Why Reichenbach wasn't entirely wrong, and Poincaré was almost right, about geometric conventionalism.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Y. Obukhov,et al. Demystifying autoparallels in alternative gravity , 2021, Physical Review D.
[2] Patrick M. Duerr. Theory (In-)Equivalence and conventionalism in f(R) gravity. , 2021, Studies in history and philosophy of science.
[3] R. Disalle. Carnap, Einstein, and the Empirical Foundations of Space-Time Geometry , 2021 .
[4] T. Ryckman. Einstein, General Relativity, and Logical Empiricism , 2021 .
[5] S. Haro,et al. The Empirical Under-Determination Argument Against Scientific Realism for Dual Theories , 2021, Erkenntnis.
[6] V. Faraoni,et al. Quasi-geodesics in relativistic gravity , 2020, The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields.
[7] Sebastian De Haro,et al. Theoretical equivalence and duality , 2019, Synthese.
[8] J. Butterfield. On Dualities and Equivalences between Physical Theories , 2018, Philosophy Beyond Spacetime.
[9] S. Schroeder. Conventionalism , 2020, Wittgenstein on Mathematics.
[10] J. Weatherall. Two dogmas of dynamicism , 2020, Synthese.
[11] N. C. Martens,et al. Sophistry about symmetries? , 2020, Synthese.
[12] D. Rubiera-García,et al. Geometric inequivalence of metric and Palatini formulations of General Relativity , 2019, Physics Letters B.
[13] Pablo Acuña. Charting the landscape of interpretation, theory rivalry, and underdetermination in quantum mechanics , 2019, Synthese.
[14] Patrick M. Duerr. Fantastic Beasts and where (not) to find them: Local gravitational energy and energy conservation in general relativity , 2019, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.
[15] J. B. Pitts. Space-time constructivism vs. modal provincialism: Or, how special relativistic theories needn't show Minkowski chronogeometry , 2017, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.
[16] James Read,et al. Motivating dualities , 2018, Synthese.
[17] J. B. Pitts,et al. Kant, Schlick and Friedman on Space, Time and Gravity in Light of Three Lessons from Particle Physics , 2018, 1803.11192.
[18] T. Møller-Nielsen. Invariance, Interpretation, and Motivation , 2017, Philosophy of Science.
[19] Marco Giovanelli. Traditions in Collision: The Emergence of Logical Empiricism between the Riemannian and Helmholtzian Traditions , 2017, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science.
[20] J. B. Pitts,et al. Einstein's Equations for Spin $2$ Mass $0$ from Noether's Converse Hilbertian Assertion , 2016, 1611.02673.
[21] Thomas William Barrett,et al. Glymour and Quine on Theoretical Equivalence , 2015, Journal of Philosophical Logic.
[22] Marco Giovanelli. ... But I still can't get rid of a sense of artificiality': The Reichenbach-Einstein debate on the geometrization of the electromagnetic field , 2016 .
[23] W. Trageser. Gravitation und Elektrizität , 2016 .
[24] Milena Ivanova. Conventionalism, structuralism and neo-Kantianism in Poincaré's philosophy of science , 2015 .
[25] J. B. Pitts. Space-time Philosophy Reconstructed via Massive Nordstr\"om Scalar Gravities? Laws vs. Geometry, Conventionality, and Underdetermination , 2015, 1509.03303.
[26] Dennis Lehmkuhl. Why Einstein did not believe that General Relativity geometrizes gravity , 2014 .
[27] James Owen Weatherall,et al. The Geometry of Conventionality , 2013, Philosophy of Science.
[28] Milena Ivanova. Is There a Place for Epistemic Virtues in Theory Choice , 2014 .
[29] Janet Folina. Poincaré and the Invention of Convention , 2014 .
[30] Pablo Acuña,et al. Artificial Examples of Empirical Equivalence , 2014, New Directions in the Philosophy of Science.
[31] Marco Giovanelli. The Forgotten Tradition: How the Logical Empiricists Missed the Philosophical Significance of the Work of Riemann, Christoffel and Ricci , 2013 .
[32] Marco Giovanelli,et al. Talking at cross-purposes: how Einstein and the logical empiricists never agreed on what they were disagreeing about , 2012, Synthese.
[33] C. Romero,et al. General relativity and Weyl geometry , 2012, 1201.1469.
[34] J. Stachel. Conformal and projective structures in general relativity , 2011 .
[35] J. B. Pitts. Permanent Underdetermination from Approximate Empirical Equivalence in Field Theory: Massless and Massive Scalar Gravity, Neutrino, Electromagnetic, Yang–Mills and Gravitational Theories , 2011, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[36] J. B. Pitts,et al. Gauge-invariant localization of infinitely many gravitational energies from all possible auxiliary structures , 2009, 0902.1288.
[37] Steven F. Savitt. :Understanding Space-Time: The Philosophical Development of Physics from Newton to Einstein , 2009 .
[38] Thomas Oberdan. Geometry, Convention, and the Relativized Apriori: The Schlick—Reichenbach Correspondence , 2009 .
[39] J. Butterfield. Reconsidering Relativistic Causality , 2007, 0708.2189.
[40] V. Faraoni,et al. Pseudo)issue of the conformal frame revisited , 2006, gr-qc/0612075.
[41] J. Stachel. The Story of Newstein or: Is Gravity Just Another Pretty Force? , 2007 .
[42] S. Toulmin,et al. Einstein and the Development of Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Science , 2005 .
[43] I. Shapiro,et al. On Useful Conformal Tranformations In General Relativity , 2004, gr-qc/0412113.
[44] W. Schieve,et al. Null Cones and Einstein's Equations in Minkowski Spacetime , 2004, gr-qc/0406102.
[45] D. Howard. Einstein and Duhem , 1990, Synthese.
[46] D. Dieks. Gravitation as a universal force , 1987, Synthese.
[47] L. Beauregard. Reichenbach and conventionalism , 1977, Synthese.
[48] W. Quine,et al. Carnap and logical truth , 2004, Synthese.
[49] H. Lyre,et al. Curve It, Gauge It, or Leave It? Practical Underdetermination in Gravitational Theories , 2003 .
[50] John D. Norton,et al. Must Evidence Underdetermine Theory , 2003 .
[51] R. Disalle. Conventionalism and Modern Physics: A Re‐Assessment , 2002 .
[52] John D. Norton,et al. `Nature is the Realisation of the Simplest Conceivable Mathematical Ideas': Einstein and the Canon of Mathematical Simplicity , 2000 .
[53] Samir Okasha,et al. The Underdetermination of Theory by Data , 2000 .
[54] H. Brown,et al. The origin of the spacetime metric: Bell's `Lorentzian pedagogy' and its significance in general relativity , 1999, gr-qc/9908048.
[55] E. Gunzig,et al. Conformal transformations in classical gravitational theories and in cosmology , 1998, gr-qc/9811047.
[56] J. Norton. Eliminative Induction as a Method of Discovery: Einstein's Discovery of General Relativity , 1995 .
[57] Carl Hoefer,et al. Empirical Equivalence, Underdetermination, and Systems of the World , 1994, Philosophy of Science.
[58] Lionel Shapiro. ‘Coordinative definition’ and Reichenbach's semantic framework: A reassessment , 1994 .
[59] Stanley L. Jaki. Quelques Réflexions au sujet de la Physique Expérimentale , 1987 .
[60] D. Malament. A Modest Remark about Reichenbach, Rotation, and General Relativity , 1985, Philosophy of Science.
[61] R. Tavakol,et al. Conventionalism and general relativity , 1978 .
[62] C. Glymour. The Epistemology of Geometry , 1977 .
[63] H. P. Robertsons. Geometry as a Branch of Physics , 1976 .
[64] Willard Van Orman Quine,et al. On empirically equivalent systems of the world , 1975 .
[65] J. Earman,et al. The Meaning and Status of Newton's Law of Inertia and the Nature of Gravitational Forces , 1973, Philosophy of Science.
[66] S. Deser. Self-interaction and gauge invariance , 2004, gr-qc/0411023.
[67] R. Sexl. Universal conventionalism and space-time , 1970 .
[68] R. Dicke. Mach's Principle and Invariance under Transformation of Units , 1962 .
[69] R. Dicke,et al. Mach's principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation , 1961 .
[70] W. Thirring. An alternative approach to the theory of gravitation , 1961 .
[71] D. Bohm,et al. Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory , 1959 .
[72] R. Kraichnan. Special-Relativistic Derivation of Generally Covariant Gravitation Theory , 1955 .
[73] P. Frank. Was bedeuten die gegenwärtigen physikalischen Theorien für die allgemeine Erkenntnislehre? , 1930 .
[74] H. Reichenbach. Zur Einordnung des neuen Einsteinschen Ansatzes über Gravitation und Elektrizität , 1929 .
[75] H. Reichenbach. Die neue Theorie Einsteins über die Verschmelzung von Gravitation und Elektrizität , 1929 .
[76] R. Carnap,et al. Der Raum : ein Beitrag zur Wissenschaftslehre , 1922 .
[77] M. Schlick. Raum und Zeit in der gegenwärtigen Physik: Zur Einführung in das Verständnis der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie , 1917 .
[78] E. L.. The Foundations of Geometry , 1891, Nature.