We introduced and evaluated the techniques LightSpeed VCT uses to reduce X-ray dose and image noise in cardiac helical CT applications. These techniques include the use of much improved VCT data acquisition system (VDAS) with reduced electronic noise; cardiac bowtie that redistributes X-rays to have more signals for heart and much less flux to the peripheries; adaptive post-processing filters to reduce cardiac image noise; and ECG modulated tube currents to concentrate X-ray dose for desired cardiac phases. Phantom and patient scans were used to evaluate the dose saving and noise reduction potentials of these techniques. The results demonstrated that the improved VDAS reduced image noise 15-20% for cardiac imaging. With same scan technique, the use of cardiac bowtie reduced about 10% dose in terms of CTDIw measurement and clinical evaluation demonstrated additional 7% image noise reduction and equivalent image quality with cardiac bowtie vs. regular body bowtie. The adaptive filter generated 15-20% noise reduction while maintaining image resolution and artery sharpness. Finally, the use of ECG modulated mA method provided up to 50% dose reduction based on CTDIw measurements, but the saving potentials depended on the heart rate and cardiac phase selection. For heart rate of 60bpm and ±15% cardiac phase margin, the average dose reduction could be 30%. Since these dose and noise reduction methods are inclusive and can be combined to produce even greater dose/noise reduction. It is reasonable to believe that with VCT we maybe able to acquire cardiac helical CT images with only 30-40% of the dose of older generation 16-slice CT scanners with similar noise level and same slice thickness.
[1]
Thomas Flohr,et al.
Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation
,
2002,
European Radiology.
[2]
T. Slovis,et al.
CT and computed radiography: the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required?
,
2002,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[3]
K Taguchi,et al.
High temporal resolution for multislice helical computed tomography.
,
2000,
Medical physics.
[4]
Lee F Rogers,et al.
Dose reduction in CT: how low can we go?
,
2002,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[5]
R Haberl,et al.
A dynamic approach to identifying desired physiological phases for cardiac imaging using multislice spiral CT.
,
2003,
Medical physics.
[6]
C. Herzog,et al.
Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality
,
2002,
European Radiology.
[7]
J. Haaga,et al.
Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit.
,
2001,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[8]
M. Grasruck,et al.
Design considerations in cardiac CT
,
2006,
SPIE Medical Imaging.