Influences of sampling effort on detected patterns and structuring processes of a Neotropical plant-hummingbird network.

Virtually all empirical ecological interaction networks to some extent suffer from undersampling. However, how limitations imposed by sampling incompleteness affect our understanding of ecological networks is still poorly explored, which may hinder further advances in the field. Here, we use a plant-hummingbird network with unprecedented sampling effort (2716 h of focal observations) from the Atlantic Rainforest in Brazil, to investigate how sampling effort affects the description of network structure (i.e. widely used network metrics) and the relative importance of distinct processes (i.e. species abundances vs. traits) in determining the frequency of pairwise interactions. By dividing the network into time slices representing a gradient of sampling effort, we show that quantitative metrics, such as interaction evenness, specialization (H2 '), weighted nestedness (wNODF) and modularity (Q; QuanBiMo algorithm) were less biased by sampling incompleteness than binary metrics. Furthermore, the significance of some network metrics changed along the sampling effort gradient. Nevertheless, the higher importance of traits in structuring the network was apparent even with small sampling effort. Our results (i) warn against using very poorly sampled networks as this may bias our understanding of networks, both their patterns and structuring processes, (ii) encourage the use of quantitative metrics little influenced by sampling when performing spatio-temporal comparisons and (iii) indicate that in networks strongly constrained by species traits, such as plant-hummingbird networks, even small sampling is sufficient to detect their relative importance for the frequencies of interactions. Finally, we argue that similar effects of sampling are expected for other highly specialized subnetworks.

[1]  L. L. Wolf,et al.  Ecological Organization of a Tropical, Highland Hummingbird Community , 1976 .

[2]  A. Chao.  Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population , 1984 .

[3]  J. Denslow,et al.  Neotropical Avian Frugivores: Patterns of Behavior, Morphology, and Nutrition, with Consequences for Fruit Selection , 1985 .

[4]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[5]  D. Paton,et al.  Bills and tongues of nectar‐feeding birds: A review of morphology, function and performance, with intercontinental comparisons , 1989 .

[6]  E. Temeles,et al.  Foraging ability of rufous hummingbirds on hummingbird flowers and hawkmoth flowers. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Ackerman,et al.  A Meager Nectar Offering by an Epiphytic Orchid is Better than Nothing , 1994 .

[8]  Lloyd Goldwasser,et al.  SAMPLING EFFECTS AND THE ESTIMATION OF FOOD‐WEB PROPERTIES , 1997 .

[9]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference , 2003 .

[10]  Bradford A. Hawkins,et al.  EFFECTS OF SAMPLING EFFORT ON CHARACTERIZATION OF FOOD-WEB STRUCTURE , 1999 .

[11]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[12]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[13]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  Latitudinal trends in plant‐pollinator interactions: are tropical plants more specialised? , 2002 .

[14]  Louis-Félix Bersier,et al.  QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTORS OF FOOD-WEB MATRICES , 2002 .

[15]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN PLANT–POLLINATOR MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS , 2002 .

[16]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Louis-Félix Bersier,et al.  Sampling effects and the robustness of quantitative and qualitative food-web descriptors. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  R. Suarez,et al.  Hummingbird flight: Sustaining the highest mass-specific metabolic rates among vertebrates , 1992, Experientia.

[19]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Asymmetric specialization and extinction risk in plant–flower visitor webs: a matter of morphology or abundance? , 2007, Oecologia.

[20]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[21]  Paulo Guimarães,et al.  Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Measuring specialization in species interaction networks , 2006, BMC Ecology.

[23]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Specialization, Constraints, and Conflicting Interests in Mutualistic Networks , 2007, Current Biology.

[24]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Ecological networks, nestedness and sampling effort , 2007 .

[25]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Joseph Tzanopoulos,et al.  Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[27]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[28]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks , 2008 .

[29]  Jochen Fründ,et al.  What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? , 2008, Ecology.

[30]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks , 2009 .

[31]  W. Ulrich.  Ecological interaction networks: prospects and pitfalls , 2009 .

[32]  Luciano Cagnolo,et al.  Uniting pattern and process in plant-animal mutualistic networks: a review. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[33]  Luciano Cagnolo,et al.  Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. , 2009, Ecology.

[34]  Anders Nielsen,et al.  Conservation of species interaction networks , 2010 .

[35]  Colin Fontaine,et al.  Stability of Ecological Communities and the Architecture of Mutualistic and Trophic Networks , 2010, Science.

[36]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  How to monitor ecological communities cost-efficiently: The example of plant–pollinator networks , 2010 .

[37]  Rodolfo Dirzo,et al.  Analysis of a hyper-diverse seed dispersal network: modularity and underlying mechanisms. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[38]  Mário Almeida-Neto,et al.  A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[39]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Sampling method influences the structure of plant–pollinator networks , 2011 .

[40]  L. Freitas,et al.  Do pollination syndromes cause modularity and predict interactions in a pollination network in tropical high‐altitude grasslands? , 2012 .

[41]  D. Vázquez,et al.  The strength of plant-pollinator interactions. , 2012, Ecology.

[42]  D. Vázquez,et al.  Evaluating sampling completeness in a desert plant-pollinator network. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[43]  A Rivera-Hutinel,et al.  Effects of sampling completeness on the structure of plant-pollinator networks. , 2012, Ecology.

[44]  Brody Sandel,et al.  Historical climate‐change influences modularity and nestedness of pollination networks , 2013 .

[45]  Luiz Fernando Bittencourt,et al.  MODULAR: Software for the Autonomous Computation of Modularity in Large Network Sets , 2013, ArXiv.

[46]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  The dimensionality of ecological networks. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[47]  Susanne A. Fritz,et al.  Ecological, historical and evolutionary determinants of modularity in weighted seed-dispersal networks. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[48]  Marlies Sazima,et al.  Processes entangling interactions in communities: forbidden links are more important than abundance in a hummingbird–plant network , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks , 2013, 1304.3218.

[50]  Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni,et al.  Morphological and Spatio‐Temporal Mismatches Shape a Neotropical Savanna Plant‐Hummingbird Network , 2014 .

[51]  M. Sazima,et al.  Low abundance of long-tongued pollinators leads to pollen limitation in four specialized hawkmoth-pollinated plants in the Atlantic Rain forest, Brazil , 2014, Naturwissenschaften.

[52]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  The macroecology of phylogenetically structured hummingbird–plant networks , 2015 .

[53]  W. Daniel Kissling,et al.  Multispecies interactions across trophic levels at macroscales: retrospective and future directions , 2015 .

[54]  Rodrigo Ramos-Jiliberto,et al.  A conceptual framework for studying the strength of plant-animal mutualistic interactions. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[55]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  The relative importance of color signaling for plant generalization in pollination networks , 2015 .

[56]  M. Nogales,et al.  Relative importance of phenotypic trait matching and species' abundances in determining plant–avian seed dispersal interactions in a small insular community , 2015, AoB PLANTS.

[57]  Nectar robbery by a hermit hummingbird: association to floral phenotype and its influence on flowers and network structure , 2015, Oecologia.

[58]  P. Chagnon,et al.  Characterizing topology of ecological networks along gradients: The limits of metrics' standardization , 2015 .

[59]  Jochen Fründ,et al.  Predicting ecosystem functions from biodiversity and mutualistic networks: an extension of trait-based concepts to plant - animal interactions , 2015 .

[60]  Jeremy W. Fox,et al.  Species traits and abundances predict metrics of plant–pollinator network structure, but not pairwise interactions , 2015 .

[61]  Jochen Fründ,et al.  Sampling bias is a challenge for quantifying specialization and network structure: lessons from a quantitative niche model , 2016 .