Effect of subject types on the production of auxiliary is in young English-speaking children.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Pamela A Hadley,et al. The onset of tense marking in children at risk for specific language impairment. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[2] Andrew Radford,et al. Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The Nature of Early Child Grammars of English , 1990 .
[3] M. Rispoli,et al. Case and agreement in English language development , 1999, Journal of Child Language.
[4] Stephen Wilson. Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English , 2003, Journal of Child Language.
[5] B MacWhinney,et al. Phonological priming in children's picture naming , 2000, Journal of Child Language.
[6] Kenneth Wexler,et al. The development of inflection in a biologically based theory of language acquisition. , 1996 .
[7] M. Rispoli,et al. The growth of tense productivity. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[8] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.
[9] J. Pine,et al. Tense over time: testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model as an account of the pattern of tense-marking provision in early child English* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.
[10] C. Dollaghan,et al. Grammatical morpheme production in 4-year-old children. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[11] R. Rush,et al. The vocabulary of first-grade children , 1982 .
[12] D. Slobin. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 1987 .
[13] M. Tomasello. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .
[14] F. Ferreira,et al. How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums , 2002 .
[15] David Adger,et al. Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach , 2003 .
[16] Peter M. Duppenthaler. Maturational Constraints on Language Learning , 1990 .
[17] R. Brown,et al. A First Language , 1973 .
[18] Fernand Gobet,et al. Modeling the Developmental Patterning of Finiteness Marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish Using MOSAIC , 2007, Cogn. Sci..
[19] Anna L Theakston,et al. The influence of discourse context on children's provision of auxiliary BE* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.
[20] Joan L. Bybee. 4. Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure , 2002 .
[21] T. Jaeger,et al. Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.
[22] Irina A. Sekerina,et al. The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children , 1999, Cognition.
[23] M L Rice,et al. Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[24] G. Conti-Ramsden,et al. Development of copula and auxiliary BE in children with Specific Language Impairment and younger unaffected controls∗ , 2002 .
[25] Anna L. Theakston,et al. The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: BE and HAVE , 2005 .
[26] Ben Ambridge,et al. Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model using an elicited imitation paradigm , 2006, Journal of Child Language.
[27] Anna L. Theakston,et al. The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children's use of referring expressions , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[28] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses , 2009, Cognition.
[29] P. Bloom. Subjectlees sentences in child language , 1990 .
[30] B. MacWhinney. The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .
[31] Carson T. Schütze,et al. Productive inventory and case/agreement contingencies: a methodological note on Rispoli (1999) , 2001, Journal of Child Language.
[32] P. Dixon. Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs , 2008 .
[33] R. Baayen,et al. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .
[34] E. Belgin,et al. CBP02 Turkish adaptation of speech and language disorders test: “Preschool Language Scale, fourth edition: PLS-4” , 2007 .
[35] Elena Lieven. Learning the English auxiliary: A Usage-based Approach, In H. Behrens (Ed.): Corpora in Language Acquisition Research: Finding Structure in Data , 2008 .
[36] Joan L. Bybee,et al. Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .
[37] M L Rice,et al. Tense over time: the longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[38] Alison J. Bahnsen,et al. Predictors of morphosyntactic growth in typically developing toddlers: contributions of parent input and child sex. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[39] Anna L. Theakston,et al. The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: auxiliary BE. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[40] Arturo E. Hernandez,et al. Balancing bilinguals: lexical-semantic production and cognitive processing in children learning Spanish and English. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[41] Kenneth Wexler,et al. Subject Case in Children With SLI and Unaffected Controls: Evidence for the Agr/Tns Omission Model , 1998 .
[42] Ewa Dąbrowska,et al. Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions , 2005 .
[43] Ping Li,et al. Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary , 2008, Journal of Child Language.
[44] H. Bergh,et al. Examples of Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects and with Binomial Data. , 2008 .
[45] Jon F. Miller,et al. Assessing Language Production in Children: Experimental Procedures , 1981 .
[46] M. Tomasello. Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.
[47] J. Jaccard. Interaction effects in logistic regression , 2001 .
[48] K. Wexler. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage , 1998 .
[49] Philip S. Dale,et al. Macarthur Communicative Development Inventories , 1992 .
[50] P. Menyuk,et al. Variability in children's use of grammatical morphemes , 1992, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[51] Ewa Dabrowska,et al. From formula to schema: The acquisition of English questions , 2001 .
[52] Linda B. Smith,et al. Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond? , 1999, Cognition.
[53] Bertram F. Malle,et al. The evolution of language out of pre-language , 2002 .
[54] L. Goffman,et al. Growth of Language Skills in Preschool Children With Specific Language Impairment: Implications for Assessment and Intervention , 2000 .
[55] Anna L. Theakston,et al. Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model: why the data on children's use of non-nominative 3psg subjects count against the ATOM , 2005, Journal of Child Language.
[56] Andrew Radford,et al. Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English , 2004 .
[57] Anna L. Theakston,et al. The acquisition of auxiliaries BE and HAVE: an elicitation study* , 2005, Journal of Child Language.