Local computation of decision-relevant net sensory evidence in parietal cortex.

To investigate the contribution of parietal cortex to perceptual decisions, we trained monkeys on a perceptual decision task that allowed simultaneous experimental control over how much sensory evidence was provided for each of 3 possible alternative choices and recorded single unit activity and local field potentials (LFPs) from the lateral intraparietal area (LIP). While both the behavior and the spiking activity were largely determined by the difference between how much supporting sensory evidence was provided for a particular choice (pro evidence) and how much sensory evidence was provided for the other alternatives (anti evidence), the LFP reflected roughly the sum of these 2 components. Furthermore, the firing rates showed an earlier influence of the anti evidence than the pro evidence. These observations indicate that LIP does not simply receive already precomputed decision signals but that it plays an active role in computing the decision-relevant net sensory evidence and that this local computation is reflected in the LFP. The results further demonstrate that the competition between the different alternatives cannot solely be mediated by lateral or feedback inhibition, as proposed by a major class of decision models but that feedforward inhibition makes an important contribution.

[1]  R. Andersen,et al.  Cortical Local Field Potential Encodes Movement Intentions in the Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[2]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  R. Shapley,et al.  Spatial Spread of the Local Field Potential and its Laminar Variation in Visual Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[7]  S. Bressler,et al.  Response preparation and inhibition: The role of the cortical sensorimotor beta rhythm , 2008, Neuroscience.

[8]  D N Mastronarde,et al.  Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. II. Retinal inputs and the generation of receptive-field properties. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Gregor Rainer Localizing Cortical Computations during Visual Selection , 2008, Neuron.

[10]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[12]  R. Andersen,et al.  Visual receptive field organization and cortico‐cortical connections of the lateral intraparietal area (area LIP) in the macaque , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Corticocortical connections of visual, sensorimotor, and multimodal processing areas in the parietal lobe of the macaque monkey , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  L. A. Goodman On Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Multinomial Proportions , 1965 .

[15]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Pattern Motion Selectivity of Spiking Outputs and Local Field Potentials in Macaque Visual Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[18]  R. Romo,et al.  Decoding a Perceptual Decision Process across Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[19]  A. Saul,et al.  Lagged Cells , 2008, Neurosignals.

[20]  Jochen Ditterich,et al.  A Comparison between Mechanisms of Multi-Alternative Perceptual Decision Making: Ability to Explain Human Behavior, Predictions for Neurophysiology, and Relationship with Decision Theory , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[21]  Ernst Niebur,et al.  Effect of Stimulus Intensity on the Spike–Local Field Potential Relationship in the Secondary Somatosensory Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Tactile Spatial Attention Enhances Gamma-Band Activity in Somatosensory Cortex and Reduces Low-Frequency Activity in Parieto-Occipital Areas , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  The encoding of alternatives in multiple-choice decision making , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Alan B Saul,et al.  Lagged cells in alert monkey lateral geniculate nucleus , 2008, Visual Neuroscience.

[25]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Experience-dependent representation of visual categories in parietal cortex , 2006, Nature.

[26]  P. Heggelund,et al.  Neurotransmitter receptors mediating excitatory input to cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Lagged cells. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Jochen Ditterich,et al.  Perceptual Decisions between Multiple Directions of Visual Motion , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  S Celebrini,et al.  Microstimulation of extrastriate area MST influences performance on a direction discrimination task. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Decision-making with multiple alternatives , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  M. Carandini,et al.  Local Origin of Field Potentials in Visual Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[31]  W. Newsome,et al.  Local Field Potential in Cortical Area MT: Stimulus Tuning and Behavioral Correlations , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Microstimulation of visual cortex affects the speed of perceptual decisions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[34]  Timothy J. Gawne,et al.  The local and non-local components of the local field potential in awake primate visual cortex , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Shadlen,et al.  A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Encoding of Naturalistic Stimuli by Local Field Potential Spectra in Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Similarity Effect and Optimal Control of Multiple-Choice Decision Making , 2008, Neuron.

[38]  G. Freyd,et al.  Separate Signals for Target Selection and Movement Specification in the Superior Colliculus , 2022 .

[39]  Jochen Ditterich,et al.  Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: Behavior and physiology , 2006, Neural Networks.

[40]  O. Paulsen,et al.  Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience Cellular Neuroscience Hippocampal Oscillations , 2022 .

[41]  D N Mastronarde,et al.  Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Receptive-field properties and classification of cells. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  U. Mitzdorf Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. , 1985, Physiological reviews.

[43]  Xiao-Jing Wang Neurophysiological and computational principles of cortical rhythms in cognition. , 2010, Physiological reviews.

[44]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: II. Evidence for segregated corticocortical networks linking sensory and limbic areas with the frontal lobe , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[45]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[47]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[48]  Klas H. Pettersen,et al.  Laminar population analysis: estimating firing rates and evoked synaptic activity from multielectrode recordings in rat barrel cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Bijan Pesaran,et al.  Free choice activates a decision circuit between frontal and parietal cortex , 2008, Nature.

[50]  A. L. Humphrey,et al.  Spatial and temporal response properties of lagged and nonlagged cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[52]  S. Cruikshank,et al.  Synaptic basis for intense thalamocortical activation of feedforward inhibitory cells in neocortex , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  T. P. S. Powell,et al.  The ipsilateral corticocortical connections of area 7 with the frontal lobe in the monkey , 1990, Brain Research.

[54]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Identifying robust and sensitive frequency bands for interrogating neural oscillations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[55]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.