Potential biogas production from artichoke byproducts in Sardinia, Italy.

The paper aims at evaluating the potential biogas production, both in terms of CH 4 and theoretical energy potential, from globe artichoke agricultural byproducts in Sardinia. Field data about the productivity of byproducts were collected on five artichoke varieties cultivated in Sardinia, to assess the biomethane production of their aboveground non-food parts (excluding the head). Moreover, secondary data from previous studies and surveys at regional scale were collected to evaluate the potential biogas production of the different districts. Fresh globe artichoke residues yielded, on average, 292.2 Nm 3 ·t DOM −1 , with dissimilarities among cultivars. Fresh samples were analyzed in two series: (a) wet basis; and (b) wet basis with catalytic enzymes application. Enzymes proved to have some beneficial effects in terms of anticipated biomethane availability. At the regional level, ab. 20 × 10 6 Nm 3 CH 4 could be produced, corresponding to the 60% of current installed capacity. However, districts potentials show some differences, depending on the specific biomass partitioning and on the productivity of cultivated varieties. Regional assessments should encompass the sensitiveness of results to agro-economic variables and the economic impacts of globe artichoke residue use in the current regional biogas sector.

[1]  G. Feijoo,et al.  Environmental assessment of farm-scaled anaerobic co-digestion for bioenergy production. , 2015, Waste management.

[2]  Richard J. Murphy,et al.  Global developments in the competition for land from biofuels , 2011 .

[3]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of maize focusing on variety, harvest time and pretreatment , 2010 .

[4]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of biogas production by monofermentation of energy crops and injection into the natural gas grid. , 2010 .

[5]  A. Prochnow,et al.  Application of hydrolytic enzymes for improving biogas feedstock fluidity , 2010 .

[6]  G. d'Imporzano,et al.  Substituting energy crops with organic wastes and agro-industrial residues for biogas production. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Fabrizio Adani,et al.  Biogas from dedicated energy crops in Northern Italy: electric energy generation costs , 2015 .

[8]  M. Nelles,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  Silvia Serranti,et al.  Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of artichoke waste: The inoculum effect , 2014, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[10]  Matteo Vittuari,et al.  A comparison of bioenergy policies and institutional frameworks in the rural areas of Emilia Romagna and Norway. , 2014 .

[11]  P. Ciaian,et al.  Food, Energy and Environment: Is Bioenergy the Missing Link? , 2011 .

[12]  Maria R. Kosseva,et al.  Management and Processing of Food Wastes , 2011 .

[13]  E. Mahmoud,et al.  How the nitrogen fertilization dose affects the biochemical composition and net mineralization of the artichoke residues , 2012 .

[14]  M. Taherzadeh,et al.  Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Wastes to Improve Ethanol and Biogas Production: A Review , 2008, International journal of molecular sciences.

[15]  G. Mauromicale,et al.  Cynara cardunculus L. genotypes as a crop for energy purposes in a Mediterranean environment , 2010 .

[16]  G. Carrosio,et al.  Energy production from biogas in the Italian countryside: Modernization vs. repeasantization , 2014 .

[17]  D. Komilis,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of tomato processing waste: Effect of alkaline pretreatment. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Debbie Holmes,et al.  Research Methods for the Biosciences , 2006 .

[19]  Wolf-Rüdiger Müller,et al.  Standardized methods for anaerobic biodegradability testing , 2004 .

[20]  Giovanni Molari,et al.  Energy characterisation of herbaceous biomasses irrigated with marginal waters. , 2014 .

[21]  Luigi Ledda,et al.  Biomass supply for energetic purposes from some Cardueae species grown in Mediterranean farming systems , 2013 .

[22]  Mark Harvey,et al.  The new competition for land: Food, energy, and climate change , 2011 .

[23]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[24]  I. Franke-Whittle,et al.  Archaeal community dynamics and abiotic characteristics in a mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion process treating fruit and vegetable processing waste sludge with chopped fresh artichoke waste. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[25]  Giovanni Mauromicale,et al.  Possible alternative utilization of Cynara spp. , 1999 .

[26]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems , 2007 .

[27]  G. Nardin,et al.  Effects of changes in Italian bioenergy promotion schemes for agricultural biogas projects: insights from a regional optimization model. , 2014 .

[28]  Giovanni Molari,et al.  Impact evaluation of integrated food-bioenergy systems: A comparative LCA of peach nectar , 2015 .

[29]  B. Zhu,et al.  Expression and characterization of a novel metagenome-derived cellulase Exo2b and its application to improve cellulase activity in Trichoderma reesei , 2012, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[30]  Roberta Salomone,et al.  Pathways to Environmental Sustainability , 2014 .

[31]  S. Harikishan Biogas processing and utilization as an energy source , 2008 .

[32]  Daniele Cocco,et al.  Biogas from anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: Experimental results on pilot-scale and preliminary performance evaluation of a full-scale power plant , 2014 .

[33]  P. Dardenne,et al.  Biochemical methane potential prediction of plant biomasses: Comparing chemical composition versus near infrared methods and linear versus non-linear models. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[34]  Giovanni Mauromicale,et al.  Biomass, grain and energy yield in Cynara cardunculus L. as affected by fertilization, genotype and harvest time. , 2012 .

[35]  Barbara Amon,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of by-products of sugar beet and starch potato processing , 2009 .

[36]  L. Ledda,et al.  LCA Study of Oleaginous Bioenergy Chains in a Mediterranean Environment , 2014 .

[37]  Pekka Leskinen,et al.  Combining biogas LCA reviews with stakeholder interviews to analyse life cycle impacts at a practical level , 2014 .

[38]  G. Mauromicale,et al.  Globe artichoke leaves and floral stems as a source of bioactive compounds , 2013 .

[39]  Alastair J Ward,et al.  Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[40]  Ruth Delzeit,et al.  The impact of German biogas production on European and global agricultural markets, land use and the , 2013 .

[41]  L Sancho,et al.  Analysis of the stability of high-solids anaerobic digestion of agro-industrial waste and sewage sludge. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[42]  J. Gominho,et al.  Characterization of Cynara cardunculus L. stalks and their suitability for biogas production , 2012 .

[43]  S. M. García,et al.  Fresh biomass production and partitioning of aboveground growth in the three botanical varieties of Cynara cardunculus L. , 2012 .

[44]  David Styles,et al.  Cattle feed or bioenergy? Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas feedstock options on dairy farms , 2015 .