Marginal abatement costs of greenhouse gas emissions: A meta-analysis

In this paper, we carry out a meta-analysis of recent studies into the costs of greenhouse gas mitigation policies that aim at the long-term stabilisation of these gases in the atmosphere. We find the cost estimates of the studies to be sensitive to the stringency of the stabilisation target, the assumed emissions baseline, the way in which the time profile of emissions is determined in the model, the choice of control variable (CO2 only versus multigas), the number of regions and energy sources in the model and, to a lesser degree, the scientific "forum" in which the study was developed. We find that marginal abatement costs of the stringent long-term targets that are currently considered by the European Commission are still very uncertain but might exceed the costs that have been suggested by recent policy assessments.

[1]  Keigo Akimoto,et al.  Analysis of Technological Portfolios for C02 Stabilizations and Effects of Technological Changes , 2005 .

[2]  David Popp,et al.  Comparison of Climate Policies in the ENTICE-BR Model , 2006 .

[3]  Ekundayo Shittu,et al.  Technical change and the marginal cost of abatement , 2008 .

[4]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges Introduction to the Special Issue of The Energy Journal , 2006 .

[5]  Thomas Bruckner,et al.  Economic Impact Assessment of Climate Change—A Multi-gas Investigation with WIAGEM-GTAPEL-ICM , 2006 .

[6]  Guy Jakeman and Brian S. Fisher,et al.  Benefits of Multi-Gas Mitigation: An Application of the Global Trade and Environment Model (GTEM) , 2006 .

[7]  Jean Charles Hourcade,et al.  Endogenous Structural Change and Climate Targets Modeling Experiments with Imaclim-R , 2006 .

[8]  Richard D. Morgenstern,et al.  Carbon Abatement Costs: Why the Wide Range of Estimates? , 2006 .

[9]  K. Jiang,et al.  Multi-Gas Mitigation Analysis by IPAC , 2006 .

[10]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context , 2007 .

[11]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations , 2007 .

[12]  A. Manne,et al.  The Role of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sinks in Meeting Climate Objectives , 2006 .

[13]  William A. Pizer,et al.  Endogenizing Technological Change: Matching Empirical Evidence to Modeling Needs , 2007 .

[14]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  The Dynamics of Carbon and Energy Intensity in a Model of Endogenous Technical Change , 2005 .

[15]  K. Riahi,et al.  Importance of Technological Change and Spillovers in Long-Term Climate Policy , 2006 .

[16]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Stabilising greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of options and costs , 2006 .

[17]  Burden Sharing Within a Multi-Gas Strategy , 2006 .

[18]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Induced Technological Change in a Limited Foresight Optimization Model , 2005 .

[19]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization: Synthesis Report from the innovation Modeling Comparison Project , 2006 .

[20]  Atsushi Kurosawa,et al.  Multigas Mitigation: An Economic Analysis Using GRAPE Model , 2006 .

[21]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Multi-Gas Emission Reduction for Climate Change Policy: An Application of Fund , 2006 .

[22]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Long-Term Multi-Gas Scenarios to Stabilise Radiative Forcing - Exploring Costs and Benefits Within an Integrated Assessment Framework , 2006 .

[23]  T. Stanley,et al.  Wheat from Chaff: Meta-Analysis as Quantitative Literature Review: Response , 2001 .

[24]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Overview of EMF-21: Multigas Mitigation and Climate Policy , 2006 .

[25]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Modeling endogenous technological change for climate policy analysis , 2008 .

[26]  Jonathan Köhler,et al.  Costs of greenhouse gas abatement: meta-analysis of post-SRES mitigation scenarios , 2002 .

[27]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Multi-Gas Forcing Stabilization with Minicam , 2006 .

[28]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  The Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change: A Comment , 2006 .

[29]  Jonathan Köhler,et al.  Decarbonizing the Global Economy with Induced Technological Change: Scenarios to 2100 using E3MG , 2006 .

[30]  R. Tol.  Biased Policy Advice from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[31]  John P. Weyant,et al.  On the sources of technological change: What do the models assume , 2008 .

[32]  R. Sands,et al.  Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases in the Second Generation Model , 2006 .

[33]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Combining bottom-up and top-down , 2008 .

[34]  R. Repetto,et al.  The costs of climate protection : a guide for the perplexed , 1997 .

[35]  K. Riahi,et al.  The role of non-CO2 greenhouse gases in climate change mitigation: Long-term scenarios for the 21st century , 2006 .

[36]  H. Asbjørn Aaheim,et al.  Costs Savings of a Flexible Multi-Gas Climate Policy , 2006 .

[37]  Toshihiko Masui,et al.  Multi-gas Mitigation Analysis on Stabilization Scenarios Using Aim Global Model , 2006 .

[38]  Donald A. Hanson.  Technology Policy and World Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the AMIGA Modeling System , 2006 .

[39]  Reyer Gerlagh,et al.  ITC in a Global Growth-Climate Model with CCS: The Value of Induced Technical Change for Climate Stabilization , 2006 .

[40]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The Role of Non-CO2 GHGs in Climate Policy: Analysis Using the MIT IGSM , 2006 .

[41]  Peter E. Kennedy,et al.  The Use (and Abuse) of Meta-analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: an Assessment , 2022 .

[42]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs , 2007 .