Fellowship plan and conceptual framework

This document is written to provide: (1) a brief plan of the intended directions of the ALTC program ‘A Pedagogy of Supervision in the Technology disciplines’; and (2) an overview of existing research outcomes which are likely to be of interest to the technology disciplines, including some cross disciplinary research and some focussed specifically on some part of the technology field.

[1]  Joanne W. McClure.  Preparing a laboratory-based thesis: Chinese international research students’ experiences of supervision , 2005 .

[2]  P. Burnard,et al.  The student-supervisor relationship in the phD/Doctoral process. , 2008, British journal of nursing.

[3]  Mona Chung,et al.  Cultural issues in commencing the supervision of Chinese Research students , 2009 .

[4]  Angela Brew,et al.  The nature of research : inquiry in academic contexts , 2001 .

[5]  L. Persson,et al.  A Dynamic Model for Education of Doctoral Students and Guidance of Supervisors in Research Groups , 2005 .

[6]  M. Pearson.  Changing contexts for research education: implications for supervision development , 2005 .

[7]  Anne Venables,et al.  Differing Ways that Computing Academics Understand Teaching. , 2007 .

[8]  Anne Lee,et al.  How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision , 2008 .

[9]  John Hockey,et al.  Motives and Meaning amongst PhD Supervisors in the Social Sciences , 1996 .

[10]  Elaine Martin,et al.  University academics’ experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching , 2008 .

[11]  Christine S. Bruce,et al.  Doctoral students’ experience of information technology research , 2009 .

[12]  Ekrem Manisali,et al.  Assessing supervision requirements of PhD students: The case of construction management and engineering in the UK , 2000 .

[13]  Noela Murphy,et al.  Orientations to Research Higher Degree Supervision: The Interrelatedness of Beliefs about Supervision, Research, Teaching and Learning , 2004 .

[14]  Gail Craswell,et al.  Deconstructing the skills training debate in doctoral education , 2007 .

[15]  I. Tumer,et al.  Benefits Of Team Teaching For Doctoral Students Preparing For Academic Careers , 1998 .

[16]  Margaret Zeegers,et al.  'O' for osmosis, 'P' for pedagogy: fixing the postgraduate wheel of fortune , 2002 .

[17]  Paul C. Burnett,et al.  The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model , 1999 .

[18]  F. Marton,et al.  The University of Learning. Beyond Quality and Competence in Higher Education. , 2013 .

[19]  B. Kamler.  Rethinking doctoral publication practices: writing from and beyond the thesis , 2008 .

[20]  Ross Deuchar,et al.  Facilitator, director or critical friend?: contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles , 2008 .

[21]  Marie Clarke,et al.  Coursework master’s programmes: the student’s experience of research and research supervision , 2009 .

[22]  Margaret Kiley,et al.  Discipline-related Models for a Structured Program at the Commencement of a PhD , 1999 .

[23]  D. Boud,et al.  Changing Practices of Doctoral Education , 2008 .

[24]  M. Hasrati,et al.  Legitimate peripheral participation and supervising Ph.D. students , 2005 .

[25]  Rylan Egan,et al.  Relationships between area of academic concentration, supervisory style, student needs and best practices , 2009 .

[26]  Dianne P. Bills,et al.  Supervisors' conceptions of research and the implications for supervisor development , 2004 .

[27]  Keith Wood.  Changing as a person: the experience of learning to research in the social sciences , 2006 .

[28]  Barbara A. Adkins,et al.  PhD pedagogy and the changing knowledge landscapes of universities , 2009 .

[29]  Jill Jameson.  Intuitive expertise in ICT graduate supervision , 2002 .

[30]  Barbara Kamler,et al.  Driven to abstraction: doctoral supervision and writing pedagogies , 2004 .

[31]  Alison Bartlett,et al.  Cooking Up a Feast: Finding Metaphors for Feminist Postgraduate Supervisions , 1999 .

[32]  Margaret Kiley,et al.  Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing , 2009 .

[33]  Lawrence Wolf,et al.  Doctoral Degrees In Engineering Technology: What Are The Real Issues? , 2006 .

[34]  S. Booth,et al.  Trusting results - An exploration of physicists' conceptions of their own and others' research , 2005 .

[35]  Caroline Baillie,et al.  Building knowledge about the interface , 2001 .

[36]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Creating a Delicate Balance: the doctoral supervisor's dilemmas , 1998 .

[37]  Ian Stoodley,et al.  Constituting the significance and value of research: views from information technology academics and industry professionals , 2004 .

[38]  Binh Pham,et al.  The collective consciousness of information technology research. Research students' ways of seeing information technology research: its objects and territories , 2005 .

[39]  Shirley Booth,et al.  Expounding on physics: a phenomenographic study of physicists talking of their physics , 2002, physics/0205092.

[40]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature , 2008 .

[41]  Robert G. Burgess,et al.  Supervision of Doctoral Students in the Natural Sciences: expectations and experiences , 1997 .

[42]  Angela Brew,et al.  Supervision development and recognition in a reflexive space , 2008 .

[43]  B. Crossouard.  Developing alternative models of doctoral supervision with online formative assessment , 2008 .

[44]  Janne Malfroy,et al.  Doctoral supervision, workplace research and changing pedagogic practices , 2005 .

[45]  David Johnson,et al.  Assessment Matters: Some Issues Concerning the Supervision and Assessment of Work-Based Doctorates. , 2005 .

[46]  L. Ulriksen,et al.  The implied student , 2009 .

[47]  Ruth Neumann,et al.  Policy and practice in doctoral education , 2007 .

[48]  Adrian Ratkic,et al.  Dialogue seminars as a tool in post graduate education , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[49]  Alison Bartlett,et al.  Reconceptualising Discourses of Power in Postgraduate Pedagogies , 2000 .

[50]  Mara Wasburn,et al.  Creating Community: A Pilot Program For Doctoral Students , 2002 .

[51]  A. Brew.  Conceptions of Research: A phenomenographic study , 2001 .

[52]  Esat Alpay,et al.  Postgraduate training in student learning and teaching , 2000 .

[53]  Margaret Kiley,et al.  Supervisors' Conceptions of Research: What are they? , 2005 .

[54]  John Willison,et al.  Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: a framework for students becoming researchers , 2007 .

[55]  G. Gurr,et al.  Negotiating the "Rackety Bridge" — a Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development , 2001 .

[56]  Catherine Manathunga,et al.  Imagining an interdisciplinary doctoral pedagogy , 2006 .

[57]  Constituting information technology research: the experience of IT researchers , 2005 .

[58]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Students' Conceptions of Research. I: A qualitative and quantitative analysis , 2005 .