Safety of same day discharge radial PCI in patients under and over 75 years of age.

To check the safety of same day discharge radial PCI in patients under or over 75 years of age. A total of 943 patients who had same day discharge radial PCI between April 1998 and March 2001 were contacted. Patient health status, entry site complications, and repeat interventions during the first month after the procedure were compared in patients under 75 years of age (< 75) with those 75 or over (> or = 75). Responses were received from 811 patients (694 aged < 75 and 117 aged > or = 75 years). Two hundred and thirty-eight patients (34.3%) aged < 75 years and 36 patients (30.7%) aged > or = 75years reported one or more access site complications during the first 24 hours postdischarge, and 105 (15.1%) and 12 patients (10.3%), respectively, during the first month, (P > 0.05). However, all complications in both groups were minor and none of the patients required admission to the hospital. During the first 24 hours postdischarge only one patient (0.1%) aged < 75 years had a repeat angiogram showing a normal patent vessel, while during the first month 4 patients (0.6%) aged < 75 years and none aged > or = 75 years had target vessel closure. Out of the 132 patients who did not respond to our questionnaire, 1 patient aged < 75 and 1 patient aged > or = 75 years had subacute stent thrombosis within a month and died. There were no major entry site complications, and target vessel closure (0.6% versus 0.7%) was similar in patients aged < 75 and > or = 75 years. Thus, same day discharge radial PCI is safe in patients 75 years old or over.

[1]  J. Fox,et al.  Outpatient coronary stenting: Femoral approach with vascular sealing , 1999, Herz.

[2]  H. Matsubara,et al.  Transradial renal artery angioplasty and stenting in a patient with Leriche syndrome. , 2005, International heart journal.

[3]  G. Laarman,et al.  Outpatient coronary angioplasty: Feasible and safe , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[4]  P. Garot,et al.  Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study). , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  A. Ziakas,et al.  Same-day discharge is preferred by the majority of the patients undergoing radial PCI. , 2004, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[6]  R. Warburton,et al.  Comparison of treatment outcomes in patients > or =80 years undergoing transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  D. Cutlip Stent Thrombosis: Historical Perspectives and Current Trends , 2000, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[8]  A. Ziakas,et al.  Safety of same-day-discharge radial percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective study. , 2003, American heart journal.

[9]  T. Ryan,et al.  Predicting vascular complications in percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2003, American heart journal.

[10]  K. Channon,et al.  Same day discharge following elective percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable angina , 2003, Heart.

[11]  J. Webb,et al.  Safety and cost benefit of same-day discharge after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  W. Ghali,et al.  Survival After Coronary Revascularization in the Elderly , 2002, Circulation.

[13]  G. Laarman,et al.  Actual outpatient PTCA: Results of the OUTCLAS pilot study , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  D. Baim,et al.  Stent Thrombosis in the Modern Era: A Pooled Analysis of Multicenter Coronary Stent Clinical Trials , 2001, Circulation.

[15]  C. Foster,et al.  Is coronary angioplasty safe in the elderly? , 2001, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[16]  S. Sdringola,et al.  Causes of early reintervention after successful coronary artery stenting. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  E. Peterson,et al.  Transradial coronary stenting: Comparison with femoral access closed with an arterial suture device , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[19]  J. Moses,et al.  Effectiveness of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin in preventing stent thrombosis after coronary stent implantation. , 1999, Circulation.

[20]  W. Knopf,et al.  Outpatient PTCA with same day discharge is safe and produces high patient satisfaction level. , 1999, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[21]  D. Wennberg,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the elderly: Epidemiology, clinical risk factors, and in-hospital outcomes ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1999 .

[22]  M. Bell,et al.  Timing of coronary stent thrombosis in patients treated with ticlopidine and aspirin. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  D. Wennberg,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the elderly: epidemiology, clinical risk factors, and in-hospital outcomes. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1999, American heart journal.

[24]  E. Fleck,et al.  Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting. The full anticoagulation versus aspirin and ticlopidine (fantastic) study. , 1998, Circulation.

[25]  J. Schneider,et al.  Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  G. Laarman,et al.  A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  J. Tobis,et al.  Subacute stent thrombosis in the era of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary stenting without anticoagulation: frequency, predictors and clinical outcome. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  A. Cribier,et al.  Intracoronary stent implantation without ultrasound guidance and with replacement of conventional anticoagulation by antiplatelet therapy. 30-day clinical outcome of the French Multicenter Registry. , 1996, Circulation.

[29]  P Hall,et al.  Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. , 1995, Circulation.

[30]  P. Serruys,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and management of acute coronary occlusion after coronary angioplasty. , 1994, American heart journal.

[31]  K. Reynen,et al.  PTCA in elderly patients: acute results and long-term follow-up. , 1993, European Heart Journal.

[32]  P. Serruys,et al.  Acute Coronary Artery Occlusion During and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty: Frequency, Prediction, Clinical Course, Management, and Follow‐up , 1991, Circulation.

[33]  D. Faxon,et al.  Incidence and consequences of periprocedural occlusion. The 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. , 1990, Circulation.

[34]  C. Simpfendorfer,et al.  Frequency, management and follow-up of patients with acute coronary occlusions after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.