Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Kyle | K. Calvin | M. Wise | E. Stehfest | K. Riahi | M. Obersteiner | H. Lotze-Campen | A. Popp | M. Gusti | P. Havlík | A. Tabeau | D. P. Vuuren | Kiyoshi Takahashi | S. Fujimori | J. Dietrich | B. Bodirsky | Stephanie T. Waldhoff | H. Valin | E. Kriegler | Florian Humpenöder | I. Weindl | Oliver Fricko | Jonathan C. Doelmann | T. Hasegawa
[1] Wolfgang Lutz,et al. The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100 , 2017, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.
[2] George C. Hurtt,et al. The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP): Rationale and experimental design , 2016 .
[3] Stephen R. Carpenter,et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios , 2016, Sustainability Science.
[4] Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,et al. Global Food Demand Scenarios for the 21st Century , 2015, PloS one.
[5] Christoph Schmitz,et al. Livestock in a changing climate: production system transitions as an adaptation strategy for agriculture , 2015 .
[6] J.C.M. van Meijl,et al. Climate change impacts on agriculture in 2050 under a range of plausible socioeconomic and emissions scenarios , 2015 .
[7] Alessandro Flammini,et al. The Contribution of Agriculture, Forestry and other Land Use activities to Global Warming, 1990–2012 , 2015, Global change biology.
[8] James A. Edmonds,et al. Accounting for radiative forcing from albedo change in future global land-use scenarios , 2015, Climatic Change.
[9] Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,et al. Land-use protection for climate change mitigation , 2014 .
[10] Kiyoshi Takahashi,et al. Land use representation in a global CGE model for long-term simulation: CET vs. logit functions , 2014, Food Security.
[11] James A. Edmonds,et al. ECONOMIC AND PHYSICAL MODELING OF LAND USE IN GCAM 3.0 AND AN APPLICATION TO AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY, LAND, AND TERRESTRIAL CARBON , 2014 .
[12] D. Vuuren,et al. Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0 : Model description and policy applications , 2014 .
[13] Christoph Schmitz,et al. Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution , 2014, Nature Communications.
[14] Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,et al. Investigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategies , 2014, Environmental Research Letters.
[15] Andrew E. Suyker,et al. Land management and land-cover change have impacts of similar magnitude on surface temperature , 2014 .
[16] Elmar Kriegler,et al. Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options , 2014, Climatic Change.
[17] E. Schmid,et al. Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[18] Thomas J. Wilbanks,et al. SSPs from an impact and adaptation perspective , 2014, Climatic Change.
[19] Keywan Riahi,et al. A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture , 2014, Climatic Change.
[20] P. Kyle,et al. Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic responses to biophysical shocks , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[21] N. H. Ravindranath,et al. How much land‐based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? , 2013, Global change biology.
[22] Thomas Hertel,et al. Climate change mitigation policies and poverty in developing countries , 2013 .
[23] Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al. Scenarios in Global Environmental Assessments: Key characteristics and lessons for future use , 2012 .
[24] Brian C. O'Neill,et al. The Need for and Use of Socio-Economic Scenarios for Climate Change Analysis , 2012 .
[25] Keywan Riahi,et al. Chapter 17 - Energy Pathways for Sustainable Development , 2012 .
[26] N. Ramankutty,et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management , 2012, Nature.
[27] J. Bruinsma,et al. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision , 2012 .
[28] Christoph Schmitz,et al. Trading more food: Implications for land use, greenhouse gas emissions, and the food system , 2012 .
[29] D. Tilman,et al. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[30] E. Stehfest,et al. Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands , 2011 .
[31] A. Thomson,et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .
[32] Dieter Gerten,et al. The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system , 2011 .
[33] R. B. Jackson,et al. Biophysical considerations in forestry for climate protection , 2011 .
[34] R. Westaway,et al. Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: a review of approaches, benefits, and risks , 2011 .
[35] E. Lambin,et al. INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity , 2011 .
[36] H. Steinfeld,et al. Livestock production and the global environment: Consume less or produce better? , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[37] Michael Obersteiner,et al. Competition for land , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[38] H. Lotze-Campen,et al. Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production , 2010 .
[39] David B Lobell,et al. Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[40] R. DeFries,et al. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970–2005 , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[41] Bas Eickhout,et al. The effect of agricultural trade liberalisation on land-use related greenhouse gas emissions , 2009 .
[42] C. Müller,et al. Uncertainties in climate responses to past land cover change: First results from the LUCID intercomparison study , 2009 .
[43] S. Carpenter,et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[44] Bas Eickhout,et al. Climate benefits of changing diet , 2009 .
[45] Christopher B. Field,et al. Protecting climate with forests , 2008 .
[46] G. Bonan. Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.
[47] Peter Kareiva,et al. Domesticated Nature: Shaping Landscapes and Ecosystems for Human Welfare , 2007, Science.
[48] Ian McCallum,et al. Predicting the deforestation-trend under different carbon-prices , 2006, Carbon balance and management.
[49] S. Carpenter,et al. Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.
[50] K. Riahi,et al. Managing Climate Risk , 2001, Science.
[51] Alexei G. Sankovski,et al. Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .
[52] K. Calvin,et al. Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .
[53] C. Müller,et al. Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm , 2017 .
[54] M. Strubegger,et al. Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives , 2017 .
[55] K. Riahi,et al. The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century , 2017 .
[56] Jean Chateau,et al. Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .
[57] J. Eom,et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .
[58] T. Hertel,et al. Climate Change Impacts in Agriculture , 2016 .
[59] John M. Antle,et al. Representative Agricultural Pathways and Scenarios for Regional Integrated Assessment of Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability, and Adaptation , 2015 .
[60] Christoph Schmitz,et al. Forecasting technological change in agriculture—An endogenous implementation in a global land use model , 2014 .
[61] P. Kyle,et al. Why do global long‐term scenarios for agriculture differ? An overview of the AgMIP Global Economic Model Intercomparison , 2014 .
[62] Keywan Riahi,et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions , 2014, Climatic Change.
[63] Tomoko Hasegawa,et al. The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models , 2014 .
[64] Christoph Schmitz,et al. Comparing supply-side specifications in models of global agriculture and the food system , 2014 .
[65] P. Kyle,et al. Land‐use change trajectories up to 2050: insights from a global agro‐economic model comparison , 2014 .
[66] Gordon B. Bonan,et al. Benefits of Forests Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate , 2014 .
[67] Keywan Riahi,et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways , 2013, Climatic Change.
[68] J. Edmonds,et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions , 2013, Climatic Change.
[69] Michael Obersteiner,et al. Crop Productivity and the Global Livestock Sector: Implications for Land Use Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2013 .
[70] Keywan Riahi,et al. Energy Pathways for Sustainable Development , 2012 .
[71] Costas P. Pappis,et al. Climate Change Mitigation Policies , 2011 .