Screening of the common culture conditions affecting crystallinity of bacterial cellulose

By analyzing with X-ray diffraction and FT-IR spectroscopy, the main effective factors among common culture conditions on crystallinity index and Iα fraction of cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus were examined with Plackett–Burman design experiment. Varying pH value in the medium by adjusting the composition of citrate buffer or by adding HCl/NaOH solution indicates it is the content of citrate buffer rather than its function of pH buffering that gives the influence on crystallinity. Further experiment reveals that Na+ concentration of 0.174 mol/l in medium with citrate buffer added would decrease the crystallinity index significantly. Comparison of carbon sources shows that fructose leads to a higher crystallinity index than glucose, which suggests a relationship between crystallinity and production speed of bacterial cellulose affected by carbon sources. An interesting phenomenon was that a longer period of cultivation would decrease the crystallinity of bacterial cellulose. The reason is assumed to be the dense network of cellulose formed by bacterial cells that restrict the motion of themselves as the incubation period extends. Though the effect of inoculum age is still unclear, the influence on crystallinity of bacterial cellulose caused by variation of some ordinary culture conditions can be drawn out from data of this work.

[1]  S. Moon,et al.  Comparisons of physical properties of bacterial celluloses produced in different culture conditions using saccharified food wastes , 2006 .

[2]  Biao Wang,et al.  Biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose/multi-walled carbon nanotubes in agitated culture , 2008 .

[3]  T. Tsuchida,et al.  Screening of Bacterial Cellulose-producing Acetobacter Strains Suitable for Agitated Culture , 1995 .

[4]  S. Keshk,et al.  Bacterial Cellulose Production from Beet Molasses , 2006 .

[5]  Takaaki Naritomi,et al.  Effect of lactate on bacterial cellulose production from fructose in continuous culture , 1998 .

[6]  Jay Shah,et al.  Towards electronic paper displays made from microbial cellulose , 2004, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[7]  R. Brown,et al.  Microbial cellulose--the natural power to heal wounds. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[8]  D. Goring,et al.  Effect of mercerization on the crystallite size and crystallinity index in cellulose from different sources , 1987 .

[9]  W. Wan,et al.  Bacterial cellulose and its nanocomposites for biomedical applications , 2006 .

[10]  H. Kono,et al.  Role of ethanol in improvement of bacterial cellulose production: analysis using 13C-labeled carbon sources. , 2004 .

[11]  Dieter Klemm,et al.  Bacterial synthesized cellulose — artificial blood vessels for microsurgery , 2001 .

[12]  J. Sugiyama,et al.  Aggregation of ribbons in bacterial cellulose induced by high pressure incubation , 2003 .

[13]  S. Kuga,et al.  Native Cellulose II Production by Acetobacter Xylinum Under Physical Constraints , 1998 .

[14]  L. Hu,et al.  Effect of addition of sodium alginate on bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum , 2007, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[15]  R. Cameron,et al.  Simultaneous SAXS and WAXS investigations of changes in native cellulose fiber microstructure on swelling in aqueous sodium hydroxide , 2002 .

[16]  Wojciech Czaja,et al.  Structural investigations of microbial cellulose produced in stationary and agitated culture , 2004 .

[17]  M. Sierakowski,et al.  Production and characterization of nanospheres of bacterial cellulose from Acetobacter xylinum from processed rice bark , 2009 .

[18]  M. Tsuji,et al.  COMMUNICATION: Culture conditions producing structure entities composed of Cellulose I and II in bacterial cellulose , 1997 .

[19]  Dieter Klemm,et al.  Nanocelluloses as Innovative Polymers in Research and Application , 2006 .

[20]  A. Kai,et al.  Influence of substituent of direct dye having bisphenylenebis(azo) skeletal structure on structure of nascent cellulose produced by Acetobacter xylinum [I]: different influence of direct red 28, blue 1 and 15 on nascent structure. , 1997, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[21]  Hiroyuki Yamamoto,et al.  In situ crystallization of bacterial cellulose II. Influences of different polymeric additives on the formation of celluloses Iα and Iβ at the early stage of incubation , 1996 .

[22]  H. Jin,et al.  Transparent nanocomposites prepared by incorporating microbial nanofibrils into poly(L-lactic acid) , 2009 .

[23]  Takaaki Naritomi,et al.  Regular paperEffect of ethanol on bacterial cellulose production from fructose in continuous culture , 1998 .

[24]  R. Plackett,et al.  THE DESIGN OF OPTIMUM MULTIFACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS , 1946 .