An Integrative Framework for Construct Validity

[1]  P. Boeck,et al.  Propositional reasoning: The differential contribution of “rules” to the difficulty of complex reasoning problems , 2001, Memory & Cognition.

[2]  Susan E. Embretson,et al.  Generating items during testing: Psychometric issues and models , 1999 .

[3]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  Interference within the Focus of Attention: Working Memory Tasks Reflect More than Temporary Maintenance We Thank Candice Morey for Sharing Her Visual Arrays Tasks with Our Lab. We Additionally Thank , 2022 .

[4]  Joanna S. Gorin.  Test Design with Cognition in Mind , 2007 .

[5]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Predicting the difficulty of complex logical reasoning problems , 2006 .

[6]  S. Whitely.  Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. , 1983 .

[7]  Susan E. Embretson,et al.  Designing Cognitive Complexity in Mathematical Problem-Solving Items , 2010 .

[8]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  C. Hoyt.  Test reliability estimated by analysis of variance , 1941 .

[10]  Susan E. Embretson,et al.  Construct Validity: A Universal Validity System or Just Another Test Evaluation Procedure? , 2007 .

[11]  Mark J. Gierl,et al.  Defining and Evaluating Models of Cognition Used in Educational Measurement to Make Inferences about Examinees' Thinking Processes. , 2007 .

[12]  M A Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1990 What one intelligence test measures : A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test , 2016 .

[13]  Wells HivelyII,et al.  A “UNIVERSE‐DEFINED” SYSTEM OF ARITHMETIC ACHIEVEMENT TESTS1 , 1968 .