Combined corrections for attenuation, depthdependent blur, and motion in cardiac SPECT: A multicenter trial

BackgroundThe diagnostic accuracy of cardiac single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is limited by image-degrading factors, such as heart or subject motion, depthdependent blurring caused by the collimator, and photon scatter and attenuation. We developed correction approaches for motion, depth-dependent blur, and attenuation and performed a multicenter validation.Methods and ResultsMotion was corrected both transversely and axially with a cross-correlation technique. Depth-dependent blurring was corrected by first back-projecting each projection and then applying a depth-dependent Wiener filter row by row. Attenuation was corrected with an iterative, nonuniform Chang algorithm, based on a transmission scan-generated attenuation map. We validated these approaches in 112 subjects, including 36 women (20 healthy volunteers, 8 angiographically normal patients, and 8 patients with coronary artery disease [CAD]found by means of angiography) and 76 men (23 healthy volunteers, 10 angiographically normal patients, and 43 patients with CAD found by means of angiography). Either technetium 99m or thallium 201 was used for emission; either gadolinium 153 or Tc-99m was used for transmission. Images were reconstructed and blindly interpreted with a 5-point scale for receiver operating characteristic analysis in 2 ways: motion correction plus a Butterworth filter, and combined motion and blur and attenuation corrections. The interpretation by means of consensus was for the overall presence of CAD and vascular territory. The receiver operating characteristic curves for overall presence and each of the 3 main coronary arteries were all shifted upward and to the left and had larger areas under the curve, for combined corrections compared with motion correction and Butterworth. Sensitivity/specificity for motion correction and Butterworth were 84/69, 64/71, 32/94, and 71/81 overall for the left anterior descending, the right coronary artery, and circumflex territories, respectively, compared with 88/92, 77/93, 50/97, and 74/95, respectively, for the combined corrections.ConclusionsThe proposed combined corrections for motion, depth-dependent blur, and attenuation significantly improve diagnostic accuracy, when compared with motion correction alone.

[1]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Improved SPECT quantification using compensation for scattered photons. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  P. Msaki,et al.  Subtraction of Compton-scattered photons in single-photon emission computerized tomography. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  C E Floyd,et al.  Deconvolution of Compton scatter in SPECT. , 1985, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  R. Pettigrew,et al.  Fundamentals of 180 degree acquisition and reconstruction in SPECT imaging. , 1986, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  J M Links,et al.  Scatter correction in SPECT using non-uniform attenuation data. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  J M Links,et al.  Correction for patient and organ movement in SPECT: application to exercise thallium-201 cardiac imaging. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  R. Eisner,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the tomographic thallium-201 myocardial bullseye display: critical role of correcting for patient motion. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  A Todd-Pokropek,et al.  Assessment and comparison of three scatter correction techniques in single photon emission computed tomography. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  A. Formiconi,et al.  Compensation of spatial system response in SPECT with conjugate gradient reconstruction technique. , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  J R Perry,et al.  Correction of nonuniform attenuation in cardiac SPECT imaging. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  L. Becker,et al.  Improved diagnostic performance of exercise thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography over planar imaging in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a receiver operating characteristic analysis. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  E G DePuey,et al.  Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  J M Links,et al.  Wiener filtering improves quantification of regional myocardial perfusion with thallium-201 SPECT. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  E C Frey,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of emission and transmission data for improved thallium-201 cardiac SPECT imaging using a technetium-99m transmission source. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Matt A. King,et al.  A dual-photopeak window method for scatter correction. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  T. Turkington,et al.  Simultaneous compensation for attenuation, scatter and detector response for SPECT reconstruction in three dimensions. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  F. Wackers Artifacts in planar and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. , 1992, American journal of cardiac imaging.

[18]  J R Galt,et al.  SPECT quantification: a simplified method of attenuation and scatter correction for cardiac imaging. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  D. Berman,et al.  Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamic and static myocardial SPECT using a multi-detector camera. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  B F Hutton,et al.  A scanning line source for simultaneous emission and transmission measurements in SPECT. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  K. Ogawa,et al.  Compton scatter compensation using the triple-energy window method for single- and dual-isotope SPECT. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  E C Frey,et al.  The importance and implementation of accurate 3D compensation methods for quantitative SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  G J Hademenos,et al.  Comparison of four scatter correction methods using Monte Carlo simulated source distributions. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  P D Wolf,et al.  Estimation of tissue resistivities from multiple-electrode impedance measurements. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Michael A. King,et al.  Noniterative compensation for the distance-dependent detector response and photon attenuation in SPECT imaging , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[26]  E G DePuey,et al.  How to detect and avoid myocardial perfusion SPECT artifacts. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  T G Turkington,et al.  A 3D model of non-uniform attenuation and detector response for efficient iterative reconstruction in SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  D S Lalush,et al.  Improving the convergence of iterative filtered backprojection algorithms. , 1994, Medical physics.

[29]  S L Bacharach,et al.  Artifactual inhomogeneities in myocardial PET and SPECT scans in normal subjects. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Fourier correction for spatially variant collimator blurring in SPECT , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[31]  I Buvat,et al.  Comparative assessment of nine scatter correction methods based on spectral analysis using Monte Carlo simulations. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  M. King,et al.  Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: Part 1. Impact of attenuation and methods of estimating attenuation maps , 1995, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[33]  J. Fessler,et al.  Simultaneous transmission/emission myocardial perfusion tomography. Diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. , 1996, Circulation.

[34]  Matt A. King,et al.  Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: Part 2. Attenuation compensation algorithms , 1996, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[35]  W. Leslie,et al.  Comparison of motion correction algorithms for cardiac SPECT. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  Michael A. King,et al.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT , 1998, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[37]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Comparison of four motion correction techniques in SPECT imaging of the heart: a cardiac phantom study. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  J. Foulon,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of a comprehensive motion, resolution, and attenuation correction program: Initial experience , 1998, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[39]  T Sharir,et al.  Evaluation of an attenuation correction method for thallium-201 myocardial perfusion tomographic imaging of patients with low likelihood of coronary artery disease , 1998, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[40]  J. Sýkora,et al.  Attenuation-corrected thallium-201 single-photon emission tomography using a gadolinium-153 moving line source: clinical value and the impact of attenuation correction on the extent and severity of perfusion abnormalities , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  K. Ogawa,et al.  Application of transmission scan-based attenuation compensation to scatter-corrected thallium-201 myocardial single-photon emission tomographic images , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[42]  F J Wackers Attenuation correction, or the emperor's new clothes? , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  I Buvat,et al.  Impact of attenuation correction by simultaneous emission/transmission tomography on visual assessment of 201Tl myocardial perfusion images. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  Jyrki T. Kuikka,et al.  Quality of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission tomography imaging: multicentre evaluation with a cardiac phantom , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[45]  I. Buvat,et al.  Respective roles of scatter, attenuation, depth-dependent collimator response and finite spatial resolution in cardiac single-photon emission tomography quantitation: a Monte Carlo study , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  G V Heller,et al.  Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. , 1999, Circulation.

[47]  J. Sýkora,et al.  Attenuation correction improves the detection of viable myocardium by thallium-201 cardiac tomography in patients with previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.