Discovering formulaic language through data-driven learning: Student attitudes and efficacy

Corpus linguistics has established that language is highly patterned. The use of patterned language has been linked to processing advantages with respect to listening and reading, which has implications for perceptions of fluency. The last twenty years has seen an increase in the integration of corpus-based language learning, or data-driven learning (DDL), as a supporting feature in teaching English as a foreign / second language (EFL/ESL). Most research has investigated student attitudes towards DDL as a tool to facilitate writing. Other studies, though notably fewer, have taken a quantitative perspective of the efficacy of DDL as a tool to facilitate the inductive learning of grammar rules. The purpose of this study is three-fold: (1) to present an EFL curriculum designed around DDL with the aim of improving spoken fluency; (2) to gauge how effective students were in employing newly discovered phrases in an appropriate manner; and (3) to investigate student attitudes toward such an approach to language learning. Student attitudes were investigated via a questionnaire and then triangulated through interviews and student logs. The findings indicate that students believe DDL to be a useful and effective tool in the classroom. However, students do note some difficulties related to DDL, such as encountering unfamiliar vocabulary and cut-off concordance lines. Finally, questions are raised as to the students’ ability to embed learned phrases in a pragmatically appropriate way.

[1]  John Sinclair,et al.  How to use corpora in language teaching , 2004 .

[2]  Alison Wray,et al.  Pushing learners to the extreme: the artificial use of prefabricated material in conversation , 2010 .

[3]  Guy Aston,et al.  Corpora and language learners , 2004 .

[4]  Alison Mackey,et al.  The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition , 2012 .

[5]  Silvia Bernardini In the classroom: Corpora in the classroom: An overview and some reflections on future developments , 2004 .

[6]  A. Boulton Data‐Driven Learning: Taking the Computer Out of the Equation , 2010 .

[7]  Pascual Pérez-Paredes,et al.  Exploring the Use of Multidimensional Analysis of Learner Language to Promote Register Awareness. , 2012 .

[8]  Angela Chambers,et al.  Corpus consultation and advanced learners’ writing skills in French , 2004 .

[9]  María Moreno Jaén,et al.  Exploring new paths in language pedagogy : lexis and corpus-based language teaching , 2010 .

[10]  B. Erman,et al.  The idiom principle and the open choice principle , 2000 .

[11]  Susan Hunston,et al.  Corpora in Applied Linguistics , 2002 .

[12]  Ana Frankenberg-Garcia Learners’ Use of Corpus Examples , 2012 .

[13]  Tim F. Johns Micro-concord: A language learner's research tool , 1986 .

[14]  Suzanne Irujo,et al.  A Piece of Cake: Learning and Teaching Idioms. , 1986 .

[15]  Ute Römer,et al.  Exploring the lexis-grammar interface , 2009 .

[16]  C. Westbury,et al.  Processing Advantages of Lexical Bundles: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading and Sentence Recall Tasks. , 2011 .

[17]  Angela Chambers INTEGRATING CORPUS CONSULTATION IN LANGUAGE STUDIES , 2005 .

[18]  Hyunsook Yoon,et al.  More than a linguistic reference: The influence of corpus technology on L2 academic writing , 2008 .

[19]  Margaret Mc So,et al.  Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition , 2009 .

[20]  Dilin Liu,et al.  Using a Corpus-Based Lexicogrammatical Approach to Grammar Instruction in EFL and ESL Contexts. , 2009 .

[21]  Angela Chambers Integrating Corpora in Language Learning and Teaching , 2007, ReCALL.

[22]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. (Target article) , 2002 .

[23]  Kathy Conklin,et al.  Formulaic Sequences: Are They Processed More Quickly than Nonformulaic Language by Native and Nonnative Speakers? , 2008 .

[24]  Yu-Hua Chen,et al.  Lexical Bundles in L1 and L2 Academic Writing. , 2010 .

[25]  U. Römer Corpus Research Applications in Second Language Teaching , 2011, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[26]  Hyunsook Yoon,et al.  ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing , 2004 .

[27]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Behavioral profiles A fine-grained and quantitative approach in corpus-based lexical semantics , 2011 .

[28]  D. Biber,et al.  If you look at …: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks , 2004 .

[29]  Ronald Carter,et al.  Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse , 2004 .

[30]  Alison Wray,et al.  Formulaic Language and the Lexicon: List of Figures and Tables , 2002 .

[31]  Claire Fiona Kennedy,et al.  Corpus-Assisted Creative Writing: Introducing Intermediate Italian Learners to a Corpus as a Reference Resource , 2010 .

[32]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Formulaic Language and Second Language Acquisition: Zipf and the Phrasal Teddy Bear , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[33]  Alex Boulton,et al.  Testing the limits of data-driven learning: language proficiency and training , 2009, ReCALL.

[34]  U. Römer The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives , 2009 .

[35]  Nan Jiang,et al.  The Processing of Formulaic Sequences by Second Language Speakers. , 2007 .

[36]  Guy Cook,et al.  Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson , 1995 .