]  Evaluation of alternatives for power system coordination and pooling in a competitive environment , 1997 .

[7]  Hugh Rudnick,et al.  Integration of wholesale competitive electric energy markets: an application of the Nash bargaining generalised solution , 2000 .

[8]  Alain Haurie,et al.  A two-player game model of power cogeneration in New England , 1991 .

[9]  J. Nash Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Transaction analysis in deregulated power systems using game theory , 1997 .

[11]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[12]  M. S. Bazaraa,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1979 .

[13]  H. Kuhn Classics in Game Theory , 1997 .

[14]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Transmission analysis by Nash game method , 1997 .

[15]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  Dynamic cooperative electricity exchange in a power pool , 1989, Conference Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[16]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Game theory - Analysis of Conflict , 1991 .

[17]  M. Pereira,et al.  An integrated framework for cost allocation in a multi-owned transmission system , 1995 .

[18]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .