Conditioning of counter-empathetic emotional responses ☆

Abstract The present research tested the hypothesis that the quality of an observer's vicarious emotional response, as measured by autonomic, expressive, and self-report indexes, is a function of the observer's conditioning history with particular facial expressive displays of emotion. It was predicted that conditions of congruence (Symmetry) between the affective expression of a model and the outcome (shock or reward) presented to an observer would enhance initial empathetic responses, but that conditions of incongruence (Asymmetry) between the model's displays and observer's outcomes would lead to counter-empathetic responses. These changes in the quality of observers' vicarious emotional responses should generalize to a test phase when no rewards or punishments are presented to observers. The results for all measures were consistent and indicate that asymmetric conditioning modified the initial empathetic responses of observers to either counter-empathetic responses or indifference. On the other hand, symmetric conditioning enhanced observers' initial empathetic responses. These effects were evident in the test phase when no reinforcements were administered to the subject. The results are consistent with the theoretical assumption that facial expressions of emotion can acquire meaning and hedonic valence because of their predictive significance and thus can function as conditioned stimuli capable of evoking empathetic and counter-empathetic emotional responses.

[1]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  Facial expressions of emotion as conditioned stimuli for human autonomic responses. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  Vicarious instigation and conditioning of facial expressive and autonomic responses to a model's expressive display of pain , 1980 .

[3]  A. Bandura Vicarious Processes: A Case of No-Trial Learning1 , 1965 .

[4]  G. Klerman,et al.  Facial muscle patterning to affective imagery in depressed and nondepressed subjects , 1976, Science.

[5]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[6]  T. Rosenthal,et al.  Vicarious classical conditioning as a function of arousal level. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  D. Kravetz Heart rate as a minimal cue for the occurrence of vicarious classical conditioning. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  D. T. Regan,et al.  Empathy and attribution: turning observers into actors. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  S. Hygge Information about the model's unconditioned stimulus and response in vicarious classical conditioning. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  M. D. Storms,et al.  Videotape and the attribution process: reversing actors' and observers' points of view. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  D. Krebs Empathy and altruism. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Contrast empathy and observer modeling behavior1 , 1977 .

[13]  Seymour M. Berger,et al.  Conditioning through vicarious instigation. , 1962 .

[14]  Ezra Stotland,et al.  Exploratory Investigations of Empathy1 , 1969 .

[15]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  Stimulus properties of facial expressions and their influence on the classical conditioning of fear , 1981 .

[16]  J. Piaget The Moral Judgment of the Child , 1932 .

[17]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[18]  Ezra Stotland,et al.  Empathy Fantasy and Helping , 1978 .

[19]  K. Craig,et al.  Heart-rate components of conditioned vicarious autonomic responses. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  C. Hjortsjö Man's face and mimic language , 1969 .

[21]  Joanne Cantor,et al.  Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist , 1977 .

[22]  D. Bramel,et al.  An observers' reaction to the suffereing of his enemy. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.