A Model-Based Analysis of Culture-Dependent Phenotypes of mESCs

Mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) can be maintained in a proliferative and undifferentiated state over many passages (self-renewal) while retaining the potential to give rise to every cell type of the organism (pluripotency). Autocrine FGF4/Erk signalling has been identified as a major stimulus for fate decisions and lineage commitment in these cells. Recent findings on serum-free culture conditions with specific inhibitors (known as 2i) demonstrate that the inhibition of this pathway reduces transcription factor heterogeneity and is vital to maintain ground state pluripotency of mESCs. We suggest a novel mathematical model to explicitly integrate FGF4/Erk signalling into an interaction network of key pluripotency factors (namely Oct4, Sox2, Nanog and Rex1). The envisaged model allows to explore whether and how proposed mechanisms and feedback regulations can account for different expression patterns in mESC cultures. We demonstrate that an FGF4/Erk-mediated negative feedback is sufficient to induce molecular heterogeneity with respect to Nanog and Rex1 expression and thus critically regulates the propensity for differentiation and the loss of pluripotency. Furthermore, we compare simulation results on the transcription factor dynamics in different self-renewing states and during differentiation with experimental data on a Rex1GFPd2 reporter cell line using flow cytometry and qRT-PCR measurements. Concluding from our results we argue that interaction between FGF4/Erk signalling and Nanog expression qualifies as a key mechanism to manipulate mESC pluripotency. In particular, we infer that ground state pluripotency under 2i is achieved by shifting stable expression pattern of Nanog from a bistable into a monostable regulation impeding stochastic state transitions. Furthermore, we derive testable predictions on altering the degree of Nanog heterogeneity and on the frequency of state transitions in LIF/serum conditions to challenge our model assumptions.

[1]  Yang Luo,et al.  Cell signalling regulates dynamics of Nanog distribution in embryonic stem cell populations , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  Patrick S. Stumpf,et al.  Nanog-dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[3]  Janet Rossant,et al.  Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 Determines Trophectoderm Differentiation , 2005, Cell.

[4]  K. O'Shea,et al.  Self-renewal vs. Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells1 , 2004, Biology of reproduction.

[5]  Nicola Festuccia,et al.  OCT4/SOX2‐independent Nanog autorepression modulates heterogeneous Nanog gene expression in mouse ES cells , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[6]  Austin G Smith,et al.  Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 alleviates Tcf3 repression of the pluripotency network and increases embryonic stem cell resistance to differentiation , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[7]  M. Kaufman,et al.  Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos , 1981, Nature.

[8]  H. Niwa,et al.  Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undifferentiated ES cell culture , 2008, Development.

[9]  G. Pan,et al.  Regulation of the Pluripotency Marker Rex-1 by Nanog and Sox2* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  J. Nichols,et al.  Naive and primed pluripotent states. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[11]  J. Nichols,et al.  Pluripotency in the embryo and in culture. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[12]  T. Burdon,et al.  Oct‐4 Knockdown Induces Similar Patterns of Endoderm and Trophoblast Differentiation Markers in Human and Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2004, Stem cells.

[13]  J. Nichols,et al.  Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development , 2007, Nature.

[14]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[15]  Austin G Smith,et al.  Signaling Mechanisms Regulating Self-Renewal and Differentiation of Pluripotent Embryonic Stem Cells , 1999, Cells Tissues Organs.

[16]  P. Robson,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation of Nanog by OCT4 and SOX2* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Austin G Smith,et al.  The ground state of pluripotency. , 2010, Biochemical Society transactions.

[18]  G. Martin,et al.  Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  H. Schöler,et al.  Formation of Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Mammalian Embryo Depends on the POU Transcription Factor Oct4 , 1998, Cell.

[20]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Transcriptional Dynamics of the Embryonic Stem Cell Switch , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  A. Smith,et al.  Self-renewal of pluripotent embryonic stem cells is mediated via activation of STAT3. , 1998, Genes & development.

[22]  Austin G Smith,et al.  FGF stimulation of the Erk1/2 signalling cascade triggers transition of pluripotent embryonic stem cells from self-renewal to lineage commitment , 2007, Development.

[23]  N. Terada,et al.  A Heterogeneous Expression Pattern for Nanog in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007, Stem cells.

[24]  J. Nichols,et al.  Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2003, Cell.

[25]  Tao Wang,et al.  Esrrb Activates Oct4 Transcription and Sustains Self-renewal and Pluripotency in Embryonic Stem Cells* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  Hitoshi Niwa,et al.  How is pluripotency determined and maintained? , 2007, Development.

[27]  M. Torres-Padilla,et al.  Control of ground-state pluripotency by allelic regulation of Nanog , 2012, Nature.

[28]  X. Chen,et al.  The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[29]  Hitoshi Niwa,et al.  A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells , 2009, Nature.

[30]  C. Lim,et al.  Regulated Fluctuations in Nanog Expression Mediate Cell Fate Decisions in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, PLoS biology.

[31]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[32]  Austin G Smith,et al.  Defined conditions for neural commitment and differentiation. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[33]  Ge Guo,et al.  Nanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State , 2009, Cell.

[34]  Austin G Smith,et al.  Capturing Pluripotency , 2008, Cell.

[35]  B. Nijmeijer,et al.  The pluripotency rheostat Nanog functions as a dimer. , 2008, The Biochemical journal.

[36]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Probing the role of stochasticity in a model of the embryonic stem cell – heterogeneous gene expression and reprogramming efficiency , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[37]  Anagha Joshi,et al.  Esrrb Is a Pivotal Target of the Gsk3/Tcf3 Axis Regulating Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[38]  Bing Lim,et al.  A precarious balance: pluripotency factors as lineage specifiers. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[39]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  A Computational Model for Understanding Stem Cell, Trophectoderm and Endoderm Lineage Determination , 2008, PloS one.

[40]  Y. Bergman,et al.  Rex-1, a Gene Encoding a Transcription Factor Expressed in the Early Embryo, Is Regulated via Oct-3/4 and Oct-6 Binding to an Octamer Site and a Novel Protein, Rox-1, Binding to an Adjacent Site , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[41]  B. Doble,et al.  The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal , 2008, Nature.

[42]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[43]  H. Ng,et al.  Reduced Oct4 Expression Directs a Robust Pluripotent State with Distinct Signaling Activity and Increased Enhancer Occupancy by Oct4 and Nanog , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[44]  J. Rossant,et al.  Genetic regulation of stem cell origins in the mouse embryo , 2005, Clinical genetics.

[45]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  Dissecting Oct3/4-Regulated Gene Networks in Embryonic Stem Cells by Expression Profiling , 2006, PloS one.

[46]  Yang Yang,et al.  Kruppel-like Factor 4 (Klf4) Prevents Embryonic Stem (ES) Cell Differentiation by Regulating Nanog Gene Expression* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  S. Orkin,et al.  Requirement of Nanog dimerization for stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Julian Gingold,et al.  Zfp281 mediates Nanog autorepression through recruitment of the NuRD complex and inhibits somatic cell reprogramming , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Jennifer Nichols,et al.  The Transcriptional and Epigenomic Foundations of Ground State Pluripotency , 2012, Cell.

[50]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Nanog Variability and Pluripotency Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cells - Insights from a Mathematical Model Analysis , 2010, PloS one.

[51]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Towards an understanding of lineage specification in hematopoietic stem cells: a mathematical model for the interaction of transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[52]  N. Terada,et al.  The Grb2/Mek Pathway Represses Nanog in Murine Embryonic Stem Cells , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[53]  G. Pan,et al.  A negative feedback loop of transcription factors that controls stem cell pluripotency and self‐renewal , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[54]  Xi Chen,et al.  Reciprocal Transcriptional Regulation of Pou5f1 and Sox2 via the Oct4/Sox2 Complex in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[55]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Noise-Driven Stem Cell and Progenitor Population Dynamics , 2008, PloS one.

[56]  Nicola Festuccia,et al.  Esrrb Is a Direct Nanog Target Gene that Can Substitute for Nanog Function in Pluripotent Cells , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[57]  D. Ambrosetti,et al.  Synergistic activation of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer by Sox2 and Oct-3 depends on protein-protein interactions facilitated by a specific spatial arrangement of factor binding sites , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[58]  Geppino Falco,et al.  An in situ hybridization-based screen for heterogeneously expressed genes in mouse ES cells. , 2008, Gene expression patterns : GEP.

[59]  C. Peterson,et al.  Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[60]  Gabriel S. Eichler,et al.  Cell fates as high-dimensional attractor states of a complex gene regulatory network. , 2005, Physical review letters.