Virtual reality crowd simulation: effects of agent density on user experience and behaviour

Agent-based crowd simulations are used for modelling building and space usage, allowing designers to explore hypothetical real-world scenarios, including extraordinary events such as evacuations. Existing work which engages virtual reality (VR) as a platform for crowd simulations has been primarily focussed on the validation of simulation models through observation; the use of interactions such as gaze to enhance a sense of immersion; or studies of proxemics. In this work, we extend previous studies of proxemics and examine the effects of varying crowd density on user experience and behaviour. We have created a simulation in which participants walk freely and perform a routine manual task, whilst interacting with agents controlled by a typical social force simulation model. We examine and report the effects of crowd density on both affective state and behaviour. Our results show a significant increase in negative affect with density, measured using a self-report scale. We further show significant differences in some aspects of user behaviours, using video analysis, and discuss how our results relate to VR simulation design for mixed human–agent scenarios.

[1]  Gerd Bruder,et al.  Virtual proxemics: Locomotion in the presence of obstacles in large immersive projection environments , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[2]  Nuria Pelechano,et al.  Feeling crowded yet?: crowd simulations for VR , 2016, 2016 IEEE Virtual Humans and Crowds for Immersive Environments (VHCIE).

[3]  Isabelle Hupont,et al.  How do new visual immersive systems influence gaming QoE? A use case of serious gaming with Oculus Rift , 2015, 2015 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[4]  Edward T. Hall,et al.  A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior1 , 1963 .

[5]  Philip W. Fink,et al.  Obstacle avoidance during walking in real and virtual environments , 2007, TAP.

[6]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  The Responses of People to Virtual Humans in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  Robert S. Allison,et al.  Personal Space in Virtual Reality , 2003, TAP.

[8]  Liang Chen,et al.  Modeling pedestrian movement at the hall of high-speed railway station during the check-in process , 2017 .

[9]  Tabitha C. Peck,et al.  Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[10]  Henrik M. Peperkorn,et al.  The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: a review of research in virtual reality , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Charalambos Poullis,et al.  Psychophysiological responses to virtual crowds: Implications for wearable computing , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII).

[12]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Within-crowd immersive evaluation of collision avoidance behaviors , 2012, VRCAI '12.

[13]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[14]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Crowd simulation for interactive virtual environments and VRtraining systems , 2001 .

[15]  Ken Eason,et al.  Factors influencing experience in crowds - The participant perspective. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[17]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Virtual Crowds: Methods, Simulation, and Control (Synthesis Lectures on Computer Graphics and Animation) , 2008 .

[18]  Yi Li,et al.  Modeling, simulation and analysis of the evacuation process on stairs in a multi-floor classroom building of a primary school , 2017 .

[19]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  C. Botella,et al.  Virtual reality exposure therapy in anxiety disorders: a quantitative meta‐analysis , 2012, Depression and anxiety.

[21]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Interactive and adaptive data-driven crowd simulation , 2016, 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[22]  Mel Slater,et al.  Proxemics with multiple dynamic characters in an immersive virtual environment , 2010, TAP.

[23]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Evaluating collision avoidance effects on discomfort in virtual environments , 2017, 2017 IEEE Virtual Humans and Crowds for Immersive Environments (VHCIE).

[24]  Yiorgos Chrysanthou,et al.  Interaction with virtual crowd in Immersive and semi‐Immersive Virtual Reality systems , 2017, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[25]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Right of way , 2013, The Visual Computer.

[26]  Mark H. Overmars,et al.  A Predictive Collision Avoidance Model for Pedestrian Simulation , 2009, MIG.

[27]  Daniele Fontanelli,et al.  Walking Ahead: The Headed Social Force Model , 2017, PloS one.

[28]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Crowd behaviour during high-stress evacuations in an immersive virtual environment , 2016, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[29]  M. Dawson,et al.  The electrodermal system , 2007 .

[30]  Yiorgos Chrysanthou,et al.  Interaction with virtual agents — Comparison of the participants' experience between an IVR and a semi-IVR system , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[31]  Michael Batty,et al.  Crowd and environmental management during mass gatherings. , 2012, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[32]  Hyun Seung Yang,et al.  Immersive human-in-the-loop HMD evaluation of dynamic group behavior in a pedestrian crowd simulation that uses group agent-based steering , 2013, VRCAI '13.

[33]  Julien Pettré,et al.  Going Through, Going Around: A Study on Individual Avoidance of Groups , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[34]  W. Boucsein.  Electrodermal activity, 2nd ed. , 2012 .

[35]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Being a part of the crowd: towards validating VR crowds using presence , 2008, AAMAS.

[36]  Rachel McDonnell,et al.  The Effect of Realistic Appearance of Virtual Characters in Immersive Environments - Does the Character's Personality Play a Role? , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[37]  C. Dorso,et al.  Room evacuation through two contiguous exits , 2016, 1607.07379.

[38]  Gonzalo Ferrer,et al.  Robot companion: A social-force based approach with human awareness-navigation in crowded environments , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[39]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[40]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Simulation of pedestrian crowds in normal and evacuation situations , 2002 .

[41]  Allison W. McCulloch,et al.  Developing and Using a Codebook for the Analysis of Interview Data: An Example from a Professional Development Research Project , 2011 .

[42]  Hyun Seung Yang,et al.  Safe Navigation of Pedestrians in Social Groups in a Virtual Urban Environment , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Cyberworlds.

[43]  Xiaoping Zheng,et al.  Modeling crowd evacuation of a building based on seven methodological approaches , 2009 .

[44]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  PedVR: simulating gaze-based interactions between a real user and virtual crowds , 2016, VRST.

[45]  S. Curtis,et al.  Right of way , 2012, The Visual Computer.

[46]  Bradford J McFadyen,et al.  Characteristics of personal space during obstacle circumvention in physical and virtual environments. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[47]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Effects of Different Types of Virtual Reality Display on Presence and Learning in a Safety Training Scenario , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.