Analysis of antibodies of known structure suggests a lack of correspondence between the residues in contact with the antigen and those modified by somatic hypermutation

Forty unique murine antibody–antigen complexes determined at 2.5 Å or less resolution are analyzed to determine whether the residues in direct contact with the antigen are modified by somatic hypermutation. This was done by taking advantage of the recent characterization of the pool of Vκ germline genes of the mouse. The average number of residues in contact with the antigen in the VL gene, which contains the CDRL‐1, CDRL‐2, and all but one residue of CDRL‐3, was six. The average number of somatic mutations was similar (around five). However, as many as 53% of the antibodies did not show somatic replacements of residues in contact with the antigen. Another 28% had only one. Overall, the frequency of antibodies with increasing number of somatic replacements in residues in contact with the antigen decreased exponentially. A possible explanation of this finding is that mutations in the contacting residues have an adverse effect on the antigen–antibody interaction. This implies that most of the observed mutations are those remaining after negative (purifying) selection. Therefore, efficient strategies of site‐directed mutagenesis to improve the affinity of antibodies should be focused on residues other than those directly interacting with the antigen. Proteins 2001;45:199–206. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Weitzman,et al.  Somatic hypermutation , 2020, Genome Biology.

[2]  G. Georgiou,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the effect of the mutation frequency on the affinity maturation of single chain Fv antibodies. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  P. Lipsky,et al.  Targeting and subsequent selection of somatic hypermutations in the human Vκ repertoire , 1999 .

[4]  H. Zachau,et al.  The variable genes and gene families of the mouse immunoglobulin κ locus , 1999 .

[5]  R Mehr,et al.  Reconciling repertoire shift with affinity maturation: the role of deleterious mutations. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[6]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  M. Arkin,et al.  Probing the importance of second sphere residues in an esterolytic antibody by phage display. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  K. Kuma,et al.  The Complete Nucleotide Sequence of the Human Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region Locus , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  M. Stenzel-Poore,et al.  Harmful somatic mutations: lessons from the dark side , 1998, Immunological reviews.

[11]  M. Diaz,et al.  Evolution of somatic hypermutation and gene conversion in adaptive immunity , 1998, Immunological reviews.

[12]  E. Steele,et al.  The signature of somatic hypermutation appears to be written into the germline IgV segment repertoire , 1998, Immunological reviews.

[13]  A. Lesk,et al.  Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  R C Stevens,et al.  Structural insights into the evolution of an antibody combining site. , 1997, Science.

[15]  M. Lefranc,et al.  Sequence and evolution of the human germline V lambda repertoire. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  D Altschuh,et al.  Functional mapping of conserved residues located at the VL and VH domain interface of a Fab. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  E L Sonnhammer,et al.  The imprint of somatic hypermutation on the repertoire of human germline V genes. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  J. Weill,et al.  Rearrangement/hypermutation/gene conversion: when, where and why? , 1996, Immunology today.

[19]  Chantal Abergel,et al.  Identification of specificity‐determining residues in antibodies , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[20]  M. Hurle,et al.  A role for destabilizing amino acid replacements in light-chain amyloidosis. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  J. Thornton,et al.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  I. Tomlinson,et al.  A directory of human germ‐line Vχ segments reveals a strong bias in their usage , 1994 .

[23]  H. Zachau The immunoglobulin kappa locus-or-what has been learned from looking closely at one-tenth of a percent of the human genome. , 1993, Gene.

[24]  H. Zachau,et al.  Expressed human immunoglobulin ϰ genes and their hypermutation , 1993 .

[25]  V. Pascual,et al.  Complementarity‐determining region 2 is implicated in the binding of staphylococcal protein A to human immunoglobulin VHIII variable regions , 1993, European journal of immunology.

[26]  G. Litman,et al.  Somatic variation precedes extensive diversification of germline sequences and combinatorial joining in the evolution of immunoglobulin heavy chain diversity , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[27]  R. Bruccoleri,et al.  Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  I. Tomlinson,et al.  The repertoire of human germline VH sequences reveals about fifty groups of VH segments with different hypervariable loops. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  G. Winter,et al.  Antibody framework residues affecting the conformation of the hypervariable loops. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  C. Milstein,et al.  Kinetic maturation of an immune response , 1991, Nature.

[31]  C. Milstein,et al.  Three‐dimensional structure determination of an anti‐2‐phenyloxazolone antibody: the role of somatic mutation and heavy/light chain pairing in the maturation of an immune response. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[32]  Y. Argon,et al.  A single amino acid substitution in the variable region of the light chain specifically blocks immunoglobulin secretion. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  C. Milstein,et al.  Mutation Drift and Repertoire Shift in the Maturation of the Immune Response , 1987, Immunological reviews.

[34]  M. L. Connolly Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1983, Science.

[35]  M. Goldschmidt-Clermont,et al.  Two genes for the major heat-shock protein of Drosophila melanogaster arranged as an inverted repeat. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  S. Tonegawa,et al.  Somatic generation of antibody diversity. , 1976, Nature.

[37]  T. T. Wu,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE SEQUENCES OF THE VARIABLE REGIONS OF BENCE JONES PROTEINS AND MYELOMA LIGHT CHAINS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR ANTIBODY COMPLEMENTARITY , 1970, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[38]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  I. Tomlinson,et al.  A directory of human germ-line V kappa segments reveals a strong bias in their usage. , 1994, European journal of immunology.

[40]  R. Poljak,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of immunoglobulins. , 1979, Annual review of biochemistry.